/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15120896]

Are there any philosophers who could refute him?

[Anonymous No.15121045]

>>15120896
Stirner, who was a cuck, and would probably argue that the ultimate final cuck is also the ultimate final hapiness and refute his idea of this being a negative thing whereas for stirner (who was a giant fucking cuck) this is actually an affirmation of life

[Anonymous No.15121053]

>>15121045
>who was a cuck
cuckoldry is a spook, also source?

[Anonymous No.15121097]

>>15121053
>there are people that don't know that stirner was literally as in none-meme literally as in literally and not metaphorically literally an actual cuck browsing this board RIGHT NOW
/lit/ has sure fallen, 4channers were great, 4ch*nnelers are not

[Anonymous No.15121128]

>>15121097
oh I get it now, his whole "spook" schitck was to cope with being cucked.

[Anonymous No.15121131]

>>15120896
Josef Fritzl

[Anonymous No.15121142]

>>15121128
now you're just embarrassing yourself

[Anonymous No.15121144]

>>15121128
no
i mean, okay he was a cuck
but in the same sense a gold-digging woman is a cuckqueen
read the biography, you'll get what i mean

[Anonymous No.15121172]

>>15121144
Could someone on the right, but who has a lot of respect for individualism and a soft spot for Ancap forefathers (Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe) get something useful out of reading Stirner? I’m not necessarily talking about in a political sense but more a personal development sense.

[Anonymouss No.15121172,1]

>>15121172

i got really something usefull for my personal development from stirner,

before i knew him, i forced myself to read philosophies, forced myself to believe in so called universal principle and empty selflessness which really reduce my 'owness'.

Teach me to believe in my own judgment rather than blindly follow empty principle from books.

to define my important things based on my personal experience, knowledge, wisdom and feeling rather than empty sacred ideas