[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 81 KB, 1280x720, 05DD29C1-BAA4-41F4-8971-1BBAE63ED66E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106402 No.15106402 [Reply] [Original]

Everyone says you should start with philosophy by reading Plato first, but to what extent?
I’ve read the trial and death of Socrates and the Republic, and I think I get the gist really.
Socrates basically exposes the limits of human knowledge through his questioning. There are little nuggets here and there but I think the big idea is the mostly abstract aim of Socratic questioning, right?
Am I ready to move on to Aristotle yet?

>> No.15106419
File: 4 KB, 250x250, 1586148377380s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106419

>>15106402
you do not get the gist. Read everything and then commentary. Jesus Christ are you guys too busy to read?

>> No.15106430

No, you should start with the pre-socratics.

>> No.15106435

>>15106402
NO PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THIS MISTAKE. Read the later dialogues (Theaetetus, Cratylus, Phaedrus, Philebus, Sophist, Statesman, Laws, Parmenides, Timaeus). They are the heart of Platonic metaphysics, the philosophy which comes to dominate the West and shape the Church. Also read Proclus, Damascius, Ficino, Syrianus, Simplicius and Porphyry's commentaries on the dialogues since you almost certainly do not understand them fully. The Socratic method is literally the tip of the iceberg, its hardly even Platonic.

>> No.15106440
File: 35 KB, 263x400, 993740A5-AB03-4F3D-BFB9-85758A9BA05C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106440

>>15106430
I did that already

>> No.15106509
File: 67 KB, 720x644, 1D208EC9-3A9A-4D60-8137-E1EAF6D17585.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106509

>>15106435
Thanks anon I genuinely appreciate your post