[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 671 KB, 1009x1317, kant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106124 No.15106124 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any writers/philosophers/artists that you would consider yourself an expert in?

>> No.15106249

>>15106124
faggotry

>> No.15106257

>>15106124
Mainly N1x Land, Nick Land, Moldbug, Kant, Deleuze.

But others too.

>> No.15106265
File: 143 KB, 1050x788, chandler2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15106265

Yes, I am an expert on the life and works of Christian Weston Chandler and I expect to complete the first volume of my biography of him by this Winter.

>> No.15107365

Nah, only enough in all of them to say that I'm comfortable to discuss and contribute, but not enough to debate and assert

>> No.15107385

>>15106124
Samuel Beckett, I wrote my thesis on him. I was completely obsessed with him for a very long time and I still haven't fully recovered

>> No.15107396
File: 24 KB, 600x718, 1514734189321.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15107396

None desu.

>> No.15107593

Which one would sound the most impressive to be an expert in? Asking the real questions here.

>> No.15107945

>>15107593
The most impressive to me personally would be Christopher Marlowe. Not because he is difficult or obscure but simply because it makes me think "wow, this person probably has something interesting to say about literature".
The most impressive in pseud terms? Perhaps Kant, if we take expert in the highest regard. Also, Wagner, whose idea of Gesamtkunstwerk in relation to other arts is one of the most neglected in modern art.

>> No.15107956

>>15107945
why is Kant pseud?