[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 59 KB, 640x683, vmlmpq3rnlj41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15052785 No.15052785[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Which philosopher explains the nature of modern weak men (simps, milquetoasts, "soibois", cucks, etc)?

>> No.15052796

Your diary

>> No.15052800

>>15052785
your mom

>> No.15052804

Bronze Age Pervert.

>> No.15052805

ask your dad what he thinks about u

>> No.15052815

Mankind is devolving into a bug-like species caused by a cocktail of degenerate tendencies in late stage capitalism. Artificial sweeteners, plastic bottles, excessive onions-consumption and endless hours in front of the internet without proper physical activity is causing morphological changes to men: they are becoming flabby and effeminate looking.

Their values have evolved to scorn religion and the folk culture of one's forefathers, and instead it embraces obscene and child-like entertainment on Netflix and a mindless devotion to Scientism - the cheap psychedelic awe of gazing into astronomical photographs and reading popularizations of quantum mechanics replaces the Bugman's need for serious philosophical meditation on metaphysical principles.

Nietzsche warned us of the Bugmen who would inhabit the cities in the twilight days of western civilization. In Thus Spake Zarathustra he describes the Bugman in great detail:

I see and have seen worse things, and divers things so hideous, that I should neither like to speak of all matters, nor even keep silent about some of them: namely, men who lack everything, except that they have too much of one thing—men who are nothing more than a big eye, or a big mouth, or a big belly, or something else big,—reversed cripples, I call such men.

And when I came out of my solitude, and for the first time passed over this bridge, then I could not trust mine eyes, but looked again and again, and said at last: "That is an ear! An ear as big as a man!" I looked still more attentively—and actually there did move under the ear something that was pitiably small and poor and slim. And in truth this immense ear was perched on a small thin stalk—the stalk, however, was a man! A person putting a glass to his eyes, could even recognise further a small envious countenance, and also that a bloated soullet dangled at the stalk. The people told me, however, that the big ear was not only a man, but a great man, a genius. But I never believed in the people when they spake of great men—and I hold to my belief that it was a reversed cripple, who had too little of everything, and too much of one thing.

>> No.15052818

>>15052785
Nietzsche

>> No.15052836

>>15052785
literally the Bible, it's a direct result of nihilism

>> No.15052861

someone actually drew this
and they think they are 'true man'
LMAO

>> No.15052884

>>15052861
me laugh at this. this funny.

>> No.15052901

>>15052861
>t. woman who wants to shame men into social conformity by pointing out their lack of access to the vagene

>> No.15052906

>>15052800
>>15052805
based

>> No.15052937

>>15052901
you can see the hatred in the squiggles
its sad really desu

>> No.15052942

>>15052785
Don't forget trannies

>> No.15052951

>>15052815
>Artificial sweeteners, plastic bottles, excessive onions-consumption and endless hours in front of the internet without proper physical activity is causing morphological changes to men: they are becoming flabby and effeminate looking.
–he says, while spending endless hours in front of the internet.

>> No.15052959

>>15052951
Yeah, everything he says is totally wrong now. Good job tearing up that shit argument.

>> No.15053070

>>15052815
Is this a copy pasta?

>> No.15053375

>>15052785
It's not that hard to understand. Men are genetically predisposed to simping, because providing for women keeps the species alive. Global communication has kind of fucked men up, because they see every woman as someone in need of their help. Where before, their impulses were only localized to the women they happen to know nearby. You know... Becky's down on her luck. And some nice guy pays her rent to keep her on her feet, and somehow angles it into a date, and he's happy.

Just like the internet has given women unrestrained attention, so has it given men unrestrained servitude. Now every Becky across the entire globe is in this man's world scope. And he doesn't know how to filter it all.

>> No.15053383

>>15052785
UG Krishnamurti

>> No.15053405
File: 110 KB, 736x1008, 4593e03db8ca83beec3274dbfdcb2ec4--d-art-mistress.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15053405

This is the explanation for the nature of the modern weak man

>> No.15053409
File: 40 KB, 647x659, 163527534.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15053409

>>15052959

>> No.15053449

>>15052951
>–he says, while spending endless hours in front of the internet.
Prove it.

>> No.15053460

I don't consider milquetoast to be in the same category as soibois, cucks and simps.

>> No.15053463

>>15052785
Uncle Ted

>> No.15053507

>>15052815
Nietzsche's not talking about consumerist femboys there though. He's talking about what the industrial age has done to men. Men aren't supposed to be men anymore, they're supposed to be machines that excel at one specialised task and never venture out of that. To be a competitive member of our society it's not enough to be the best man for the job, you need to compete with machines too. The genius of today isn't a man who can do anything, the genius of today is a man who can only do one thing but can do it better than a machine ever could.

This is why they call the giant ear a genius in that passage. He can't do anything but hear, but he can hear better than anyone. It's a commentary on industrial and academic specialisation.