/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.15007419]

A liberal Jewish homosexual lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on John Stuart Mill, a known liberal.

"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Mill and accept that he was the most free being the world has ever known, even greater than Leo Strauss!"

At this moment, a brave, nationalistic, pro-emergency powers legal Jurist who had served over 1500 cases and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by Germay stood up and held up a Pollack.

"Is this Pole our friend or enemy?"

The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied "all men are our friends, you stupid Fascist"

"Wrong. The distinction between friend and enemy refers to the utmost degree of intensity, of an association or dissociation. The utmost degree of association is the willingness to fight and die for and together with other members of one’s group, and the ultimate degree of dissociation is the willingness to kill others for the simple reason that they are members of a hostile group. One cannot judge, from an external perspective, that a group is morally unjustified in defining its own identity in a certain way and to introduce political enmity, with the attendant possibility of killing, to preserve that identity. Only members of a group are in a position to decide, from the perspective of an existentially affected participant, whether the otherness of another group amounts to a threat to their own form of life and thus potentially requires to be fought"

The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of On Liberty. He stormed out of the room crying those liberal crocodile tears. The same tears liberals cry for the "poor" (who today live in such luxury that most own radiators) when they jealously try to claw justly earned power from the deserving sovereign dictators. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Adam Friedland, wished he had pulled himself up by constitutional law and become more than a sophist liberal professor. He wished so much that he had an enemy to kill to save himself from embarrassment, but he himself had failed to distinguish any!

The students applauded and all registered National Socialist that day and accepted Hitler as their lord and savior. A Reichsadler named "Heidegger" flew into the room and perched atop the Nazi Flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The Soldier's Oath was recited several times, and Hitler himself showed up and enacted Enabling Act of 1933 across the country.

The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the liberal plague syphilis and was tossed a crematorium.
Heil Hitler

[Anonymous No.15007451]

>>15007419
Is this your fanfiction OP? The prose needs some polishing!

[Anonymous No.15007484]

>>15007419
Hello based department?

[Anonymous No.15007502]

Based

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » No.15007516]

Not funny.

[Anonymous No.15007558]

>>15007419
adam would've been a kapo

[Anonymous No.15007572]

>>15007419
Hey OP, i'm back. I have some ideas on how you could fix your fanfiction.
So, for starters, you should try to be a little more subtle with your own bias. I'm not saying you should leave out the political commentary, not at all, but your style here it's too obvious, kinda like what Ayn Rand does on her novels, and no sane person likes those for a good reason. For example, where you wrote "the arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied", you could have left the jewness of the professor implicit, by saying he had a big nose or actually stating his name and lastname. That's out of the top of my head, but you get my drill.
Second, try to not be redundant. "Hitler himself showed up and enacted Enabling Act". That's just painful to read.
Also, as "liberal plague syphilis" ain't a real disease, you should have implied the existence of this illness before. You just can't write about that and pretend that we all know what you're talking about.
Finally, the cameo of Heidegger at the end feels a little contrived, as Heidegger himself was unable to fly. I would keep it out of the final manuscript if i were you.
Despite that, keep it up OP! I liked most of it!

[Anonymous No.15007593]

>>15007419
Hey OP, i'm back. I have some ideas on how you could fix your fanfiction.
So, for starters, you should try to be a little more subtle with your own bias. I'm not saying you should leave out the political commentary, not at all, but your style here it's too obvious, kinda like what Ayn Rand does on her novels, and no sane person likes those for a good reason. For example, where you wrote "the arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied", you could have left the jewness of the professor implicit, by saying he had a big nose or actually stating his name and lastname. That's off the top of my head, but you get my drift.
Second, try to not be redundant. "Hitler himself showed up and enacted Enabling Act". That's just painful to read.
Also, as "liberal plague syphilis" ain't a real disease, you should have implied the existence of this illness before. You just can't write about that and pretend that we all know what you're talking about.
Finally, the cameo of Heidegger at the end feels a little contrived, as Heidegger himself was unable to fly. I would keep it out of the final manuscript if i were you.
Despite that, keep it up OP! I liked most of it!

[Anonymous No.15007604]

>One cannot judge, from an external perspective, that a group is morally unjustified in defining its own identity in a certain way

okay this sounds all well and good, but what if someone invented an identity that's entire ethos was to murder and conquer countless other identities that surrounded them or lived with them? Then we'd have a fucking global war on our hands, where tens of millions could die?

didn't think this one through did you carl.

[Anonymous No.15007608]

>>15007516
I'm a liberal and I found it funny, get a sense of humour incel.

You act like it's a story in all seriousness of the triumph of National Socialism, this feeling may be mixed with it by some but it is funny none the less because it is a parody of itself. Those who believe and don't can find it funny if only they sympathise- which does not mean agree.

But of course the egoist dyke anarchist is a sociopath that can only sympathise with animals.

[Anonymous No.15007629]

>>15007608
>i'm a liberal
>reddit spacing
check's out
btw gtfo of my board, faggot

[Anonymous No.15007663]

[Anonymous No.15007682]

>>15007608
>>15007629
faggots

[Anonymous No.15007686]

>>15007608
>autist

[Anonymous No.15007729]

>>15007604
>identity that's entire ethos was to murder and conquer countless other identities that surrounded them or lived with them?
ok shlomo

[Anonymous No.15007761]

>>15007729
>fascists butcher countless koreans, chinese, poles, russians, romani, english, and frankly too many other nations and races to count
>get called a jew for pointing this out

huh? Can anyone explain this to me? Why do fascists deny that world war 2, a war they unequivocally started, had victims?

[Anonymous No.15007864]

>>15007761
>Japanese were fascists
Chigau yo!
>Why do fascists deny that world war 2, a war they unequivocally started, had victims?
How did WW2 started, anon? Tell me about it!

[Anonymous No.15007918]

>>15007864
>imperialist military dictatorship modeled after prussian military science and allied with the other fascist states
>not fascist
sure.
>how did world war 2 start??
In europe by invading poland and in Asia by invading china of course! Naturally, the fascists committed countless crimes (butchering free Spanish peoples, saber rattling borders, invading Ethiopia, annexing parts of soverign states that surrounded them etc) beforehand, but those were mere preludes to their greater crimes.

[Anonymous No.15007931]

>>15007629
>>reddit spacing
You've just shown yourself to be a newfag.

I was just being uber sneaky so maybe the fly would respond. Now stop getting replying to 4chan posts that annoy you and go get her tiger.

>>15007686
huh?

[Anonymous No.15007964]

>>15007502
can't say that anymore. Normalfaggot word now.

[Anonymous No.15008142]

>>15007918
>imperialist military dictatorship
That's not what fascist means. You could say the same of some stages of the Russian Empire or the Chinese Qing and it would still not be fascist.
>modeled after prussian military science
Again, by these standards you should consider the original German Empire fascist, yet it's not. Hell, Chile to this very day has prussian military science in their army, and they've been trough a military government, still nobody calls Pinochet a fascist seriously.
>allied with the other fascist states
Common mistake, but no, Japan wasn't in the Axis, so it was not part of the alliance. Japan was in the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, their own economic bloc of Asian nations, supposedly created to eradicate occidental imperialism out of Asia. What they had with the axis was a tripartite pact of non-aggression with Italy and Germany. One of the main aspects of the pact was that if one of them got attacked, the other two had to join their war. That's why, when Germany invaded Poland, Japan didn't got involved. Actually, Japan didn't joined the war until the USA attacked Japan after the Pearl Harbor incident (so your later statement of Japan getting into WW2 by attacking China it's technically wrong too, that's actually the second sino-japanese war, which started in 1937, years before WW2 even started).

So yeah, but no anon, you're actually wrong. Saying that Japan was fascist because it was aligned with Germany because the Berlin pact, it's the same to say that Russia was fascist because of the Molotov-Ribbentrop fact.

[Anonymous No.15008161]

>>15007918
>WW2 started [...] In Europe by invading Poland.
This is partially right, but the war started too because of the so called "Anglo-Polish military alliance", offering a protection to the Poles that never arrived. Not only were they unable to protect Poland from Germany, but they didn't offered any assistance to the Poles after WW2 ended, since the country was totally annexed by the USSR in the aftermath. It was a stupid pact that ended up being useless, and dragged the whole world to a stupid war that lasted 6 years. The hands of England were next to the Germans on that.

>the fascists committed countless crimes
So did the allies and the comintern. Nothing new there, as i said, it was a stupid and useless war.
>butchering free Spanish peoples
There you're talking about the Spanish civil war, which started in 1936. I would not consider Franco a fascist, he's more of a national-syndicalist who took the fascism out of Primo de Rivera's original falange, but whatever. The civil war started after the communist second Spanish republic was established. If you read about them, you'll find out stories about how they killed civilians who refused to enter the communal areas they made in the towns, or how they used to castrate priests and throw them to the bullrings to make them run from... well, the bulls. It was pretty fucked up. Then Franco made a counter rebellion, and had assistance of Mussolini and Hitler, which is natural, since the second republic was getting assistance from the USSR. He was pretty nasty too, like deliberately bombarding civil to make a point, but he still did it after the republic was established and did more fucked up shit than him ever did, so you can't blame him on starting it. He even refused to join the Axis later.
>invading Ethiopia
There you're talking about the second Italo-Ethiopian war. You know why it's the second? Because the italians attempted to do the same thing before fascism even existed. They failed the first, and then Mussolini tried again and won. This was, of course, before WW2 even started, en 1935. Now, if you see a map of Africa back from the period, you will see that it was mainly occupied by England, France and Belgium. Would you call those countries fascist too?
>annexing parts of soverign states that surrounded them etc.
Yep, fair enough, that's kind of a good argument. Though Europe was divided after WW1, Germany lost his core territory, and the Italians had what was called the "vittoria mutilata". I'm not arguing in favor of the fascists on these, but you gotta admit that when you fuck up people in the ass for years, it's to be expected that they're going to get bitter and angry about it.

[Anonymous No.15008173]

Imagine if you knew jsut how much you were postulating to mean the things you say.

[Anonymous No.15008245]

>>15007593
You are right: he was a bit clumsy. Regardless, Hitler saw syphilis as a very real political cause. He needs to do better but he does not need to depoliticize syphilis.

[Anonymous No.15008260]

>>15007918
If Germany invading Poland started WW2 then why did Russia invading Poland not start WW3?

[Anonymous No.15008269]

>>15007558
ay fuggedaboutit

[Anonymous No.15008279]

>>15007593
It's a copypasta with changed text newfriend.

[Anonymous No.15008988]

>>15007608
I'm a Schmittian and did not.

[Anonymous No.15009019]

>>15008173
How do you ”postulate” being in a quarantine? Schmitt is completely prescient.

[Anonymous No.15009655]

>>15007516
Pretty funny actually, but you're a fag, SAD!

[Anonymous No.15010873]

brilliant

[Anonymous No.15010882]

>He died of the liberal plague syphilis and was tossed a crematorium.
Will I go to jail if I laughed at that?