>>14953948
Someone already mentioned Valberg's Dream, Death and the Self (glad my years of shilling are finally paying off), which deals with an extremely subtle form of solipsism, the "truth" of which comes about as a consequence of thinking through problems relating to the presence of experience, and the fact of death. Beyond that, there are a number of works that try to grapple with this problem:
Tractatus Logico Philosophicus - Wittgenstein (the solipsism he discusses is best characterized not by "i am alone in the world" but “I have a point of view on the world which is without neighbours". This is important for Valberg's later discussion. Pay attention to what Wittgenstein says about death and time as well.)
On Myself and Other, Less Important Subjects - Caspar Hare (a formalization and explication of whatever property might be involved in granting experience a "first-person presence" and why this property is at once sui generis and ubiquitous and how this seeming contradiction can only lead to the form of solipsism discussed above).
Surviving Death - Mark Johnson (probably the only sustained philosophical discussion and response to Valberg's work that I've seen. Approaches the problem from a religious perspective, at least at first, but there are long sections of the book that try to work through what it means to be at "THE center of the world" and for "your" death to be "THE" death, and whether this is all contingent or necessary).
On Relativity Theory and the Openness of the Future - Howard Stein (somewhat different from the rest, but approaches the problem of solipsism from certain considerations pertaining to the philosophy of physics and special relaivity. Questions the fatalistic interpretation inherent in "block universe" models of time and instead posits a "point-presentism" in which anything outside of "your" light cone is non-existent, which entails a pluralistic form of solipsism not too different from that described above).