[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 54 KB, 300x300, writing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1489169 No.1489169 [Reply] [Original]

I'm looking for more 'master stylists'.

Writers like Nabokov, Conrad, Updike and Fitzgerald.
Who else could be added to that list?

>> No.1489175

Just prose authors?

>> No.1489179

>>1489175
Post whatever or whomever you want, friend!

>> No.1489184

"O illustrious person," said Kai Lung very earnestly, "this is evidently an unfortunate mistake. Doubtless you were expecting some exalted Mandarin to come and render you homage, and were preparing to overwhelm him with gratified confusion by escorting him yourself to your well-appointed abode. Indeed, I passed such a one on the road, very richly apparelled, who inquired of me the way to the mansion of the dignified and upright Lin Yi. By this time he is perhaps two or three li towards the east."

"However distinguished a Mandarin he may be, it is fitting that I should first attend to one whose manners and accomplishments betray him to be of the Royal House," replied Lin Yi, with extreme affability. "Precede me, therefore, to my mean and uninviting hovel, while I gain more honour than I can reasonably bear by following closely in your elegant footsteps, and guarding your Imperial person with this inadequate but heavily-loaded weapon."

I like Bramah.

>> No.1489189

Proust, obviously.

>> No.1489190

Angela Carter
James Joyce

Ted Hughes. Really, most poets write rich, beautifully worded prose. They have a relationship with words and a sense for language that allows them to pluck sounds and meaning from thin air, combining them into incredible pieces of work.

>> No.1489197
File: 350 KB, 1610x1799, ..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1489197

this thread is missing some chabon

>> No.1489202

Bohumil Hrabal

>> No.1489377

>>1489202
Are his English translators able to do justice to his prose?

>> No.1490148

I have a weird soft spot for good prose stylists who frequently express dumb ideas, like Hitchens or Roger Ebert

>> No.1490153
File: 8 KB, 189x267, Wilde.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1490153

strange it took this long

>> No.1490202

Chekhov, Waugh

>> No.1490225

Specific recommendations appreciated.

>> No.1490239

any french author

>> No.1490246

Dodgson.

>> No.1490255

BORGES

>> No.1490316

>>1490255
>>1490255
>>1490255
...who? /lit/ is THE only place I have ever seen mention this guy.

>> No.1490332

>>1490316

Jorge Luis Borges. He's a Argentinian writer often associated with magical realism (think stuff like Gabriel Garcia Marquez's One Hundred Years of Solitude).

I've only read a few short stories, but he's pretty good. Very economical.

>> No.1490341

>>1490316

You serious? He's pretty well acclaimed. Unfortunately he's not European enough for American teens to be introduced to.

>> No.1490362

Samuel Delany's prose is about as rich you're likely to find.

"All you know I know: careening astronauts and bank clerks glancing at the clock before lunch; actresses cowling at light-ringed mirrors and freight-elevator-operators grinding a thumbful of grease on a steel handle; student riots; know that dark women in bodegas shook their heads last week, because in six months prices have risen outlandishly; how coffee tastes after you've held it in your mouth, cold, a whole minute."

Don Delillo's pretty damn good too. And Cormac McCarthy's prose will knock your fucking socks off.

>> No.1490370

Ray Bradbury?

The end of Fahrenheit 451 was pretty damn quotable. What do you think e/lit/ists?

>> No.1490374
File: 4 KB, 114x152, 1255911731437.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1490374

>>1490362
>And Cormac McCarthy's prose will knock your fucking socks off.
Dunno about that.

>> No.1490396

McCarthy
Salinger
Pynchon - definitely has a really distinctive style, will make you realize that DFW is a rip-off on his best days
Toni Morrison - i'm reading beloved right now, and holy fuck can that woman write.

>> No.1490399

>>1490396
>Salinger
I'm a huge Salinger fan, love all his short stories, and still think you're wrong. He's not a style guy, he's a story guy.

>> No.1490405

>>1490396
I became a man the day I revisited the copy of Song of Solomon I skimmed and Sparknoted my way through in high school and went "holy fucking awesome"

>> No.1490409

>>1490316

That's because you're an uncultured plebe.

>> No.1490415

>>1490332

Borges is nothing like GGM. He is often times credited as a major inspiration for the magic realism movement, but his writing is not magic realism.

>> No.1490417

>>1490415
>associated with

>> No.1490420

>>1490415
But he was a major influence of all the artists classified as magical realists. He was also a huge name during the Latin American Boom of the 60s and 70s.

>> No.1490423

>>1490417

>think stuff like Gabriel Garcia Marquez's One Hundred Years of Solitude

no

>> No.1490424

>>1490420

>He was also a huge name during the Latin American Boom of the 60s and 70s.

What does that matter? Not all latin american writers were working in the medium of magic realism.

>> No.1490427

>>1490423

I think that parenthetical is referring to what "magical realism" is, and not Borges himself.

>> No.1490433

>>1490424
That was for the guy who had never heard of Borges before.

>> No.1490436

>have an interested reader inquire about Borges.

>imply that he wrote magic realism

>my face when americans insult my regions greatest writer

>> No.1490440

God I love when a nice /lit/ thread devolves into a miscommunicative spergsplosion. It's like Frasier with people who donated money to the Ron Paul blimp

>> No.1490445

>>1490436
No one has suggested Borges wrote magical realism. One anon mentioned that "he is often associated with" magical realism, which is true. He was a major influence on all the magical realists.

>> No.1490446

>>1490436

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about or are simply trolling. Borges influenced magical realism, and many of his writings could be classified as such, whether you appreciate the genre or not.

His arbitrary academic classification has absolutely no bearing on his quality as a writer. Cry more.

>> No.1490458

Kafka has a very recognizable style, although I must wonder how much is lost or added in translation.

Pynchon has an extremely distinctive style, to be sure.

Camus, for me, always wrote wonderful prose that has a certain love for life and appreciation of beauty that I've yet to find anywhere else.

>> No.1490462

>>1489197
Is he trying to become a better writer of fun genre trash by dressing like one? Next step: the GRRM salty sea captain hat and child pornographer beard

>> No.1490469

>>1490462
There's something wrong with T-shirts now?

>> No.1490474

>>1490469
/lit/ will bitch about anything

>> No.1490475

>>1490469
There is when it's worn over another, longer-sleeved t-shirt. NB: This is a perfectly okay look if you're 13 years old, it's 1999, and you never know how cold it's going to be in second period social studies

>> No.1490476

>>1490409
So not knowing one specific author makes me an uncultured plebe?
This is fantastic news! Oh thank you, dear anonymous poster on 4chan, thank you for opening my eyes, nay, my very mind itself to my horrendous faults! Your honesty and simplicity have raised me from the pits of lugubriation and revealed unto me the folly of me! I am transcending ego and awakening into the pure rapture of knowledge!

Tl:dr, fuck you for looking down on someone you know next to nothing about.

>> No.1490485

welp, this thread went downhill fast.

>> No.1490488

>>1490476

unenthusiastic "cool story bro"

>> No.1490490

>>1490476
He's the most famous author of South America outside of Pablo Neruda. If you only read Europeans or USians or Asians or Africans...naw, even then you should know his name.

>> No.1490494

>>1490475
I hate to break it to you, but this is /lit/.
/fa/ is <<<<thattaway

>> No.1490496
File: 93 KB, 677x335, maximum trolling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1490496

ITT: Pic related

>> No.1490508

I saw an interview with Bolaño once where he complained about coming to the United States and telling people he met that he was a novelist. Nearly everyone, if they could say anything at all, would talk to him about Gabriel García Márquez. Bolaño spent the entire article whining about it. He was soooo offended that people only knew García Márquez and kept bringing him up in conversation.

He came across as a real prick. Yes, it's true, most Americans don't know many South American writers. They were trying as hard as they could to relate to Bolaño and his profession with their small knowledge, to be friendly, and he pissed all over them. What an asshole.

>> No.1490516

Read Evelyn "Fucking" Waugh. One of the great stylists of English prose ever. Brideshead Revisited is an incredible work.

>> No.1490527

>>1490494
Yeah, I shoulda known this would not be a receptive crowd. Just wearing a black t-shirt to hide armpit yellowing is a fashion 10/10 for nerdy high school kids, depressive humanities grad students, and people who want to know some good books with explicit rape scenes in them

>> No.1490537

>>1490527
lol yase the reason we don't want your faboo fashion tips on /lit/ is because we're all neckbeards or rapists

(get out)

>> No.1490555

>>1490409
4chan is a pleb website you moron. Your elitism holds no water here.

>> No.1490557

>>1490527
>>1490527
It doesn't fucking matter how receptive we are, this is a board for literature. If we wanted fashion advice, we'd go to /fa/. BECAUSE THAT'S WHY IT'S FUCKING THERE.
Now please either leave or discuss the actual topic.

>> No.1490572

>>1490557
I was just trying to break up the Borges bitchfight and it all went horribly wrong. SORRY GUYS LET'S ALL GO READ SOME WILLIAM GASS

>> No.1490580

>>1490572
You wanted to stop literature discussion and start fashion discussion? What is wrong with you?

>> No.1490635

Nabokov puts pretty much everyone else to shame, IMO. There are still some authors I need to read, especially the non-English ones, but of what I've read, Nabokov stands head and shoulders above everyone else, at least if you're only looking at prose. Plenty of other authors do other things brilliantly, but I've never read anything that can match Nabokov's prose.

>> No.1490704

>>1490446

>Bmayn of Borges' writings could be classified as magic realism

lol no

Don't talk about matters you have no knowledge of.

>> No.1490730

>>1490704
Yeah the person who introduced me to him by lending me 'Ficciones' said it was magical realism.

People who label it such quite blatantly haven't read it or are idiots.

>> No.1490734
File: 132 KB, 1256x1075, 1290023680446.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1490734

>F3
>no Céline

>> No.1490739

>>1490396
DFW is an improvement on Pynchon IMHO

>> No.1490752

>>1490730

This man wins the thread.

Borges did not write magic realism you dolts. Was he an influence to many of the magic realists? Yes. But, HE WAS AN INFLUENCE TO ALMOST EVERY LATIN AMERICAN WRITER AFTER HIM.

>> No.1490775

J.K.Rowling is pretty good

>> No.1490780

>>1490752
He wins the thread for what? Having a lame anecdote and absolutely no argument?

>> No.1490792

>>1490780

He wins it for calling people who believe Borges wrote magic realism what they are, misinformed idiots.

>> No.1490798

>>1490780
Shits not even up for argument nigga. Borges' writing is not magical realism. FACT Y'ALL

>> No.1490804

According to Angel Flores in Magical Realism in Spanish American Fiction, Borges' Historia universal de la infamia (published in 1935) was his first (not his last) piece of magical realist writing.

>> No.1490893

>>1490792
>>1490798
There's a lot of scholarly debate (read: debate by people who read more widely and think more clearly than you) about whether Borges was simply an inspiration or one of the first true magical realists. It's not clear cut in any away.

>> No.1491024

>>1490798

you's trollin

at the very LEAST, it's up for debate.
really though, why is "magical realist" an insult?
the issue is trifling, at best.

>> No.1491058

i personally think sir thomas more was the founder of the so called magical realism with his "utopia - libellus vere aureus, nec minus salutaris quam festivus, de optimo rei publicae statu deque nova insula utopia"
jorge luis borges' thematic axis made him a legit magical realist novelist.
the already mentioned garcia marques, also

-a phd in literary theory-

>> No.1491081

these faggots...
>>1490792
>>1490798

just got schooled:
>>1491058

>> No.1491086

>>1491058
i find claims about the roots of magical realism / fantasy / science fiction stretching back much before the 19th century pretty questionable, frankly. I think all of those things as literary categories are pretty much founded on the rise of modernism (particularly for F&SF). wrt magical realism, i don't see how you can argue that something like utopia is the founding of magical realism when it (a) doesn't really fit into commonly accepted definitions of magical realism (b) precedes the development of realism in literature by a couple centuries as far as i know

can't wait for your response, this is an interesting topic, not trying to yell at you, just like talking about this. one love, it's all good baby.

>> No.1491089

Hitler, and especially George.W.Bush.

>> No.1491104

>>1491058

It's marquez pendejo.

>> No.1491150

Haven't read much mythology, have you?

>> No.1491154

>>1491086

not responding, i wus just dumb-trolling yall n00b /lit/erats
imma sleeping now

>> No.1492071

At least my thread devolved into a /lit/ related fuckfest. Thanks for all the serious recommendations! More, are of course, welcomed.

>> No.1492221

>>1491104

u made my day cabron

>> No.1492232

>>1492221
You calling me cabron, conjo?

>> No.1492422

>>1491024

still waiting for someone to explain why magical realism is insulting.

>> No.1492568

>>1492422

so... no reasons? pretentious twits.

>> No.1492585

David Foster Wallace.

>> No.1492586

Emily Dickinson? I'm thinking Emily Dickinson.

>> No.1492606

>>1490739
Agreed tbh

>> No.1492614

what if everybody went back and tagged their picks in this thread with an example of their delicious prose?

>> No.1492685

>>1490374
McCarthy is so hit or miss it's shocking.

I used to laugh that he was acclaimed for "The Road" until I realised the guy was like 80 and almost dead, and that they were just trying to give him props before he keels over.

"Blood Meridian" does have incredible prose, but stinkers like "No Country for Old Men" and "The Road"--children could have written that crap.

>> No.1493007

>control-f
>No Faulkner
>Fuck this board.

>> No.1493013

>>1493007

This.

>> No.1493150

I hate when people put Borges in the same category of a merely good writer like GGM. Borges' way of using the language is unique, the best prose stylist of the Spanish language ever.

To me, amongst English language writers - this will be the audacious judgement of an insolent, as I have no formal education in the language and I don't even use it regularly - , the greatest stylist of the 20th century was Evelyn Waugh who I love and Lawrence Durrell, who quickly tires me up. I could add Anthony Powell. A contemporary writer that impresses me is Joan Didion. Candidly, I'll admit that I've always enjoyed William F. Buckley's peculiar style. I reckon there are many English language writers I read translated though.

If I were to start such a list, the first name in it would be Montaigne though.

>> No.1493216

>>1490436
But nobody insulted Cortázar...

>> No.1493220

>>1493150
I sometimes feel like Durrell lays it on too thick, but I only read a small part of Justine, so idk if I'm as qualified as you to make this judgement.

>> No.1493225

GB SHAW, AC DOYLE, PG WODEHOUSE

>> No.1493772

>>1493225
WODEHOUSE FOREVZ

>> No.1493833

the two greatest French prose writers that I'm familiar with would be either Céline; for the remarkable rhythmical quality of his tongue, and for his fascinating juxtapositions between the familiar and the technical; or Flaubert; for the incredible flow of his speech, for the sheer beauty of his images, and for the sound: Flaubert just sounds better than anyone that I've had the chance to read.

as for English, my choices would probably be Melville, Nabokov or Burroughs.