[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1019 KB, 877x2028, 1582994607930.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819644 No.14819644[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Books about why women are complete whores?

>> No.14819651

Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days, the Bible, the Koran, Plato and Aristotle...

>> No.14819659

>>14819644
Her lil panties and her lil toes and her lil feet and her lil head and her lil pussy

>> No.14819662

99% of men live to compete for women' attention, irrespective of the moral behavior of those women.
1% of men try to find something else to value
99% of this 1% go crazy in the woods becoming hermits and failing hard

the 1% of the 1% get good at meditation

99% of those 1% of 1% confuse meditation with enlightenment

so 1% of 1% of 1% of men actually stop being coomers.

>> No.14819689

>>14819659
and I will happily devour all of them.

>> No.14819700

>>14819689
Based

>> No.14819711

>>14819644
>women are complete whores
>god I wanna sniff the shit out of her asshole
>WOMEN are whores tho
lol

>> No.14819725

>>14819651
/thread

>> No.14819727

Humans like sex

>> No.14819730
File: 88 KB, 280x291, this is it wojak.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819730

>>14819644
CAN YOU NOT POST WHORES ON MY BOARD!

Thank you.

>> No.14819733
File: 59 KB, 568x525, Thinking retard pepe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819733

>>14819727
How does one "un-like" sex?

>> No.14819739

>>14819727
kant was celibate his entire life and did not even masterbate throughout his life.

>> No.14819741

>>14819644
Sex and Character, haven't read it but its often said Weininger** is brilliant

>> No.14819748

>>14819727
w*men are not human

>> No.14819754

>>14819748
incels aren't taken seriously

>> No.14819773

>>14819662
Not that cooming is inherently bad. Your father was a coomer and his father before him. Without coomers none of us would be here.

>> No.14819776

>>14819733
you're probably desensitized by now, so even if you think you like sex, you probably can't perform in a real life intercourse considering the amount of tranny porn you've fapped to

>> No.14819778

Who is she?

>> No.14819811

>>14819773
>none of us would be here
I wish

>> No.14819824
File: 238 KB, 1142x1735, 1578624564620.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819824

>>14819733

>> No.14819831

>>14819662
Source?

>> No.14819834

>>14819773
Just because one has coomed does not make one a coomer.

>> No.14819836

>>14819773
Breeding =/= cooming

>> No.14819850
File: 438 KB, 1080x843, 7345734568568.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819850

>>14819831

>> No.14819857

Men are psychopaths.

>> No.14819865

SCUM Manifesto. I'm serious. Unless you're too fragile to face such a challenge to your masculinity, that is.

>> No.14819867

>>14819850
Kek
But you’re still retarded

>> No.14819881

>>14819754
unfortunately

>> No.14819882

>>14819773
>Not that cooming is inherently bad
Wrong
>Without coomers none of us would be here.
Right

>> No.14819884

We let them be since the modern man loves whores since sex is one of our foremost signs of a mans worth currently.

>> No.14819888

>>14819739
So he claims.

>> No.14819889

>>14819865
this and backlash by susan faludi

>> No.14819890

>>14819865
SCUM manifesto is the My Twisted World of feminism

>> No.14819892

It's irrational to pursue women romantically. Anyone who thinks it through logically should be able to come to the conclusion that romantic affection should be reserved only for other men, and that women should be relegated solely to the domain of procreation.

>> No.14819898

>>14819644
>Vilar, E. (1971). The Manipulated Man
>Farrell, W. (1974). The Liberated Man
>Vilar, E. (1976). The Polygamous Sex: A Man's Right to the Other Woman
>Shannon, L. (1986). The Predatory Female: A Field Guide to Dating and the Marriage-Divorce Industry
>Farrell, W. (1988). Why Men Are The Way They Are: The Male-Female Dynamic
>Chinweizu (1990). Anatomy of Female Power: A Masculinist Dissection of Matriarchy
>Farrell, W. (1991). The Myth of Male Power: Why Men Are The Disposable Sex
>Sommers, C. H. (1994). Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women
>Farrell, W. (2000). Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say: Destroying Myths, Creating Love
>Farrell, W. (2005). Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind The Pay Gap – and What Women Can Do About It
>Farrell, W. (2007). Does Feminism Discriminate Against Men? A Debate
>Benatar, D. (2012). The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys
>Vandell, M. (2012). Poor-Sucker Syndrome: The Story about Leeches and the Men that Feed Them
>Sommers, C. H. (2013). The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men
>Smith, H. (2013). Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters
>Devlin, F. R. (2015). Sexual Utopia in Power: The Feminist Revolt Against Civilization
>Kaine, R. (2016). Smart and SeXy: The Evolutionary Origins and Biological Underpinnings of Cognitive Differences between the Sexes
>Giles, D. (2016). Pussification: The Effeminization of the American Male
>Lewis, B. (2017). The Feminist Lie: It Was Never About Equality
>Farrell, W. (2018). The Boy Crisis: Why Our Boys Are Struggling and What We Can Do About It

>> No.14819908

>>14819898
Lol

>> No.14819909

>>14819898
Looks like a pretty cherry picked list

>> No.14819911

>>14819898
Based and redpilled

>> No.14819922
File: 243 KB, 491x439, jimsinging.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14819922

>> No.14819925

The best solution to claims of gender issues is to make a completely male and a completely female society and see how each of them perform without the other obstructing.

>> No.14819936

>>14819925
very reasonable

>> No.14819941

>>14819922
>have gf
>still hate women

Wtf

>> No.14819942

>>14819922
Lol what song is this? Jim was based

>> No.14819944

>>14819941
Wow anon you totally just disproved it! Im sure people here aren't just salty because they are incels

>> No.14819945

>>14819941
You hate your girlfriend?

>> No.14819951

>>14819942
people are strange

>> No.14819952

>>14819941
that's literally impossible anon, if that were true then some men would beat and kill their gfs/wives

>> No.14819953

>>14819890
lol this. the fact anyone in academia takes the delusional ramblings of a violent psychotic seriously is embarrassing.

>> No.14819956

>>14819942
people are strange

>> No.14819959

>>14819942
People are strange

>> No.14819961

>>14819952
they do you dumb cuck. women drive men crazy

>> No.14819966

>>14819961
>thats le joke

>> No.14819972

>>14819953
Valerie Solanas was a repulsive, mentally ill incel just like Elliot Rodgers. She was actually even more of a retarded failure than he was, she couldn't even kill her target, and she was significantly more physically disgusting than he was.

>> No.14819975

Lolita

>> No.14819976

>ignoring that men are 100x as horny

>> No.14819996

>>14819773
breeding is the opposite of cooming you dumb shit

>> No.14820002

>>14819773
Having sex or thinking about sex is morally wrong PERIOD. God only intended it for procreation after marriage. Coomers are all going to hell

>> No.14820010

>>14820002
Go away, priest.

>> No.14820011

>>14820010
What are your thoughts on coomers?

>> No.14820024

>>14820011
If we're basing coomers off of the meme, they're not nearly as insufferable as their miserable counterparts, the incels. As long as they're not shitting up my board with /r9k/ whining, I'm indifferent.

>> No.14820063

>>14819942
people are strange

>> No.14820084

just screwed a broad that probably gave me herpes. weininger was right

>> No.14820091

>>14819944
Correct.

>> No.14820122

>>14819778
https://vm.tiktok.com/gJqbrE/

>> No.14820149

>>14819898
Now THAT'S what I call RESSENTIMENT

>> No.14820156

>>14819776
Can confirm
t. Couldn't get hard with a girl and a tranny

>> No.14820174
File: 32 KB, 297x331, 1581186232705.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14820174

I quit all social media and stopped watching porn but the Jezebels chased me down to /lit/. There is no escape.

>> No.14820181

On the Origin of Species

>> No.14820201

>>14819944
>le icnels xD
I thought this board was clean from n*Rmoid cattle.

>> No.14820205

Honestly, the amount 4chan bangs on about how awful women are, I have to say that my personal experience has never matched up to the insane victimhood complex you guys constantly indulge on here. Most women I've encountered in my life are shitty, but so are most men. And both sides are just as complicit in the degeneracy of hookup culture (it takes two to tango, after all). Why don't you hold men to the same standard?

>> No.14820212

>>14820205
Read theory

>> No.14820240

>>14820205
It's worse for women to be slutty than men but otherwise I agree. I'd take a woman over psychotic incel any day. It's sad that this crap has taken over imageboards.

>> No.14820247

>>14820205
Think it might be because society teaches you that women are pure and not like men and all that shit.
I fully agree with you, the average retard prole is nothing but cattle no matter the gender, i just wish that beating up women wasn't a colossal taboo just like beating up another man.

>> No.14820251

I hate women

>> No.14820285

>>14819644
https://youtu.be/C4JcrIe2Ou0
Pretty much all of literature is to this effect, ultimately.

>> No.14820290
File: 47 KB, 318x457, 4402AEE6-D448-4135-B90D-5BC74D48D496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14820290

>> No.14820307

>>14820240
>I'd take a woman over psychotic incel any day
There are whole websites full of them that you can fuck off to at any time

>> No.14820312

>>14819662
speculation through personal experience. aka projecting.

>> No.14820321

>>14819644
read models by mark manson for a pretty solid blue pill
read rational male for a redpill

>> No.14820325

>>14819730
this, it should be illegal to post threads on /lit/ with roastie op images

>> No.14820334

>>14819739
Based

>> No.14820344

>>14819776
I don't watch porn and never got into it(partially because I don't browse here as regularly as you guys might and the other part because that's just gay) so I'm asking this question from an ascetic perspective but really it was just meant to be a comical pepe remark.

>>14819824
Reading I guess.

>> No.14820349

>>14819773
>Without coomers none of us would be here.
This made me reconsider my views on antinatalism

>> No.14820350

>>14819644
My diary desu

>> No.14820371

>>14819824
Oh for fucks sake it was just that massive script about the guy talking about occult doctors and evil spirits latching onto your sins.

Not that it doesn't have some value but garbage post.

>> No.14820383

>>14820251
I hate that they produce an involuntary sexual and emotional reaction in me. If I were not attracted to them I wouldn't give a fuck about them at all and would never even think about them. It's like there's this worthless, disgusting creature, but it has a hole between its legs so that makes my mind care about it. They have no other value but they have a pussy. I hate that that makes me feel the way it does and I've been trying to mute it.

>> No.14820394

>>14820285
>"wowzass such intellect amazingballs so revealing favs movie seeN!!!!!!!!!"

>> No.14820415

>>14820240
>It's worse for women to be slutty than men
In what sense? Not challenging your point, just curious to know why you think this.

>>14820247
Not all women. Historically, society has enforced a view of women that is dichotomous and static, IE. the madonna/whore complex. From a traditional view there is nothing outside (or between) that binary, when women are certainly far more complicated than that.

>i just wish that beating up women wasn't a colossal taboo
Yeah, I can understand that. (not that I have a particular urge to beat on women, but still). There's a lot of cultural baggage which makes "full" equality practically untenable

>> No.14820431

>>14819942
people are strange

>> No.14820445

>>14820024
>what is self-awareness

>> No.14820513

>>14819944
>le incel
Guys in every social strata say the same thing about women

>> No.14820522

>>14820415
You're right, there's no madonna/whore binary. They're all just whores.

>> No.14820528

sex and character gets memed a lot but it's actually truly and profoundly based, probably the best analysis of pussybrains i've ever read, beats schoppy's on women

>> No.14820537

>>14820522
Can you tell me why women are whores for engaging in hookup culture, but men aren't?

>> No.14820542

>>14820528
show pusy

>> No.14820546

>>14820537
Men are whores.

>> No.14820550

>>14820537
a key many locks good
a lock many keys bad

>> No.14820556

>>14819922
>>14819944
>the world seems unfair when you're exposed to how unfair it is
no shit, someone like him wouldn't have any clue

>> No.14820559

>>14820445
self-awareness is for chumps. I was asked what my thoughts were, and I shared them.

>> No.14820562

>>14820550
Phallogocentric allegories have no bearing on the actual relations between men and women, other than privileging a narrative of male power. Try again

>>14820546
Cool. We're in agreement then.

>> No.14820567

>>14819644
What is it about this girl that makes me want to cum so much? Yes, she has nice breasts. Yes, she has nice thighs. But there is some other quality. Her face. It's her face. She has this borderline goofy look that drives me mad. Why would a goofy, cute face make me want to fuck?

>> No.14820573

>>14820562
it is an obvious fact that women are more picky than men because they are the ones who get pregnant, and typically they have to care more for the child. hence the key/lock metaphor

>> No.14820574

>>14820562
>Phallogocentric allegories have no bearing
Yes they do.

>> No.14820576

>>14820562
>Phallogocentric allegories have no bearing on the actual relations between men and women,
Yes they do

>> No.14820586

>>14820537
Who said I thought that it's okay for men?

>> No.14820589

>>14820383
chemically castrate yourself

>> No.14820590

>>14820562
>Phallogocentric allegories have no bearing on the actual relations between men and women, other than privileging a narrative of male power. Try again
Women's sexuality is based upon being penetrated by a phallus, so yes it does have bearing.

>> No.14820605

where do i go to befriend whorish women. I dont want to fuck them I just want to hang out. they seem like fun to be around

>> No.14820614

>>14820605
just pay a whore to hang out

>> No.14820628

Why is sexuality objectively a bad thing?

>> No.14820632

>>14819733
>How does one "un-like" sex?
Middle Discourses 13
The Longer Discourse on the Mass of Suffering


And what is the gratification of sights? Suppose there was a girl of the brahmins, aristocrats, or householders in her fifteenth or sixteenth year, neither too tall nor too short, neither too thin nor too fat, neither too dark nor too fair. Is she not at the height of her beauty and prettiness?”

“Yes, sir.”

“The pleasure and happiness that arise from this beauty and prettiness is the gratification of sights.

And what is the drawback of sights? Suppose that some time later you were to see that same sister—eighty, ninety, or a hundred years old—bent double, crooked, leaning on a staff, trembling as they walk, ailing, past their prime, with teeth broken, hair grey and scanty or bald, skin wrinkled, and limbs blotchy.

What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?”

“Yes, sir.”

“This is the drawback of sights.

Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister sick, suffering, gravely ill, collapsed in her own urine and feces, being picked up by some and put down by others.

What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?”

“Yes, sir.”

“This too is the drawback of sights.

Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And she had been dead for one, two, or three days, bloated, livid, and festering.

What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?”

“Yes, sir.”

“This too is the drawback of sights.

Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And she was being devoured by crows, hawks, vultures, herons, dogs, tigers, leopards, jackals, and many kinds of little creatures …

Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And she had been reduced to a skeleton with flesh and blood, held together by sinews … a skeleton rid of flesh but smeared with blood, and held together by sinews … a skeleton rid of flesh and blood, held together by sinews … bones without sinews scattered in every direction. Here a hand-bone, there a foot-bone, here a shin-bone, there a thigh-bone, here a hip-bone, there a rib-bone, here a back-bone, there an arm-bone, here a neck-bone, there a jaw-bone, here a tooth, there the skull. …

Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And she had been reduced to white bones, the color of shells … decrepit bones, heaped in a pile … bones rotted and crumbled to powder.

What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?”

“Yes, sir.”

“This too is the drawback of sights.

And what is the escape from sights? Removing and giving up desire and greed for sights: this is the escape from sights.

>> No.14820633

>>14820556
Yes its unfair. Should that mean the government should give everyone a girlfriend just for existing? Are they wrong for not wanting to be with a guy with the sexual value of a wet carrot?

>> No.14820634

>>14820573
Yes and that's all good and well. But in modern society that's gone way too far due to dating apps etc and women are unreasonably picky cunts, the lot of them. Moreover, feminism has lead them to believe they should be free of all the responsibilities and gender roles of the past whilst still expecting men to bear the responsibilities and gender roles that benefit women. They want to have all of this privilege and STILL retain their never-in-history-justified position as an oppressed minority which in turn grants even more privileges. I'm going to join a comfy Christian commune where women know their place.

>> No.14820640

>>14820573
The metaphor overlooks the fact that male virility is entirely contingent on a female receptacle for his seed. Without the "lock", the key is useless. The same goes for any other plug/socket analogy.

Also, if women are more picky than men, then how can they also all be whores?

>>14820590
Yeah, its not like there have been shitloads of studies into female sexuality in the last few decades which have shown that clitoral stimulation and imaginative fantasy is far more important than penetration.

>> No.14820641

>>14819711
based

>> No.14820643

>>>/r9k/

>> No.14820655

>>14820633
>Are they wrong for not wanting to be with a guy with the sexual value of a wet carrot?
Yes, people should be less shallow. But even if I agreed with you, people act like 'incel' is a biting attack that instantly wins you the argument, when in fact the bitterness and anger of incels makes perfect sense. It's like mocking someone for being born blind and finding them reprehensible for being 'salty' about not being able to see.

>> No.14820667

>>14820640
>is far more important than penetration.
For what? Cumming? What makes you think that is the highest end? The phallus and the penetration of the phallus is still one half of what's required for life.

>> No.14820669

>>14820655
Then go date an overweight 32 year old single mother. Youd be shallow not to

>> No.14820670

>>14820640
>Yeah, its not like there have been shitloads of studies into female sexuality in the last few decades which have shown that clitoral stimulation and imaginative fantasy is far more important than penetration.
What you're referring to is what would help them achieve orgasm, which is not what I'm talking about. If their sexuality did not necessitate getting a cock or cock simulacrum shoved in their fuckhole over and over then that wouldn't be the goal of their sexual promiscuity.

>> No.14820678

>>14820667
You specifically said "female sexuality", not "the biological imperative to procreate". These are not the same things, because otherwise women would be pregnant literally all the time.

>> No.14820690

>>14820669
This is a fundamental misunderstanding roasties like you have. You assume that men can get laid at any time if they lower their standards, because women are easily able to do so. The same is not the case for men, especially genuine incels. The 32 year old in question lives in a world seemingly designed by a feminist God where everything is super easy for her. She can and does reject any advances from incels; she can do much better.

>> No.14820696

>>14820669
they'll have to do it for me first to even out all the shallowness ive experienced up to this point :)

besides, i'd get with a fat girl, no problem

>> No.14820699

>>14820678
You are fucking clueless.

>> No.14820705

>>14820670
Sexuality often has very little to do with the act of procreation. I'm not saying that penetration for women isn't desirable, simply that its not the ultimate end of sexual pleasure (which is literally what "sexuality" is concerned with).

>> No.14820712

>>14820705
I'm not playing word games with you, you insipid faggot. Women want to get fucked. If you can't understand that then there's no helping you.

>> No.14820717

>>14820699
Not an argument. If sexuality was so contingent on procreating, how do you explain the existence of fetishes, sub/dom fantasies, BDSM, roleplay and so on? I expect you'll call them degenerate and unnatural, but your equivocation of sexuality and procreation is premised on a naturalist fallacy that simply doesn't hold up.

>> No.14820723

>>14820712
>I'm not saying that penetration for women isn't desirable
Someone needs to tighten up their reading comprehension.

>> No.14820725

>>14820717
Getting fucked =/= procreation, you goddamn mongoloid. There's plenty of technology available which allows women to engage in the act without having any of the consequences.

>> No.14820729

>>14820723
>Passive aggressive, womanish reply
Lol.

>> No.14820736

>>14820640
>>14820705
There're vaginal and clitorial orgasms. So, it depends from woman to woman.

>> No.14820742

>>14820678
>You specifically said "female sexuality"
Where?

>> No.14820750

>>14820725
Still doesn't mean that penetration is the "highest" aspirations of their sexuality, which is the main point I've been contesting. It's such an unconsidered opinion that because babies are made that way, it MUST be the most optimal sex act for women.

>> No.14820753

>>14820736
sounds like bulshit sis-science

>> No.14820755

>>14820750
You're clearly a woman and just whining about how your life doesn't revolve around cock. You aren't fooling anyone.

>> No.14820756

I just wanted a comfy misogynist thread and you autists had to shit it up with this penetration semantics

>> No.14820759

>>14820750
Not who you're responding to but it is the most optimal by the very way you've defined it right here.

>> No.14820768

>>14820753
Virgin spotted.

>> No.14820773

>>14820562
>Phallogocentric
>>>/x/

>> No.14820781

>>14820729
Holy shit cope harder dude. It's not my fault you're illiterate.

>>14820736
This is true, but statistically clitorial stimulation trumps vaginal penetration almost every time, which is why its ridiculous to suggest that women's sexuality holds penetration above all other sexual acts.

>>14820742
see
>>14820590
If it wasn't you, I apologise, but its hardly my fault if you all have identical hivemind opinions.

>> No.14820783

>>14820640
>The metaphor overlooks the fact that male virility is entirely contingent on a female receptacle for his seed.
what on earth are you talking about? The metaphor literally DEPENDS on the female being intrinsically valuable. That is why the male is the key, he can access the valuable thing, whereas it is trivial for the woman to access the male sperm, because it is not at all valuable.

And I never said women are whores, men are much worse whores than women on average.

>> No.14820795

>>14820759
Nope, that's a naturalist fallacy, as I've already stated. Taking what is "natural" as a normative standard is illogical when there are many aspects of nature that are not ideal conditions to live in.

>>14820755
not an argument.

>> No.14820800

>>14820783
Men cant be whores unless you're talking about gay guys who sell their ass