[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 10 KB, 225x225, No-Cars.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14808537 No.14808537 [Reply] [Original]

Looking for some anti-car books or anything adjacent to that sort of thinking. I've heard good things about Jacques Ellul.

>> No.14808554

>>14808537
Ted Kaczynski

ps. Fuck Henry Ford and fuck cars.

>> No.14808556
File: 66 KB, 640x291, hier-ist-sie-die-neue-generation-des-5er-bmw-g30-der-neue-bmw-5er-ist-da-5373.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14808556

sorry but cars always will be better
>comfortable and CLEAN premium leather seats (even with a heating/cooling option) - not filthy plastic/fabric trash filled with aids like on the bus
>you can regulate the AC to your liking - you wont melt in the summer and you wont sweat during winter
>you can put your bagage/jacket comfortably into the trunk/backseat
>when you loose something its still there also no urban youth will steal your stuff
>no disgusting people who havent showered for 2 weeks
>you can listen to your favorite music on your premium bang and olufsen speakers
>hands free idrive bluetooth system allows you to phone everyone with just a few clicks on your stearing wheel - you can have joyful conversations and shout as loud as you want
>if you have a date you can safely bring your girl home and if you happen to own a nice car she will definitely notice it meanwhile taking her home by the bus/train she will think you are some hopeless poorfag
>wont get wet by waiting 40minutes for your next cuckbus in the rain
>enjoy your mass squeezing orgies during rush hour lmao
seriously public transport is inferior and for poorfags lmao

>> No.14808566

>>14808556
Walking is perfectly adequate if you don't live in, work in and depend on an urban shit hole. Enjoy choking on exhausts.

>> No.14808591
File: 58 KB, 287x425, tedkaczynski.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14808591

>>14808537
>127. A technological advance that appears not to threaten freedom often turns out to threaten it very seriously later on. For example, consider motorized transport. A walking man formerly could go where he pleased, go at his own pace without observing any traffic regulations, and was independent of technological support-systems. When motor vehicles were introduced they appeared to increase man’s freedom. They took no freedom away from the walking man, no one had to have an automobile if he didn’t want one, and anyone who did choose to buy an automobile could travel much faster and farther than a walking man. But the introduction of motorized transport soon changed society in such a way as to restrict greatly man’s freedom of locomotion. When automobiles became numerous, it became necessary to regulate their use extensively. In a car, especially in densely populated areas, one cannot just go where one likes at one’s own pace one’s movement is governed by the flow of traffic and by various traffic laws. One is tied down by various obligations: license requirements, driver test, renewing registration, insurance, maintenance required for safety, monthly payments on purchase price. Moreover, the use of motorized transport is no longer optional. Since the introduction of motorized transport the arrangement of our cities has changed in such a way that the majority of people no longer live within walking distance of their place of employment, shopping areas and recreational opportunities, so that they HAVE TO depend on the automobile for transportation. Or else they must use public transportation, in which case they have even less control over their own movement than when driving a car. Even the walker’s freedom is now greatly restricted. In the city he continually has to stop to wait for traffic lights that are designed mainly to serve auto traffic. In the country, motor traffic makes it dangerous and unpleasant to walk along the highway. (Note this important point that we have just illustrated with the case of motorized transport: When a new item of technology is introduced as an option that an individual can accept or not as he chooses, it does not necessarily REMAIN optional. In many cases the new technology changes society in such a way that people eventually find themselves FORCED to use it.)
— Industrial Society and Its Future

>> No.14808620

>>14808591
He's absolutely right. Consider how this also applies to the internet.

>> No.14808628
File: 87 KB, 1000x1000, mens-hybrid-bike-hire-1000x1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14808628

>>14808591
I introduce you to Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, places where one can have good public transport, have access to a car if need be and bicycle paths are everywhere.
Car becomes evil when it's the only viable option.

>> No.14808633

>>14808628
>flat and densely populated areas
Why yes goy, you don't need a car, you can just use a bicycle, it will only take you 5 hours to go grocery shopping, you'll be covered in sweat and you can only take one bag!

>> No.14808642

>>14808633
t. Fatass amerilard who never traveled outside his flyover state

>> No.14808648

>>14808633
Take your meds retard

>> No.14808654

>>14808642
>>14808648
Eurocucks seething

>> No.14808664

>>14808642
>>14808648
I am actually Belgian, and I use my bike daily. It's just retarded when others use Flanders (or the places that you mentioned) as a example to follow, because the conditions are very different. Yes the bicycle is great in Flanders, but it's shit in most places.

>> No.14808670

>>14808654
Imagine being this dense that thinking you cannot walk or cycle for 20 mins a day is freedom.

>> No.14808675

>>14808664
Well, what do you mean? Hills or infrastructure? Nowadays with the advent of electric powered everything hills are absolutely non-issue for lazy fat bastards.

>> No.14808683

>>14808554
Fuck Jews and all hail Henry Ford for exposing the Kikes.

Anyone who is against private transportation loves niggers and wants whites to suffer by being stuffed into trains and buses with niggers, Muslims, and filth...

>> No.14808687

>>14808566
No walking is not adequate, because many of us live in the country surrounded by forest. We drive to work. Fuck cities and the morons who live in them.

>> No.14808690

>>14808683
All well and good but if you think the highways have not ruined your cities, amerigoy, I don't know what to say.

>> No.14808692

>>14808591
Ted is the classic example of a city faggot.

>> No.14808695

>>14808690
Niggers and Jews ruined our cities.

>> No.14808696

>>14808687
>Look at all those retards living 10 minutes away from work while I, a rural man, spent 3 hours a day in my lifted brotruck and enjoy my freedom

>> No.14808699

>>14808675
I just mean that functioning with a bicycle as a main transportation mode is impossible for most people, since they have to cover big distances and kids and old people can't bike if it's not flat. Plus cars are still needed for many professionals.

>> No.14808703

>>14808695
Niggers were the proxy warriors used by jews, yes, but the highways have fucked your cities too.

>> No.14808706

>>14808696
Seethe more city faggot. Cities should be banned. Jewish hell holes.

>> No.14808710

>>14808699
Well of course, hence why I said you can have it all if it's properly managed. It doesn't have to be only car, only bus, only bicycle.

>> No.14808718

>>14808703
I don’t care about cities. I’d bomb them all if I could.

>> No.14808722

>>14808706
Seethe for what? That I'm living close to all amenities and work, have an option to use public transport, a bicycle or my car and spend minimum time commuting to work safely because my euro city have not been overrun by niggers and socially engineered to oblivion which led to previous generations of my family to move out into the countryside just to get away from niggers?

>> No.14808752

>>14808722
Currently I live 4 minutes from work. I can walk to work. Actually I do walk to work. I own two cars, and even a bicycle.

I’m a car enthusiast. My family owns property out in the woods which includes our family home. The true land of my family which is our living space.

I hate cities. None of your proposals will work while the Jews are in power. They will only use it to make our lives more miserable.

>> No.14808762

>>14808752
>I’m a car enthusiast
I can't even imagine what it's like to be this much of a cuck for modernity. At least you admit cities are shit holes I supposed. It's a shame you don't realise the proliferation of automobiles is responsible for the shit holeisation of the entire world.

>> No.14808778

>>14808762
A cuck for modernity huh?

Maybe if I was a blue pilled naive buffoon like you I would stand around blaming cars for all my problems instead of the real problem: Jews.

I know you are jealous of people who can afford cars. It’s understandable. If it wasn’t cars you’d be complaining about my horses, and all the shit on the sidewalk.

>> No.14808785

>>14808752
>I’m a car enthusiast.
I like cars as well and I live in a city but thinking that automobile has not damaged the society is uneducated at best, retarded at worst despite what you think about cities.
Do you feel such great animosity towards trains as well?
Look up at what happened to trains in the UK in 60s. I'm not even from there yet it makes me feel sad for their country. And because of what? Because cars are more profitable, building roads that require constant maintenance is something that makes the economy look good on paper. Makes my blood boil just thinking about it.

>> No.14808791

>>14808778
It's the Jews and the protestants who support the Jews. Look at yourself in the mirror.

>> No.14808813

>>14808785
Look, let me explain. When someone exposes the Jews, their policies are exposed as well.

One of the biggest problems is overpopulation. Being cucked by Jews, means that the west cannot use eugenics to cull the populations of 3rd world countries or even their own and we cannot limit automobile manufacturing because that too would undermine big Jewish owned companies profit margins.

>> No.14808830

>>14808785
I’m not saying that cars are not a problem. They just aren’t the source of the problem like you seem to be implying. It’s obvious who’s pushing the societal ills in the west for own destruction.

I wouldn’t mind if large cities made public transportation mandatory and have cars coming into the city park at designated ports.

This however is only going to work in a country using one race. I can only see this working in White or Asian countries.

It will absolutely not work right now, and would be dangerous in the current nigger filled hellholes that are our wonderful cities today.

>> No.14808832

>>14808813
Overpopulation? You must be shitting me. I thought this was /lit/ not pol.
Biggest car manufacturers in the world are GM, Toyota and VW. Non of those companies are being run by Jews.
You seem to be confused.

>> No.14808839

>>14808830
I'm not implying cars are the source of all problems, it's just a problem. All I can say in regards to American cities is I feel for you brother. Your cities have been slaughtered.

>> No.14808851

>>14808832
They are absolutely run by Jews. Each company must follow the laws created by Jewish politicians and meet quotas for consumer consumption... another problem indeed.

You think overpopulation is not a problem? It absolutely is. You can not argue against it. Cars only make overpopulation worse.

>> No.14808891

>>14808851
>You think overpopulation is not a problem?
Not where I'm from it's not.

>> No.14808966

>>14808891
Ah yes, just because you can’t immediately see it when you step outside does not mean it doesn’t exist elsewhere in the world.

Be thankful you don’t live in a place like that.

>> No.14809354

>>14808537
ask /n/. based and cagepilled.
>>14808556
>waah
>waaaah
>i'm fat, lazy, and scared of everything! i'm also stupid and forgetful!
>please mr shekelburg, let me give you enough money to buy a substantial investment portfolio with, just keep the scary darkies away from me and don't make me walk several whole blocks!
yikes.