Banning women from writing literature might actually save it

[Anonymous No.14802188]

>women ruined art & sexual orientations with their identity politics shit
>women ruined literature with their shitty self-insert omnisexual vampire erotic fanfictions
>women ruined music, music videos and youtube with their constant attention whoring and self-objectification

Is there something women don't fucking ruin with their touch? At this point I'd expect huge improvements in the literature field once women become a minority or stop writing anything at all. This isn't groundless incel screeching, it's plain and simple truth, if you have any doubts name one thing women DIDN'T ruin through the course of history. It's like women are natural born destroyers and it's in their DNA to spoil everything men work so hard to turn into art.

[Anonymous No.14802202]

>>14802188
Okay incel. once you get out of your moms basement and actually have sex with a woman you will see how stupid and cringe this post is

[Anonymous No.14802211]

>>14802188
t. asperger incel

[Anonymous No.14802216]

>>14802202
Not OP but I've had sex before and OP is pretty spot on. Women ruin everything they've touched, even women admit this. Listen to Camille Paglia rant about women. Women wanted sexual liberation and what do they do with it? They act irresponsibly and accuse men as being rapists for a woman's personal irresponsibility. Women are better off as property, they are not responsible enough to take care of themselves. Imagine what being a second-class citizen without any major responsibilities throughout all of human history does to your brain. Women
just lack the mental faculties of responsibility and self awareness that men have.

[Anonymous No.14802220]

>>14802216
>i-i-i-ve had sex before i s-swear
cope aspiecel

[Anonymous No.14802221]

>>14802188
Leave this board if you haven't read each of the following works of literature:
The Complete Poems of Sappho
The Tale of Genji
The Pillow Book
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
The Mysteries of Udolpho
Pride and Prejudice
Mansfield Park
Emma
Frankenstein
Uncle Tom's Cabin
Aurora Leigh
Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl
Goblin Market and Other Poems
Little Women
Poems: Three Series, Complete by Emily Dickinson
Wuthering Height
Jane Eyre
The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
Middlemarch
Mrs. Dalloway
To the Lighthouse
A Room of One's Own
The Waves
Gone with the Wind
The Diary of a Young Girl
The Second Sex
To Kill a Mockingbird
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Ceremony
Kindred
July's People
Love Medicine
The Handmaid's Tale
Beloved
Kitchen
Gender Trouble
The Joy Luck Club
Sexual Personae
Blonde
White Teeth
NW
Feminism is for Everybody
The Vegetarian
The Song of Achilles
Circe
Ducks, Newburyport

[Anonymous No.14802224]

>>14802221
Based. lit has always been a feminist board. Incels can fuck off

[Anonymous No.14802227]

>>14802220
No amount of evidence is good enough for you. I have a picture of my cock next to my ex-girlfriend's ass and I'm not stupid enough to show that to you. As soon as I prove I've had sex the goal post will move to "wow but you haven't had sex with 10 women" or "you haven't had sex with a 10/10 perfectly fit model." I've already spent too much time engaging in your stupid game. Address and counterargue anything I've mentioned in that previous post or get ignored.

[Anonymous No.14802233]

>>14802221
Autistic women and women who admit to men's superiority are automatically disqualified if this is a list attempting to prove women are equal.

[Anonymous No.14802239]

>>14802202
How the fuck are you gonna assume I'm an incel if I'm not attracted to women in the slightest?

[Anonymous No.14802243]

>>14802239
Ah so you chose the Gay path because you couldnt get laid by a woman. Incels really are desperate

[Anonymous No.14802247]

>>14802233
the point of that post was to at least name drop literature in this blatant /r9k/pol/ bait thread

it's incredibly telling that you chose a blanket criticism of all the works rather than expressing criticism in a way that proves you're even capable of reading

[Anonymous No.14802259]

>>14802247
Yikes, you're retarded. What I said wasn't a criticism of the authors themselves, and it wasn't a blanket statement as it only applies to some of them. Keep reading your Ducks, Newburyport though, simp.

[Anonymous No.14802261]

>>14802243
>so you chose the Gay path
Wrong.
>because you couldn't get laid
Sex is the last thing on my mind, but keep coping, you're probably letting your wife's boyfriend fuck her as you type your reply.

[Anonymous No.14802269]

>>14802261
>i-i-i d-dont care about sex
>i-i-im not even attracted to women
fuck this is a cope if I have ever seen one

[Anonymous No.14802282]

>>14802269
>>i-i-i d-dont care about sex
Yeah, on the other hand it seems like sex lives in your head rent free
>>i-i-im not even attracted to women
Projecting much

[Anonymous No.14802324]

>>14802188
Actually that makes sense
>we now have everyone and their mothers writing a book
>too many books
>this is largely because we allowed women to write, and we've got nearly nothing good out of it since

[Anonymous No.14802328]

>>14802188
Based. Don't worry about seething redditors

[Anonymous No.14802394]

>>14802216
>Imagine what being a second-class citizen without any major responsibilities throughout all of human history does to your brain
This was the poor throughout the whole time since there has been poor and up to now. How are women to blame? The fact is that movements get "ruined" because of mediatic smear campaigns intent on maintaining the status quo and allowing only slight deviation (so that your dumb monkey brain can tell itself 'at least we live better than we did X years ago!').
Your braincel spiel has absolutely no connection to reality, only to the media bubble you exist in. You're an angry white boy and you're being farmed, you faggot, you're being manipulated into turning against 50% of the population.

[Anonymous No.14802628]

bunch of basedfaggots in this thread, wow. If you can't look at birth control, women voting, sexual "liberation", breakdown of the family unit/celebration of single mothers, etc and see that women definitely are fucking things up you're an idiot. I love women, and there are outliers that don't fit that mold, but women as a whole will be the downfall of society if left with no checks and balances like they are right now. they've already let destroyed culture, it's just the institutions themselves that still stand in their most base forms.

[Anonymous No.14802631]

>>14802202
Not an incel, but all women have is their pussy and ass. Its their only weapon. Take it and you will break them

[Anonymous No.14802647]

>>14802188
Any arguments why women ruined everything ?

[Anonymous No.14802657]

>>14802202
Eat feet

[Anonymous No.14802672]

>>14802224
Kill yourself simp

[Anonymous No.14802673]

>>14802647
the absolute state of pop culture is a more than valid argument

[Anonymous No.14802681]

>>14802261
>sex is the last thing on my mind
>WOMEN ARE STUPID AND THEY ARE USELESS
okay dude

[Anonymous No.14802697]

>>14802681
>>WOMEN ARE STUPID AND THEY ARE USELESS
Yes, yes, they are. Do you see as many male sex workers as female e-thots around? The thing is, the career of a woman depends exclusively on sex and how many men she's bedded in her lifetime. Women retaliate for their lack of skills with blowjobs and endearing words, but that doesn't make them any more skillful than men, as most of the time they turn out to be abysmally inferior to their male counterparts.

[Anonymous No.14802749]

>>14802673
>pop culture
lmao a literal woman complaining about other women

[Anonymous No.14802839]

>Your braincel spiel has absolutely no connection to reality, only to the media bubble you exist in. You're an angry white boy and you're being farmed, you faggot, you're being manipulated into turning against 50% of the population.

[Anonymous No.14802854]

>>14802839
Why don't you actually try refuting the argument? Or do you know that you can't?

[Anonymous No.14802862]

>Why don't you actually try refuting the argument? Or do you know that you can't?

[Anonymous No.14802866]

>>14802631
>no tits
ok faggot

[Anonymous No.14802875]

>>14802697
do you look for male sex workers? if you spent literally 1 minute doing so you'd find more than a disgusting amount of men whoring themselves out on the internet as well.
if you cared to look beyond your weird worldview you'd see that shit is a result of income inequality and disenchantment than "WOMEN SUK HURR"

[Anonymous No.14802892]

>>14802188
You know, you could be a motivating force if you were a talented writer, but chances are you’re not. Post an excerpt from your as-yet unpublished novel and then we can decide if you’re in any sort of position to make all these claims. I highly doubt it’s the fault of women if you’re a shitty writer.

[Anonymous No.14802894]

>>14802892
>motivating
*Mitigating

[Anonymous No.14802895]

>>14802875
>if you spent literally 1 minute doing so you'd find more than a disgusting amount of men whoring themselves out on the internet as well.
And yet they will never be as many as the countless ethots on chaturbate and various porn websites. Not to mention I never heard of a single male Twitch thot that reached mainstream audience, meanwhile belle delphine is still raking in six figures by selling her fucking bath water.
>a result of income inequality and disenchantment than "WOMEN SUK HURR"
https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/women-are-struggling-to-find-men-who-make-as-much-money-as-they-do/
stop regurgigating buzzfeed memes and realize that women have everything set for them from the get-go. The reason there are so few homeless women compared to men is because women can always resort to whoring themselves and find a guy who'd fuck them in exchange of a hefty sum, yes, even the ugliest specimen and the fattest genetic abominations, look up Juggernaut Law.

[Anonymous No.14802897]

>>14802188
>Banning women from literature would save it
"Save" is a bit sensationalist. It would probably improve it, but it wouldn't be possible without some crazy dictator enforcing it, which would probably end up blocking other literature from being published. Also, there are women that write good books too.
>>14802202
>Incel
I feel like this insult is such a gamble. If it doesn't happen to be true then the offense just falls apart.

[Anonymous No.14802904]

>>14802188
Women get swindled by whatever is told to them
You should be looking at (((who))) exactly they are

[Anonymous No.14802911]

>>14802904
Last time I checked Dickinson wasn't backed up by any greedy jew and still managed to compose the most awful poems ever written. You can sperg out all you want about jews but the nature of women is beyond jewish control.

[Anonymous No.14802923]

>>14802915
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11787304/Homelessness-is-a-gendered-issue-and-it-mostly-impacts-men.html
virtually every research will lead to the same conclusion, men are more affected by homelessness than women have ever been

[Anonymous No.14802944]

>>14802895
My ghott the ressentiment of this post is almost palpable. Imagine thinking Belle Delphine is a good metric to judge all women by lmao

[Anonymous No.14802951]

>>14802944
She's the icon of the an entire generation of roasties, and if you're implying the average woman in 2020 isn't into unprotected sex with strangers and hookups you must live under a cave.

[Anonymous No.14802965]

>>14802951
I don’t live in a cave, I just associate with a better class of woman than you. And besides, casual hookup culture is not a stick you can beat women only with, since it takes two to tango, and plenty of men engage in it too. Why is that acceptable, but not for women?

[Anonymous No.14802970]

>I don’t live in a cave, I just associate with a better class of woman than you. And besides, casual hookup culture is not a stick you can beat women only with, since it takes two to tango, and plenty of men engage in it too. Why is that acceptable, but not for women?

[Anonymous No.14802980]

>>14802970
I’m sorry if you’ve been fucked over by roasties in your life, but it’s not my fault (not the fault of women in general) if you’re a poor judge of character.

[Anonymous No.14802983]

>>14802965
>Why is that acceptable, but not for women?
Different anon, but it's not. All who engage in that business hurt themselves and others. The venom some put in it is misplaced, though. We should feel sad for them and hope whatever issue causing that behavior will be resolved.