The 20 year old Whomer

[Anonymous No.14793136]

Is "whom" obsolete? Have people used who wrongly enough that we can stop thinking about who/whom?

[Anonymous No.14793159]

The degradation of language is something to be lamented but at the same time I don't want to be one of those faggots.

[Anonymous No.14793177]

>>14793136
these fucking things keep getting worse

[Anonymous No.14793191]

If you use it correctly people rarely notice
Most people actually have some qualitative contextual understanding of the difference between the two but haven't clearly defined it enough to naturally choose the correct one or determine the validity of individual cases

Honestly though, this all just stems from the completely retarded ways we teach grammar to American kids. The fact that most people only ever see a phrase structure diagram if they choose to take linguistics in college is unforgiveable, that's one of the most useful visual intuitions you can instill in someone hoping to understand grammar and easily cuts through any subject/object ambiguity (I honestly don't blame people for confusing the two given how poorly the difference is often communicated)

[Anonymous No.14793211]

>>14793177
you already said that, and I found OP funny regardless

[Anonymous No.14793229]

based: laugher
cringe: anything else

[Anonymous No.14794076]

>>14793177
This one is actually great. You just haven't read the necessary literature to appreciate it. Get filtered pseud.

[Anonymous No.14794180]

>>14793177
This one is hilarious.

[Anonymous No.14795722]

>>14793229
that's actually pretty good

[Anonymous No.14795726]

>>14793136
Congrats you just killed the meme.

[Anonymous No.14795735]

>>14793177
CanAm missing persons is serious shit.

[Anonymous No.14795746]

>>14793136
In most cases the correct usage is "whomst't've"