/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14758613]

Destiny vs Vaush
Which one is /ourguy/?

[Anonymous No.14758615]

>>14758613
neither uwu

[Anonymous No.14758616]

>>14758613
not literature. enjoy your ban :)

[Anonymous No.14758629]

>>14758616
Your kind belong on twitter

[Anonymous No.14758635]

>>14758629
Imagine coming all the way from reddit to post this.

[Anonymous No.14758652]

Give me the basic gestalt. I will never watch it

[Anonymous No.14758653]

striker

[Anonymous No.14758655]

>>14758652
It's 20 mins. Destiny goes off yelling like an autist and picks up boomer politics.

[Anonymous No.14758657]

>>14758613
The one who doesn't shill his shitty podcast on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.14758661]

>>14758629
Twitter can be quite kino.

[Anonymous No.14758673]

>>14758613
I predict destiny is gonna pull a Peterson move and will admit that he's severely addicted to some medication.

[Anonymous No.14758685]

>>14758655
Does he manage to make Vaush come across as not massively retarded
by comparison because that would be some accomplishment

[Anonymous No.14758692]

>>14758613
Dunno much about the manchild gamer youtube circles, but from what I've seen, Destiny is rather quick witted and well articulated, a decent sophist. Whereas the fat guy is just another dumb left-liberal, incapable of entertaining different ideas.

[Anonymous No.14758694]

Vaush and Destiny both dislike reading so there is no point discussing them.

[Anonymous No.14758793]

>>14758692
>Destiny is rather quick witted and well articulated

[Anonymous No.14758801]

>>14758613
>pedo vs self confessed cuck
idk senpai

[Anonymous No.14758809]

>>14758613
neither

[Anonymous No.14758838]

>>14758613
Destiny is such a SEETHING cunt! He literally bans people for ANYTHING LMFAO! Fuck you Destiny, you can't BAN me here, COOMER. Also, tell JadetheJaguar to go on the Rajj Royale show more, I want to see her tits more.

[Anonymous No.14758841]

>>14758838
cringe

[Anonymous No.14758843]

>See what I did there? That was hyperbole.
That was the most reddit shit, Destiny lost just for saying that shit.

[Anonymous No.14758850]

>>14758841
Are you that Pascal cunt!? I FUCKING HATE YOU, YOU SUCK! I hope you get you face fucked!

[Anonymous No.14758851]

Ecelebfags are the worst

[Anonymous No.14758891]

>>14758613
Didunt destini get btfo by an 70 old niiger

[Anonymous No.14758906]

>>14758891
It was dare I say... amazin'?

[Anonymous No.14758913]

I stopped watching after 5 minutes it's just the two of them yelling over eachother. Also vaush is one of the few YouTube leftists that is not insufferable and can make edgy jokes without shitting himself in fear of getting cancelled, i like him

[Anonymous No.14758973]

>>14758673
pussy

[Anonymous No.14758982]

>>14758906
BEYDA

[Anonymous No.14759002]

>>14758906
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m57l9U6wsyM

[Anonymous No.14759006]

I don't know who the other guy is but Destiny is as lame and predictable as possible. You say a regular poor guy has trouble moving and Destiny will turn that into "a war veteran with 27 children" just to make what you said seem ridiculous. That's how he argues and if you're not prepared for it you can easily be led by the nose because he does that consistently and it's exhausting. It's sophistry.

[Anonymous No.14759051]

Destiny went full radical centrist he is cringe. He likes corporate shills like Bloomberg, Biden, and Pete Buttplug over Sanders like wtf.

[Anonymous No.14759056]

>>14758613
Why doesn't Destiny just fuck Brittney Venti? She clearly needs it.

[Anonymous No.14759063]

>>14758793
Yes

[Anonymous No.14759066]

>>14759056
She needs a big mutt cock, like mine

[Anonymous No.14759096]

Wasn't Vaush the retarded fatso that got extremely agitated debating I, Hypocrite? If it's him, the other guy has to be mentally impaired not to drag him to the ground, but knowing youtube, that was probably the case.

[Anonymous No.14759157]

>>14758613
Destiny is cringe but he had the balls the debate AltHype so I like him over Vaush

[Anonymous No.14759187]

>>14759157
I was genuinely surprised by how civil he was in the **** enoch debate.
You think if there were a person worthy of Destiny's trademark disingenuous gish galloping and argument dismissing it would be someone of low moral character like Peinovich.

[Anonymous No.14759204]

Neither fuck you

[Anonymous No.14759223]

The whole e-debate and political YouTube scenes make me so damn cynical.

[Anonymous No.14759274]

>>14759002
It's like he dumped his intelligence stat and maxed out his wisdom.
Truly a fascinating build.

[Anonymous No.14759280]

>>14759051
"Centrist" is a dumb reddit term.
Destiny is simply a liberal.

[Anonymous No.14759323]

>>14759063
>Yes

[Anonymous No.14759350]

>>14759280
Considering he's refered to himself and his fans as "the true centrists." I'd have to disagree.

[Anonymous No.14759373]

>>14759280
I'd classify him as neoliberal.
From what I gather, he believes that collective capital rights > individual rights.

I remember hearing him try to justify that Apple using slave labor in China was good because it made a cheaper iPhone. A liberal wouldn't agree with that, but a neoliberal would.

[Anonymous No.14759377]

>>14759350
The faggot manlet is a textbook narcissist. It's useless to evaluate his beliefs from outside the lens of his narcissism. He will hold whatever beliefs attract him the most attention in the moment to feed his narcissism and provide him with opportunities to engage in public spectacle disputes for even more attention. He is not a man of character, merely a vessel driven by an addiction to praise and validation. He is the intellectual form of an e-thot.

[Anonymous No.14759402]

>>14758613
Vaush. Neoliberal Destiny is embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.14759409]

Wait... people here actually watch eceleb debates?

[Anonymous No.14759428]

>>14759402
Based.

[Anonymous No.14759440]

>>14759409
Yes.

[Anonymous No.14759465]

>>14759409
>wait.. you mean 4channers aren't intergalactical mongol monks that practice zebrah piss intermittent fasting, high intensity interval training and semen retention?
no fucking way

[Anonymous No.14759479]

>>14759402
There is nothing wrong with neoliberalism

[Anonymous No.14759490]

>>14759377
Proof?

[Anonymous No.14759512]

>>14759223
the only podcast that's not completely retarded is the tekwars stuff by kantbot. I used listen to some of density's debates couple of years ago. But the cuban midget's nihilism and the fact that he surrounded himself with people like Vaush who literally got his fanbase from d-boys subreddit, and Cenk's nephew who is a champagne LA communist preaching about Praxis while trying to get more viewers for his uncle's network made me question el cubanitos brain power.

[Anonymous No.14759518]

The "socialist" types have no chance of winning against liberals unless they start promoting socially conservative values or illiberal systems, like China for example.

[Anonymous No.14759533]

>>14759518
the bugmen are literally executing pets as we speak, how can chinese PR image ever recover after HK riots, bat-soup and now killing pets?

[Anonymous No.14759564]

this is what /lit/ has fucking become
people discussing which youtuber they like best

[Anonymous No.14759584]

>>14758613
I imagine hell as being forced to watch Breadtube/Sciencefag videos on loop for eternity

[Anonymous No.14759591]

>>14758613
Destiny is the epitome of a pseud.

[Anonymous No.14759605]

>>14759533
>how can chinese PR image ever recover
Chinese arms and wealth will bring the Chinese image back to it's golden height.

[Anonymous No.14759608]

>>14759479
You're joking right?

[Anonymous No.14759609]

>>14758613
I guess Vaush. Leftism is dumb but Centrism is caved in head retarded

[Anonymous No.14759617]

Jesus these men argue like women. How many people watch these faggots?

[Anonymous No.14759628]

>>14759617
I watch Destiny because he has a woman's name.

[Anonymous No.14759646]

>>14759479
Why should collective capital have more rights than the individual?
If a bank and I both commit the same crime, why do I go to jail and the bank just has to pay a inconsequential fine (if that).

[Anonymous No.14759668]

>>14759646
How could a bank commit the same crime as a person? Do you mean a person who owns a bank or what?

[Anonymous No.14759729]

>>14759617
women are not people, so very few. but lots of NPCs watch them

[Anonymous No.14759730]

>>14759668
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hsbc-probe/hsbc-to-pay-1-9-billion-u-s-fine-in-money-laundering-case-idUSBRE8BA05M20121211

No one who owned the bank went to jail. None of the shareholders, I don't think any of the board appointed managers.
Meanwhile if I got caught laundering money to drug cartels, I probably wouldn't be talking to you right now.

[Anonymous No.14759751]

>too bad bro i know your friends and family are important but your landlord's rent is due move out or die
was DENSEity always a neoliberal?

[Anonymous No.14759752]

>>14759646
The bank is more important than you. Also this is not a tenet of neoliberalism.

[Anonymous No.14759759]

>Literature?

[Anonymous No.14759763]

>>14759751
>Nooooooo what do you mean I can’t stay on someone’s property for free against their consent?

[Anonymous No.14759772]

>>14759752
>The bank is more important than you.
>this is not a tenet of neoliberalism
You're either jewish or retarded.
Or both.

[Anonymous No.14759785]

>>14759763
In many places you practically can. Liberals make it so difficult to evict people and then they'll turn around and wonder why the rent is so high or an unpaid parking ticket from 20 years ago disqualifies people.

[Anonymous No.14759793]

>>14759772
Neoliberalism is just supply-side neoclassical economics. Banks are believed to be useful, sure, but no necessary. Capital can be funded through investors and not banks.

[Anonymous No.14759795]

>>14759646
Because it's harder to put a building in jail.

[Anonymous No.14759797]

Destiny is an unironic /pol/tard

[Anonymous No.14759805]

>just move out of the home you were born and raised in bro
>just leave all your friends and family and any local social bonds you had
desnity owns rental properties doesn't he?

[Anonymous No.14759810]

Vaush is an authoritarian communist larping as an anarchist

[Anonymous No.14759818]

>>14759810
actually he's just a fat h*mo lmao

[Anonymous No.14759821]

>>14759797
He just annoys me with his myopic takes and his inability to criticize the left when it deserves it. He literally had a commie uprising in his subreddit that's why Vaush who was sending unsolicited dick-picks to chicks got booted the fuck out. The fat commie samurai should shut the fuck up. And destiny has no one but himself to blaim for creating this obese shitter.

[Anonymous No.14759829]

>>14759805
>what is the internet
Also why should people have the right to infringe on others’ pursuit of happiness when those others want to move and raise the property value of a neighborhood?

[Anonymous No.14759857]

Wait a minute, cheaper, rural areas actually have even less job opportunities than the high cost of living, dense cities. How is moving out a reasonable solution to poverty?

[Anonymous No.14759875]

I tried to watch Destiny but it was too annoying. Dude was trying to argue why starting with the Greeks was irrelevant to trying to do philosophy.

[Anonymous No.14759913]

>>14759797
Not really. Even though /pol/ is more like /b/ nowadays, there are still many who are for nationalism and for social conservatism, two things that Destiny is against.

[Anonymous No.14759916]

>>14759875
He annoys the fuck out of me sometimes. It's good that he exist though, to challenge the right wing ideas. But still, he can be the most insufferable faggot in existence sometimes.

[Anonymous No.14759932]

>>14759916
What do you mean challenge right wing ideas?

Destiny is literally the reason I am a right winger instead of conservative. He made me realize there isn't a single rational person on the left. This is the best they can do and it is nothing but hot air.

[Anonymous No.14759937]

>>14759875
Destiny is retarded but that is right

[Anonymous No.14759951]

>Density literally says moving is not hard
what the fuck???

[Anonymous No.14759975]

>>14759951
>capable of navigating to a literature discussion board on a semi-niche website reviled by mainstream media
>incapable of fathoming a life in which one does not live paycheck to paycheck
who am i quoting and what did he/him mean by this

[Anonymous No.14760019]

>>14759937
>thinking you can truly understand a subject without learning about its historical roots and how it ended up that way

[Anonymous No.14760053]

>>14759951
Life is hard. Some people are luckier than others. Is whining about these basic facts everything you people can do? Why don't you try to come up with solutions and see how solving this is not easy?

If you want the state to take care of people more, then the state also needs more control over people's lives and that would honestly suck.

[Anonymous No.14760147]

>>14759479
Ah yes Healthcare isn't a human right. Markets are the ethical position. Corrupt people taking money from billionaires is fine.

[Anonymous No.14760155]

Destiny is right, many people aren't mature enough to have a conversation about giving up their home.

It's incredibly frustrating to ever try to have any conversation about the realities of someone's situation without fucking sea lions coming out of the wood work making snarky remarks about how you're casting blame and excusing the system.

Telling someone who is adding $200 a month to their credit card debt while approaching being maxed out that they should consider moving to some place more affordable is not a condemnation on their character and we should be able to say that ignoring that situation or the workable solutions is bad or even stupid. We should be able to talk about giving up things that are important to the individual if it means a better outcome for them, like say avoiding bankrupcy and being evicted anyway. None of these discussions excuse the poor state of our real estate market or condemn the individual for having to live in them. We should be able to have these conversations...

... without a fucking horde of sea lions calling you a dirty capitalist.

[Anonymous No.14760200]

>>14760147
Why would it be and why would socialist systems be better at providing it?
They are
Not a tenet of neoliberalism.

[Anonymous No.14760231]

>>14760200
>Why would it be
If you are poor and die sucks for you. This is the ethical position to take right.

>why would socialist systems be better at providing it?
I never said a socialist system would be better.

>They are
They aren't

>Politicians taking money from billionaires is fine.
How about now

[Anonymous No.14760269]

>>14760231
> I never said a socialist system would be better.
Then what is your solution?
> If you are poor and die sucks for you.
Why?

[Anonymous No.14760280]

>>14760269
>Then what is your solution?
Healthcare in a capitalist system? Who is talking about socialism

>Why?
Why is healthcare not a right? Better question to ask.

[Anonymous No.14760311]

I'm from Easter Europe. Was a major poorfag, lived on a farm raising chickens and growing potatoes. Had no money at all, no jobs there.

Moved to the UK and now I'm middle class with a degree.

This is a retarded argument though, like yeah some people can move some can't. Why argue hypotheticals.

[Anonymous No.14760453]

Going suburban to urban made me even poorer desu