Why is /lit/erature filled with foot fetishists

[Anonymous No.14704645]

Why are most writers and readers into feet?

[Anonymous No.14704820]

>>14704645
Because beautiful feet imply gracefulness.

[Anonymous No.14704823]

It's unironically the ultimate fetish of neurotic 140-ish IQ schizoids like me

[Anonymous No.14704844]

>>14704645
The female foot in its corporeal form are one of only two Platonic ideals that manifests in the physical realm; the other is the black hole as an encapsulation of the ideal sphere.

[Anonymous No.14704852]

>>14704844
No fucking way. Einstein was a foot fetishist?

[Anonymous No.14704866]

>>14704645
Footfags have literal brain damage

[Anonymous No.14704883]

>>14704866
So you've never admired a woman's feet?

[Anonymous No.14704904]

>>14704866
This. They should be rounded up and ejected into orbit, far from the hallowed boulevard.

[Anonymous No.14704918]

>oh sorry anon, I fell asleep in this precise position while reading your books! i sure hope you didn't do anything funny to me while I was sleeping haha *queefs and ovulated on your bed*

[Anonymous No.14704931]

>>14704918
fuck you

[Anonymous No.14704940]

>>14704918
>*queefs and ovulated on your bed*
God damn I love when girls do this
I become just so horny that I eat them out on the spot

[Anonymous No.14704960]

>>14704918
*rapes*

[Anonymous No.14705069]

>>14704645
One time I was sucking a toe that had a juicy blister. I nibbled at it a bit when it popped in my mouth I immediately came, it was so embarrassing.

Nothing is more sophisticated than a foot fetish.

[Anonymous No.14705090]

>>14705069
Patrick? You're one of those 4chan incels? What the hell?

[Anonymous No.14705328]

>>14704645
name at least 10

[Anonymous No.14705349]

>>14705328
>Writers
Vonnegut
Tolstoy
Lermontov
Dostoyevsky
Pushkin
>Readers
Gary
Jeff
Jonathan
Berndt
Philip

[Anonymous No.14705358]

>>14705349
I'm Russian and I hear that Tolstoy, Lermontov, Dostoevsky and Pushkin are feet fetishists for the first time.

[Anonymous No.14705365]

>>14705358
Well, you don't expect to be taught that at school, do you?

[Anonymous No.14705399]

>>14705365
Yeah, you have a point... But there is no way I could miss facts like that. If it was true, I would learn it through friends or Internet. I know that Pushkin wrote obscene poems and Tsvetaeva was a lesbian, but TOLSTOY WAS FEET SODOMITE? AND DOSTOEVSKY TOO? You talk nonsense. Do you have any proof?

[Anonymous No.14705406]

>>14705399
Oh, word "sodomite" has different meaning in English, I'm sorry. Feet perverts, that's who they are.

[Anonymous No.14705413]

>>14705399
I've read some info about it in the previous foot fetish discussion thread

[Anonymous No.14705415]

>>14704918
Coomers and trannies go hand in hand. Just fuck off

[Anonymous No.14705427]

>>14705328

Tanizaki
Huysmans (just guessing since he was an armpit fetishist so why not also that)

[Anonymous No.14705561]

>>14704645
What does it say about me if I immediately zoomed in on titties rather than looking at the feet?

[Anonymous No.14705621]

>>14704645

[Anonymous No.14705625]

[Anonymous No.14705648]

>>14705349
>>14705358
I'm Canadian and I hear that Gary, Jeff, Jonathan and Philip are feet fetishists for the first time.

[Anonymous No.14705703]

foot fetishism (i've heard) has to do with a very deep seated disrespect and disdain for women and women's existence in general. the whole erotic attraction, i've heard, is when the man sort of ritualistically resolves this by lowering himself below the woman by fixating upon the lowest and most typically disregarded and "dirty" (touches the dirt) part of her body. it's only because of the deep inequality he feels with women that he has to lower himself like that to get the erotic pleasure

i don't necessarily think foot fetishism is ubiquitous among writers and readers. /lit/ is not a good representation of writers and readers.

however there is a fuckload of disdain for women on /lit/, and also in general among the newer "incel" movements - logical ends of the media filled, isolated, hypersexualized society we live in, that also deprives men of a sense of belonging and ways to feel like integral parts of their community/society. i think this creates so much tension that men then channel a lot of this into sexual interests. because it is ultimately dissociated and one forgets ones pains, albeit very very temporarily

[Anonymous No.14705712]

Most writers are creative types. Homosexuality is more common with creative types. Foot fetishes indicate latent homosexual tendencies.

[Anonymous No.14705754]

>>14704645
Not even a footfag but those are exceptionally cute.

[Anonymous No.14705860]

lewd /tv/ meme

[Anonymous No.14705884]

>>14705399
Don't know about Tolstoy, but as a footfag, I have feetdar, and it's sort of obvious from Dostoevsky's work, and I'm not just talking about The Brother's Karamazov -- there are numerous references to feet in a sexualized context in Dostoevsky's writing. He's pretty much the Tarantino of Russian lit.

[Anonymous No.14705899]

>tfw klossyfeet

[Anonymous No.14707021]

>>14705712
Dude, have you ever seen a man's foot. They're disgusting.
>>14704645
To actually answer your question. It's because women dressed a lot more conservatively back then, No "exposure" of tits or ass like today. Therefore the only thing they could "show off" was their feet. This got men excited.

[Anonymous No.14707304]

>>14704820
Yeah but really it's b/c feet seem "attainable" for men who have mostly lost hope.

[Anonymous No.14707771]

>>14705703
this is horseshit.
armpits, mouth, breasts, vagina, butthole, feet: all of these are areas which exude femininity (literally on a pheromone/aromatic level) and truly high T men will neglect not a single area in their erotic adventures.

[Anonymous No.14707774]

>>14704866
no wonder QT's movies suck so much

[Anonymous No.14707780]

>>14707771
-feet

[Anonymous No.14707795]

>>14707771
>Butthole, armpits
Kys

[Anonymous No.14707868]

>>14704823
based

[Anonymous No.14708472]

the footfag spammer on /lit/ freaks me out because of how active he is, he never really gets very many replies for doing it but that never slows him down. he makes like dozens upon dozens of images committed to his one-man forced meme and despite very little feedback he just keeps going. i can't figure out his endgame.

[Anonymous No.14708511]

>>14708472
I think it's a niche group of footsexuals

[Anonymous No.14708522]

[Anonymous No.14708576]

>>14704645
>>14704844
>>14705349
>>14708522

[Anonymous No.14708614]

>>14704844
Nice new meme work

[Anonymous No.14708675]

>>14708522
rolling

[Anonymous No.14709148]

I'm going to make up a theory as to why foot fetishism exists.

1. There is a metrix of quality of what makes a good foot and a bad foot
2. Feet are essentially like faces in the way that there are ratios to what makes a face 'handsome' or 'beautiful'.
3. The footfag appreciates this beauty-ratio.
4. Feet are very indicative of the person they belong to. You can tell a lazy, unhealthy, or active, or hygenic person by their feet.
5. There is practicality in the foot, a strong foot reflects a person who can handle crisis. A delicate looking foot reflects a delicate person, etc.
6. Their is exhibitionism when it comes to feet as they are typically a sign of vulnerability. A foot rub is considered very intimate except for minimal exceptions.
7. The sheer multitude of the above combines aesthetics, practicality, and fantasy: the fantasy element comes from the stirring of the imagination that stems from the question of whether or not the assumptions based on the foot have merit or not.
8. Give a man a chance to fantasise anything about a woman and a part of her body, he'll make a fetish out of it.
9. Feet are also very sensitive, so one could imagine tickling a girl's feet and her having a reaction (laughter) that is similar to orgasm-face.
10. The foot is a silly thing. It is incredibly functional, but feet have a slight retarded aspect to them, in so far as they are not hands and are not as useful to grab things.

It is the sheer volume of specific but also vague questionings that come from observing and thinking about feet that stirs the imagination, and thus becomes a fetish. There is no one reason, which is what makes non-foot fetishists confused as to why people like feet.

TL;DR: feet are complicated and that makes them sexy to men.

[Anonymous No.14709317]

it truly is absolutely fucking baffling as to how so many goddamn authors are footfags, so many genuinely gifted thinkers are plagued by this shit when its the most vanilla kink a person could possibly have. ive been fucking shafted by a footfag before and by god im going to try and let that shit never happen again. at least based joyce, that lovable irish scamp, had a fucking brap fetish, since he clearly had good taste but even he was a het son of a bitch. where the fuck are all the good classical homophile authors >:(((

[Anonymous No.14709412]

>>14704866
Literal crosswired brains.
>>14704883
Sure, I can see a woman's feet and think they look nice, feminine, well taken care of, but I don't obsess over them or look at and post photos of their feet like a mongoloid.

[Anonymous No.14709538]

>>14705328
Petrarch
Dostoevsky
Tolstoy
Pushkin
Lermontov
Huysmans
Lorrain
Bretonne
Casanova
Tanizaki
Joyce
Mann
Kerouac
Vonnegut

[Anonymous No.14709925]

>>14709538

[Anonymous No.14709955]

[Anonymous No.14709965]

>>14709538

[Anonymous No.14709975]

>>14705358
from Eugene Onegin
>I love its furious delight, The crowd and merriment and light, The ladies, their fantastic dress, Also their feetyet ne'ertheless
Scarcely in Russia can ye find
Three pairs of handsome female feet;
Ah! I still struggle to forget
A pair; though desolate my mind,
Their memory lingers still and seems
To agitate me in my dreams.

[Anonymous No.14710014]

>>14704645

[Anonymous No.14710022]

>>14707021
>Dude, have you ever seen a man's foot. They're disgusting.
wrong. Male feet are in fact more beautiful than female feet (disfigured by high heels).

[Anonymous No.14710655]

>>14709975
I wonder what culture would be the most propitious for footsexuals

[Anonymous No.14710659]

>>14710655
Graeco-Roman

[Anonymous No.14710703]

Bookish men are servile worms who desire and deserve to be trampled underfoot

[Anonymous No.14710726]

>liking feet is about being submissive!!
*blocks your path*

[Anonymous No.14710779]

>>14704645
cuz feets is cute

[Anonymous No.14710912]

[Anonymous No.14710932]

>>14710703

If (USER WAS NOT BANNED FOR THIS POST) then Janny has truly fallen from grace

[Anonymous No.14710970]

>>14709975
In Russian Pushkin talks about legs, not feet. This translation sucks.

[Anonymous No.14710978]

>>14710970
Not what Nabokov says.

[Anonymous No.14711050]

>>14710978
Maybe the word "feet" suits the novel better, I don't know. But there's no "feet" in Russian, only "legs". However, the word "нoгa" (which Pushkin is using throughout his verses) in Russian language can be interpreted both as "leg" and "foot', although it's usually means "leg", as we have the separate word for "foot" ("cтyпня"). So, my though is: if Pushkin really intended to use this word as "foot", he had to put "cтyпня" somewhere in his novel, but I couldn't find it.

[Anonymous No.14711074]

>>14711050
It might be the context

[Anonymous No.14711287]

>>14707021
Yeah footfags are actually delusional. If someone wrote poems about the beauty of a girl's hands or hair, no one would notice. But someone so much as mentions feet, and their coomer tendencies kick in and now they're officially foot fetishists like them. Literally we wuz

[Anonymous No.14711303]

>>14705399
>foot sodomite

[Anonymous No.14711318]

>>14711074
So? What do you mean by "context"? You have only posted the text.

[Anonymous No.14711331]

>>14704918
Now fellas I've seen some degenerate shit, and I can tell with certainty, this sure is degenerate.

[Anonymous No.14711606]

>tfw no footfag gf to step on
>tfw no one else knows this feel

[Anonymous No.14711707]

>>14704645
Valuing feet signals a sophisticated taste in feminine beauty and aesthetics. The female body should not be viewed as consistent of isolated parts as per the usual ass and tits dichotomy. Rather, it should be viewed as a holism of interacting parts the transcends the value of the parts in themselves. Feet play into that interaction and is both strengthened by and strengthens the thighs, hips, waist, chest, shoulders and neck which in totality produces the greatest pleasure of all.

[Anonymous No.14711735]

>>14704645