/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14638815]

>dude humans evolved from this
>it just took billions of years, don’t question it, a lot can happen in a billion years
>evidence? Proof? W-why would you want that? What you believe in god? Lol

Is there anything more pathetic than evolutionists/atheists?

[Anonymous No.14638817]

Not literature

[Anonymous No.14638825]

>>14638815
There are a series of fossils showing changes from one body plan to the next

[Anonymous No.14638829]

>and an eagle named small government perched itself on the flag

[Anonymous No.14638831]

>>14638817
Really... why did this retard wrote a very thick science fiction book about it then

[Anonymous No.14638847]

>dude we already posited hypothetical aeons but it's still not making sense
>Let's just tack on more hypothetical aeons
lmao @ evolutionists

[Anonymous No.14638862]

If evolution is real then who created evolution? Checkmate atheists

[Anonymous No.14638868]

Evolution is the providence of God over millennia and reveals how His plans are executed intricately across time. The Lord inspired this fish to brave land

[Anonymous No.14638875]

>>14638815
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.14638876]

>>14638868
>theistic evolution
Retroactively refuted by Titus Burckhardt.

[Anonymous No.14638884]

>>14638868
>theistic evolution
Materialism in drag is still materialism.

[Anonymous No.14638888]

>>14638876
>he was an eminent member of the “traditionalist” scho-
He’s a guneonfag. Right.

[Anonymous No.14638892]

>>14638884
You literally can’t justify this opinion. How does evolution correspond to materialism? How does creationism correspond to dualism?

[Anonymous No.14638936]

>there’s no evidenc-

[Anonymous No.14638947]

When we look at scientific data we apply uniformitarianism, which is an assumption that the physical laws and processes of the universe have always functioned in the same manner. Note that this is an assumption, as there is no way to demonstrate it for remote periods of time. Prior to the adoption of uniformitarianism, people applied catastrophism, which is the assumption that physical laws have been modified through various catastrophes occurring throughout time.

The view of creation presented in the Bible follows the catastrophic model. At the Fall of Man, when Adam and Eve were evicted from the Garden of Eden, both man and the world were made subject to death, which constitutes a catastrophe on a cosmological scale. There seems to have been a gradual introduction of physical changes, as Genesis records the age of humans gradually decreasing until it reaches the current lifespan, which arrives around the time of the Flood (there is also scriptural evidence of other physical differences from the antediluvian period).

What this means is that humans are cut off from the period prior to the Flood on an epistemological level -- we cannot look at the way the universe functions at the current time and apply it to the past, as the past functioned in a fundamentally different way than the present. If we were to do so, say utilizing scientific dating methodology, it would yield incorrect answers as our underlying assumptions are incorrect. This is the current state of modern science.

[Anonymous No.14638959]

>>14638936
Homology is scientistic astrology.

[Anonymous No.14638966]

>>14638959
>dude this whale has a penis
>humans also have penises so this must mean we have the same ancestor

[Anonymous No.14638972]

>>14638959
How so?

[Anonymous No.14639001]

Nothing really.

[Anonymous No.14639013]

>that one priest who doesn't believe in evolution purely for its conflict with platonic idea of forms
any reading to drink the Platonist "soup"

[Anonymous No.14639044]

>>14638959
Homology woks aginst evolution because it's not really random. And homologous don't really have a viable path, true gradual functional change

[Anonymous No.14639064]

>>14638815
Bruh do you think something won't look different for billion of years ?
There's also lots of debates against god.
Determinism, Which one ?, morality etc.
You think all atheist are the same.

[Anonymous No.14639078]

>>14638815
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent#Cytochrome_c_and_b

[Anonymous No.14639079]

>>14639064
>Bruh do you think something won't look different for billion of years ?
The universe has only existed for around 6,000 years.

[Anonymous No.14639085]

>>14638815
Once you study genomics it becomes impossible to reject evolution.

[Anonymous No.14639097]

>>14639079
>The "universe"
uh huh

[Anonymous No.14639102]

>>14639097
Pretty sure it's really low very low quality bait why do you even bother replying.

[Anonymous No.14639141]

We are an alien species and most living creatures on earth evolved from us