/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14637868]

>start with the greeks
nah fuck that shit start with lil yachty’s mom

[Anonymous No.14638009]

>>14637868
>lil yachty’s mom
>refuted by Guenon, retroactively
Nothing personal, kid.

[Anonymous No.14638036]

>>14638009
Guénon fags are so fucking stupid
Retroactively refuted makes no fucking sense, that's just normal refutation. The word you want would be something like "preemptively", which would imply he refuted them before they produced their work.
Guénonfags can't even fucking use English correctly. Fuck guénonfags it's not even a good meme.

[Anonymous No.14638041]

>>14638036
>t. ass-blasted brainlet materialist made that his fav philosopher was refuted, retroactively

[Anonymous No.14638045]

>>14638041
It's not even about that. I couldn't give two shits about Guénons positions either way. I don't care even if he actually did refute all these philosophers. It's that is a forced, unfunny meme, pushed by someone so ESL that they don't even understand the meaning of "retroactive".

[Anonymous No.14638050]

>>14638045
Language is ephemeral; Metaphysics are eternal.

[Anonymous No.14638071]

>>14638045
>>14638036
btw, you can’t preempt something that you didn’t prepare for; ie btfoing philosophers that you do not know about. Only retroactive makes sense.

[Anonymous No.14638124]

>>14638071
Yes you can. A philosopher’s idea can refute another’s later on, because the first anticipated the second. It doesn’t matter if they know each other. “Retroactively” makes no sense, that’s necessarily the nature of refutation in general.

[Anonymous No.14638148]

guenonites have retroactively refuted perennialism with their inane vacuity