Bertrand Russell was a cuck

[Anonymous No.14574363]

>Russell's marriage to Dora grew increasingly tenuous, and it reached a breaking point over her having two children with an American journalist, Griffin Barry.[133]

[Anonymous No.14574376]

The second child was the breaking point?
Hahahahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.14574492]

> Russell considered himself a liberal, a socialist and a pacifist,

Dora made the right choice

[Anonymous No.14575360]

https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/russelljournal/article/download/2033/2058

It was an open marriage, not cuckoldry
They were stupid commies

[Anonymous No.14575636]

>>14575360
>It was an open marriage, not cuckoldry
People who use the word cuck usually don't distinguish the two

[Anonymous No.14575691]

So was Heidegger:

>Heidegger married Elfride Petri on 21 March 1917,[45] in a Catholic ceremony officiated by his friend Engelbert Krebs [de], and a week later in a Protestant ceremony in the presence of her parents. Their first son, Jörg, was born in 1919.[46]:159 Elfride then gave birth to Hermann [de] in 1920. Heidegger knew that he was not Hermann's biological father but raised him as his son. Hermann's biological father, who became godfather to his son, was family friend and doctor Friedel Caesar.

[Anonymous No.14575713]

>>14575691
I guess he at least got to tap some 17-year old puccy

>Her encounter with Heidegger represented a dramatic departure from the past. He was handsome, a genius, romantic and taught that thinking and "aliveness" were but one.[60] The 17-year-old Arendt then began a long romantic relationship with the 35-year-old Heidegger,[61] who was married with two young sons.

[Anonymous No.14575746]

>>14574363
Analyticals are literal faggots like Witty or cucks like Russell. The söyboys of philosophy basically

[Anonymous No.14575923]

>>14575746
>2020
>Having not yet bridged the philosophical divide by synthesizing the analogical and analytical via process-relational metaphysics.

[Anonymous No.14577002]

>>14575636
>he wasn't a racist, he was just a kkk member
>only very smart people seem to understand this

[Anonymous No.14577022]

>>14575636
that's because there is nothing to distinguish between them

[Anonymous No.14577064]

Dear Russell,
I'm going to quarrel with you again. You simply don't speak the truth, you simply are not sincere. The article you send me is a plausible lie, and I hate it. If it says some true things, that is not the point. The fact is that you, in the essay, are all the time a lie.
Your basic desire is the maximum desire of war, you are really the super-war-spirit. What you want is to jab and strike, like the soldier with the bayonet, only you are sublimated into words. And you are like a soldier who might jab man after man with his bayonet, saying 'this is for ultimate peace'. The soldier would be a liar. And it isn't in the least true that you, your basic self, want ultimate peace. You are satisfying in an indirect, false way your lust to jab and strike. Either satisfy it in a direct and honourable way, saying 'I hate you all, liars and swine, and am out to set upon you', or stick to mathematics, where you can be true. But to come as the angel of peace – no, I prefer Tirpitz a thousand times, in that rôle.
You are simply full of repressed desires, which have become savage and anti-social. And they come out in this sheep's clothing of peace propaganda. As a woman said to me, who had been to one of your meetings: 'It seemed so strange, with his face looking so evil, to be talking about peace and love. He can't have meant what he said.'
I believe in your inherent power for realising the truth. But I don't believe in your will, not for a second. Your will is false and cruel. You are too full of devilish repressions to be anything but lustful and cruel. I would rather have the German soldiers with rapine and cruelty, than you with your words of goodness. It is the falsity I can't bear. I wouldn't care if you were six times a murderer, so long as you said to yourself, 'I am this'. The enemy of all mankind, you are, full of the lust of enmity. It is not the hatred of falsehood which inspires you. It is the hatred of people, of flesh and blood. It is a perverted, mental blood-lust. Why don't you own it.
Let us become strangers again, I think it is better.
D.H. Lawrence

Footnote: Russell later recorded his reaction to this letter: 'I was inclined to believe that [DHL] had some insight denied to me, and when he said that my pacifism was rooted in blood-lust I supposed he must be right. For twenty-four hours I thought that I was not fit to live and contemplated suicide. But at the end of that time, a healthier reaction set in, and I decided to have done with such morbidness' (The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 1968, ii. 22).