/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14416495]

Based reddit

[Anonymous No.14416503]

Why is /lit/ obsessed with cuckoldry? Is it because it is the most leftist board?

[Anonymous No.14416512]

>>14416503

It is definitely not the most leftist board

NIGGER

[Anonymous No.14416524]

not /lit/

[Anonymous No.14416526]

>>14416495
dude how is exploitation even real like just open your own business lmao
like just be self-employed hahaha

[Anonymous No.14416541]

>>14416526
This, but unironically.

[Anonymous No.14416549]

unsubtle self advertisement

[Anonymous No.14416567]

>>14416495
>hey look at me! i'm refuting my own attack on capitalism by even mentioning the possibility of there being employers to begin with!
in communism no one can be a boss at all, and everyone is cucked by the state. all labor is taken and distributed by the state. so, capitalism has the splendid option of not being cucked at all and thereby is less cucked than communism.
communism is a wife who cucks you but you can't even divorce her.

[Anonymous No.14416623]

>>14416567
There is no state in communism, what are you on about.

[Anonymous No.14416659]

>>14416567
>t. wagie

[Anonymous No.14416684]

>>14416623
Ah you must be an anarcho-communist, what does it feel to know you are one the few ideologies more retarded than communism?

[Anonymous No.14416697]

Imagine there's people who are cucked to the degree of that post and all they do is whine about how it's bad. Why not just use it to cuck others?

[Anonymous No.14416727]

>>14416495
capitalism is risk vs reward. bet on yourself to start your own business or risk nothing and be a cuck.

[Anonymous No.14416735]

Imagine calling another man your “boss” when you yourself are a grown man LMAOOOOOOOOO

I literally showed up late to work nonstop when I was a wagecuck, I absolutely would not show up “early” or even on time to make my “boss” seem impressed by me. God you are a pathetic cuck if you spend the majority of your waking hours trying to impress your “boss”. Pathetic as fuck.

[Anonymous No.14416752]

>>14416735
Uhhhh. Hello? Based Club.

[Anonymous No.14416761]

>>14416684
>He thinks anarchism is an ideology and not an enlightened state of consciousness.
How does it feel to not be able to even imagine freedom because it isn't even within the domain of your experience?

[Anonymous No.14416767]

>My boss said I could get a 2% raise next year and that I could have Christmas Eve off this year!

[Anonymous No.14416773]

>>14416735
Based.
>never volunteer for extra hours unless it’s paid
>always demand raises and promotions, even lying about having a gf or wife and baby to justify the raise/promotion
>shitting on company time lmao
> get fired, shit on the jew’s office in the way out

[Anonymous No.14416777]

>>14416727
>capitalism is risk vs reward.
Indeed it is: the capitalist risks the labor of others, and takes all the rewards for himself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability
Now if we had a situation where a capitalist's life and family were all executed if they were fail, THAT would be real risk, not wagering other people's work.

[Anonymous No.14416785]

Work for most is inherently cucked, doesnt matter why or who you are doing it, you are using waking hours doing something you probably dont care that much about. Thinking everyone will be doing their le dream job in le ebic socialist society is a pipe dream. Your just cucked to society at that point.

[Anonymous No.14416790]

>>14416727
How can you even argue this post Great Recession with all the bailouts? The era of "too big to fail?" Are you really this stupid?

[Anonymous No.14416824]

>Can I pretty please have next Friday off? My wife is having major surgery and she needs me there to take care of her? Can I please take time away from my office being a spreadsheet monkey to take care of my loved one, master?
>I CAN?!?!? WOW, you’re the greatest “BOSS” ever, SIR!

[Anonymous No.14416831]

>>14416495
Everyone can't be a winner. At best you can try to make everyone miserable with communism. But even then some people will be healthier, more attractive... and the people at the bottom will resent them.
It's not fair, it just is that way.

Maybe one day reddit commies will understand this simple concept.

[Anonymous No.14416833]

>>14416623
>there is no state in communism

[Anonymous No.14416834]

>>14416567
>>14416684
You're right but you're using the wrong terminology. Communism by definition gets rid of the state, there's no need to add "anarcho" to it. Socialism is the ideology where the state cucks you.

>>14416735
Unless you were doing something productive with that time, which I highly doubt, you're just a lazy and pathetic human being. You're not protesting against the system, you're protesting against your own self-decency.

[Anonymous No.14416836]

>>14416541
>>14416526
There's a difference between being self-employed and owning a business. Typically self-employed (esp atm) is even worse than normal waging/being a salaryman.

[Anonymous No.14416845]

>>14416567
>in communism no one can be a boss at all
That's not true. Labour can still be managed, but there isn't rent collection shit going on.

[Anonymous No.14416846]

>>14416834
I’m sleeping and keeping myself healthy you cocksucker. I will NEVER sacrifice my own health and well-being for the sake of some company that would replace me in an INSTANT with some pajeetnigger if it were possible. Fuck work, fuck “hard workers”, and fuck you.

[Anonymous No.14417048]

>>14416834
You really need to throw away the Marxist influences on you and realize that anarchism is right now, not some hypothetical future. Also "doing something productive" is a liberal canard.

[Anonymous No.14417060]

>>14417048
To explain, "doing something productive" always means "do something FOR ME." Non-productivity is anarchism.

[Anonymous No.14417879]

>>14416790
government bailouts aren't capitalism retard

[Anonymous No.14417893]

>>14416777
who started the business? who bought the tools? who bought the land? who sunk their own money into it? not the employee. risk your own initial investment or cuck for someone else that did.

[Anonymous No.14417917]

>>14416623
you're cute, anon! i like the way you say dumb fucking retarded shit that makes absolutely no god damned sense, what's your number! let's go on a date, you unironic retard!

[Anonymous No.14417979]

>>14416495
Since there's no natural selection anymore, most people are literally retarded. Being a wagecuck working their ass off and barely surviving due to retarded decisions earlier in life is the best option for everyone.
If you're not retarded, you can start with wagecucking, just save money, keep asking for a raise and don't put anymore effort than the bare minimum. Change jobs. When you got the money, finish some course/school after which you'll easily get a high-paying job. Don't get married. Don't move out of your parents' house. Work for a year, neet for a year, or however you like.
The only problem is, you'll run out of room for books, if you're hardcore /lit/.

[Anonymous No.14418004]

>>14417879
then capitalism is untenable because bailouts are necessary to prevent a total societal collapse

[Anonymous No.14418408]

>>14417879
all ideologues are the fucking same, they all have the same coping mechanisms
>government bailouts aren't capitalism retard
how many times has a socialist gave you the same answer(''it's not real socialism'') when talking about the results of ''socialism in action''?
also you're full of shit the bougie state played and still plays a significant role in the enforcement of capitalism you ideologue fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.14418466]

neither commie or capitalismus is a solution, as they are expressions of the same problem

[Anonymous No.14418472]

>>14416503
> it is the most leftist board
someone hasn't been to >>>/mu/

[Anonymous No.14418499]

I mean, if he's comapring modes of production, in feudalism Lords literally did cuck their 'employees' all the time with Primae Nochtis. It was an established right. Still generally agree with op's image tho

[Anonymous No.14418503]

>>14417979
there's maybe four people on this board who qualify as hardcore /lit/

[Anonymous No.14418583]

>>14416735
Yeah, but you'll never get promoted in your life. Enjoy your entry level job...

[Anonymous No.14418608]

There's only one form of government that truly serves the people. An ideology so dangerous to the status quo that it had to be bombed to smithereens, occupied, pulled apart and demonized for generations.

[Anonymous No.14418641]

>>14418583
Not true, you can just get a new job at a different company for a huge pay raise

[Anonymous No.14418654]

>>14416541
travel anywhere

[Anonymous No.14418696]

Stale 2016 energy

[Anonymous No.14418722]

>>14416495
okay, i give this a based

[Anonymous No.14418727]

>>14418472
nah /mu/ just likes black people, /lit/ is genuinely leftist

[Anonymous No.14418729]

>>14418608
theocratic distributism.

[Anonymous No.14418767]

>>14416495
>If you ever make a concession for whatever reason, you are a cuck
I also think capitalism is terrible, but this is taking it too far.

[Anonymous No.14418865]

>>14417879
>Real capitalism has never been tried.
>>14416831
>He thinks all of reality is a zero-sum game, projecting his psychological dysfunction onto the rest of the world.
>who started the business? who bought the tools? who bought the land? who sunk their own money into it? not the employee. risk your own initial investment or cuck for someone else that did.
A whole network of humans through time and in the present who facilitated such means. But you don't want to talk about where the capitalist got their money in the first place, because you're an economic creationist who worships the holy "Job Creator" who somehow creates value ex nihilo without anyone else involved.

[Anonymous No.14418869]

>>14418727
>/lit/ is genuinely leftist
This is what neo-Nazi authoritarians actually believe.

[Anonymous No.14418926]

>>14416495
the only way not to get cucked by the state is to be the state

[Anonymous No.14419023]

>>14418926
Or to abolish it completely

[Anonymous No.14419051]

>>14419023
doesn't work like that monkey brain, get back in the cage

[Anonymous No.14419054]

>>14416503
I think /co/ or /gif/ is more obsessed with homosexuality and black cock than /lit/

[Anonymous No.14419065]

This is old pasta originally about having a daughter...

[Anonymous No.14419119]

>>14416526
The system is built around fucking you over if you do that. I still do it fairly successfully though because I strike a balance between self-employed and owned business in the way >>14416836 outlines. But it's still pretty bad. Small businesses are just dangerous. Some corporate vampire can kill your livelihood on a whim (political influence). Unironically I wish the nonsense fantasy that you cuckniggers tout 'capitalism' were real, it would be easy to economically dominate others because businessmen are mouthbreathing retards, they just have power and wealth and connections and no morals (probably the most important). the guys who try to get into it and largely fail only succeed a tiny little bit by shameless behaviour amounting in betraying a friend or partner. they're just dumb. throwing shit at a wall and it never sticks so they gotta get someone else to do it. the one's born into it are largely dumb too but that's a given for richfags even with good education and cultured sensibilities.

furthermore, the modern man is subhuman so markets, and entire shallow identities that people damn near kill over, are easy to force into existence in today's world (because they live flicking through these identities like a magazine). the real 'capitalism' is nothing like muh free market muh competition muh initiative. In practice those words actually mean 'you need to suck Mr braindead status quo's dick' or 'you need to hand over your economic and political rights so we can turn your people into degenerate slobs for profit and steal your resources'.

[Anonymous No.14419166]

>>14416495
People who are smarter than you should be your boss. This is fair and just.

>B-but I want a society where nobody is boss.
Grow the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.14419185]

>>14418499
Never happened, romantic invention

[Anonymous No.14419203]

>>14416495
Absolutely BASED

[Anonymous No.14419243]

>>14419166
How old are you? The people in charge are rarely the smartest people in the firm.

[Anonymous No.14419344]

>>14419243
But they're still smarter on average.

[Anonymous No.14419351]

>>14419344
they're in charge because the state pays the police to protect them from grug

[Anonymous No.14419357]

>>14419351
And that's a good thing. Grug doesn't want anarchy either, that's why he's supports the state.

[Anonymous No.14419367]

>>14419357
no, grug wants to smash you and take your rocks, he doesn't because the state will give him rocks if he will stand by to smash others

[Anonymous No.14419396]

>>14419344
>still smarter on average
Screencap your post and read it when you enter the working world

[Anonymous No.14419409]

>>14418729
Based Chestertonposter

[Anonymous No.14419437]

>>14419396
Do you honestly believe that people who stack boxes in a warehouse are just as smart as managers/CEOs on average?

[Anonymous No.14419447]

>>14416495
Not worthy of the original

[Anonymous No.14419474]

>>14418466
Source?

[Anonymous No.14419487]

>>14419437
"on average" is up there with "per capita" in terms of midwit red flags

[Anonymous No.14419584]

>>14416495
It's so weird the way communists frame everything as exploitation. They don't differentiate between entrepreneurship and the precarious risk taking that creates jobs and industries, vs. rent seeking, monopolies, parasites, and so on. Everything is just bad to them if the employee does not own the means of production and the fruits of their labour. Not one complaint in this Reddit diatribe about government taxing workers, either. There are many tax systems that could exist which would not tax worker income, yet it's somehow fine for government to garnish your privately earned salary because it's ostensibly for the public good.

Incidentally, "cuck" was effective against certain conservatives because being a cuckold had resonance with the sort of bait-and-switch betrayal conservative politicians routinely do... pretending to be traditional, religious or nationalist while actially selling out the country's native population and using immigration to drive down wages and divide and conquer the society.

The cuck metaphor seems much more forced for communist views of how business works, because you have to agree with the premise. Everyone knows conservative politicians who suck corporate cock in plain sight. No one but communists see things the way the Redditor hamfistedly lays down, and if you need to explain your "witty" jokes and insults at such length, maybe there's a reason the meme didn't start among communists to begin with.

[Anonymous No.14419634]

>>14419474
Kaczynski

[Anonymous No.14419678]

>>14419584
>risk taking
there is no risk in socialism/communism, a state-owned company producing water doesn't risk anything because 1) it's chief aim is the greatest social welfare, not the maximization of profits and 2) people will always have to drink water so there is no risk involved. Risk exists only in capitalism where a given sector of production is divided between competing firms. Of course central planners guide the whole system so that there is no misallocation of resources.
>rent seeking
Socialism takes the framework of the toiler. From his perspective, there is effectively little difference between risk premium and rent seeking.
> Everything is just bad to them if the employee does not own the means of production and the fruits of their labour
have you even read anything written by an ACTUAL socialist and NOT by a reddit Chapofag? Because if you had, you would have known that socialism doesn't do away with surplus value since surplus value allows for accumulation of capital and social investments. The difference is that unlike in capitalism those investments are not motivated by profit and this fraction of accumulated surplus value which constitutes conspicuous consumption of luxuries by capitalists is instead given out to the people as social dividend. Read Lange.

[Anonymous No.14419713]

>>14419678
your new home is a woodchipper, climb in

[Anonymous No.14419876]

>>14419678
>there is no risk in socialism/communism
Yes there is. In capitalist economies, entrepreneurs create businesses and take on most of the risk, but receive most of the reward. Workers take on significantly less risk than such an entrepreneur, but have a more secure lifestyle. In a socialist/communist society, the state/society takes on all the risk. This doesn't mean there is -no- risk. It actually means that the risk is shared more equally, via the failure of state-owned companies or initiatives that were poorly conceived or implemented by central planners. Mao's China in particular has some hilarious examples of this, and so do other centrally planned economies.

Most of the rest of your post is stunningly predictable and not worth replying to. God forbid you ever have a discussion without - whenever some critique comes your way - accusing your opponent of not reading enough or going full "no true scotsman" to obfuscate the repeated failure of your ideas. Read George.

[Anonymous No.14419888]

>leftoids appropriate a meme again

This time it was actually decent but god damn