[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 117 KB, 1280x720, serveimage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14376897 No.14376897 [Reply] [Original]

*proceeds to be correct about literally everything*

>> No.14376968

But I thought /lit/ worshipped Hegel.

>> No.14376971

Vivekananda philosophically destroyed him

>> No.14376979

>>14376971
Would you argue he retroactively refuted him?

>> No.14376998

>>14376897
well now he's probably burning in hell so was it worth it

>> No.14376999

>>14376968
Schopenhauer is extremely easy to read, requires only the most bare-bones cursory (mis)understanding of Kant, writes in a way that is actually enjoyable instead of painful, and echoes every single ingrained defeatist loser belief that boardposters harbor in a manner that is, on the surface of it, more respectable than the linkin park lyrics where they are also found, since it is written in a philosophy book, which means that someone who quotes Schopenhauer won't be called out as a faggot as quickly as someone quoting linkin park, even though the two things are essentially the same.

One the other hand, Hegel is difficult, requires you apply yourself, and requires you to be erudite in Kantian philosophy and post-Kantian idealism and romanticism.

Of course /lit/fags are Schopenhauerians.

>> No.14377006

>>14376897
*proceeds to be incorrect about literally everything except women**

>> No.14377024
File: 1.42 MB, 1648x1664, e55d5e54ae2e3f97c81a91214ea993b6d72d363fc89d8e162a6caa09c1b5f77b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14377024

>>14376999
>404: Argument not found

>> No.14377025

>>14376897
Has he been proven thoroughly correct about women consdering the current threands?

>> No.14377028

>>14377006
This.

>> No.14377046

>>14376999
H*gel is the most lukewarm and unchallenging "thinker" ever to rise to fame, even more vapid than Oscar Wilde aphorisms. His ""complicated"" concepts are just literary experiments that do not question anything nor offer anything new, he is bourgeois narrow-mindedness incarnate, the herald of the status-quo of hierarchies presenting himself as the holder of Objective Truth.
On the other hand, Schopenhauer keeps things subjective, and his passion only demonstrates his high esteem of mankind. He isn't right about much but certainly is a higher grade of human than H*gel

>> No.14377057

>>14376897
Well he wasn't correct with his interpretation of Hegel for a start

>> No.14377058

>>14376999
Hegel was quoted in a fucking video game and had many many loyal followers. You're overestimating how hard it is to get into Hegel.

>> No.14377063

>>14376999
based

>> No.14377065

>>14377046
Objective is the subjective

>> No.14377074

>>14376999
Hegel is difficult because he fills you with vague uncertainties that don't really mean anything.

>> No.14377082

>>14377046
Based fencesitting idiot

>> No.14377086

>>14376897
He absolutely wasn't right about everything, but he was so aesthetic you have to respect him.

>> No.14377092

i non ironically recommend Schopenhauer to incels.

old shoppy is the curl up and die and hates women philospher

>> No.14377106

>>14377092
If I saw people give that pseud Hegel attention, I'd be the same way as Schopenhauer.

>> No.14377111

>>14377046
>>14377058
>>14377074

This is the kind of shitty undergrad posturing I come to /lit/ for.

>> No.14377119

>>14377111
Go jerk off in the academia clique.

>> No.14377202
File: 445 KB, 1314x1894, retroactive.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14377202

>>14376897
Schopenhauer gets very close to the school of thought that's actually right about literally everything (Advaita Vedanta), but he doesn't quite fully make it

>> No.14377238

>>14376968
Wtf are you talking about? If anything Hegel is largely seen as some space-time occult sourcerer mixed with a grandfather of things people actually like.

>>14377111
I don’t disagree.

>> No.14377283

>>14377202
>according to him a concept is but passive
Dropped

>> No.14377286
File: 310 KB, 1642x2560, 1574018071249.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14377286

>>14377092
More like the

>pursue art, contemplation, compassion, and religious practices (and hates women)

philosopher. Have you actually read him?

>> No.14377409

>>14376897
he really wasnt. his metaphysics is full of holes

>> No.14377790

Max Stirner destroyed Hegel. And what about that mounteback Hegelian Francis Fukuyama's end of history? It's a bankrupt system you faggots.

>> No.14377929

>>14377024
Off topic but what's this artist's name. I've seen their art (or at least similar looking art) a lot but could never find a name

>> No.14378560

>>14377929
https://booru.io/q/kogecha_(coge_ch)%23artist

>> No.14378590

>>14377046
>Schopenhauer keeps things subjective
You're a complete idiot. Schopenhauer is a monist and ties that to the will-in-itself.