[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 74 KB, 750x669, 1574870263433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14276101 No.14276101 [Reply] [Original]

where do you go after Plato?

>> No.14276118

>>14276101
back to >>>/r/eddit

>> No.14276153

>>14276101
dumb image. 130 is still midwit range

>> No.14276171

>>14276101
This image was made by a midwit.

>> No.14276728

>>14276153
>>14276171
midwit ends at 140

160 is mozart

>> No.14276754

>>14276101
20iq Descartes
50iq Heidegger
50iq Lacan
70iq Plato
100iq Kant
120iq Spinoza
140iq Hegel
160iq Marx
180iq Deleuze
200iq Whitehead

>> No.14276760

>>14276101
Plotinus or Shankara

>> No.14276777

>>14276101
Aristoteles

>> No.14276793

>>14276101
Plato

>> No.14276813

>>14276101
Marx -20 iq

>> No.14277583
File: 606 KB, 680x438, B7C0C60B-7B1E-4859-A217-81BFF4FAE861.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14277583

>>14276101
>owen benjamin
>vox day

>> No.14277614

>>14276754
20iq Deleuze
50iq Marx
50iq Hegel
70iq Lacan
100iq Descartes
120iq Plato
140iq Whitehead
160iq Heidegger
180iq Spinoza
200iq Kant

>> No.14277688

>>14276760
this

>> No.14278072

>>14276760
Are these guys hard or easy?

>> No.14278094

>>14278072

as difficult as you can get in philosophy. trying to understand plotinus can feel like taking a nuke to the brainstem

>> No.14278105

>>14278094
I think that's when he is untranslated though when translated he's medium difficulty at most

>> No.14278620
File: 52 KB, 500x514, 6248446+_7e656b56952a9a73dff80c024c4bf745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14278620

>>14276813
Underrated

>> No.14278768

>>14277614
Kant dumb

>> No.14278808

>>14276101
>styx
>145

Have you read his fiction book 'sickness in hell'? Guy can't even write basic English.

>> No.14279063

>>14276101
the only answer is aristotle

>> No.14279084

>>14276101
is this going by actual IQ of the individuals or IQ of the viewers? because if it's the latter jbp is 135

>> No.14279120

Nassim Taleb's IQ is estimated to be around 210.

>> No.14279148

>>14279120
>People unironically believe this

If you're not producing groundbreaking research in Maths or Physics then you can't claim an IQ of higher than 150 (Which is still probably top 0.001%)

>> No.14279349
File: 39 KB, 250x253, 1571324243185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14279349

>>14279148
>If you're not producing groundbreaking research in Metaphysics then you can't claim an IQ of higher than 180

>> No.14279352

>>14276101
HELL

>> No.14279369

>>14279148
Taleb actually did make a groundbreaking work in financial mathematics on options theory. He's good

>> No.14279406

>>14276101
personally i just like to crack a beer, take a key bump or 5, and watch some infowars in my basement totally naked and coated in sweat

>> No.14279420

>>14278105
I wouldn't even attempt Plotinus without at least a surface understanding of Aristotle. Without any conception of how he employs matter and form, potentiality and actuality, and unity and multiplicity it's going to be a rough ride when you get to the latter enneads concerning the nature of the higher hypostases

>> No.14279422

>>14276118
/thread

>> No.14279433

>>14279369
>google his name and financial mathematics research
>no results show research in a journal which others have cited
>first post is a guy talking about how Taleb is a clown

Yes, why does this not surprise me.

>> No.14279463

i'm surpised /lit isn't horrified at the image of Jordan Peterson at the 165+ category. I personally like him, but I know that's not a popular opinion here.

>> No.14279464

>>14276101
Whine-igger

>> No.14279485
File: 132 KB, 1000x800, ideas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14279485

>>14279148
cringe & yikes

>> No.14279525

>>14276793
this
skip all other philosophers and reread Plato instead so to save time

>> No.14279600

>>14276101
There's no "after Plato." Every other author is just misinterpreting or reiterating Plato's ideas.

>> No.14279830

>>14276728
That's not how IQ works. Midwit ends at 145.

>> No.14279837

>>14279148
>IQ of higher than 150 (Which is still probably top 0.001%)
gave me a kek

>> No.14279852

>>14276754
9000iq Guenon

>> No.14280586
File: 192 KB, 600x1046, fbdfa6bbb003cf7f7278a39067057df7-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14280586

>>14278105
Understanding Plotinus view on matter takes at least three reads.
>evil does not exist (lacks ontological existence)
>matter is the image of the indefinites of the Dyad, but only that aspect
>therefore matter is without quality, formless
>but matter can be said to be one
>but not the One itself (OR IS IT?)
>he wants to say that there's a difference between intelligible matter and worldly matter
>but you can't prove this since the only real difference between them is that heavenly matter is enformed by God himself, and bodily matter is enformed by the image of the image of God. But since matter is from the beginning without quality, you can't truly say they're different.
>All definitions of the One can be applied to Matter.
>Except the claim that all things come from the One, but nothing comes from matter.
Matter is the end of generation, therefore necessarily empty, it is nonbeing, yet even it like every, is still a oneness.
The Neoplatonists I believe were afraid, even Damascius (who almost say it), to take the leap of faith that Matter is what the Ineffable is after the divine Subjects twists their vision of the One. It is the veil of knowledge itself, the abyss of the One.

And that's wirhout going into evil and the soul and matter.

>> No.14280789

>>14276754
>>14279852
These but unironically