/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14197385]

Has there been a serious response or fact check of this book?

[Anonymous No.14197531]

>>14197385
No, and there will never be one. And there is a reason for that. Same thing goes for The Bell Curve. Its just your standard name calling and accusations of racism and antisemitism. No actual rebuttal outside of MUH FEELINGS MUH SENSIBILITIES and so on.

[Anonymous No.14197539]

>>14197531
>"the joooo's"
Yea fuck the kikes.

[Anonymous No.14197715]

>>14197385
If you seriously engage with something you admit that the work has some sort of legitimate perspective. It is much easier to just ban it and ignore any attempts at discussion.

[Anonymous No.14197724]

Are we posting books nobody has refuted?

[Anonymous No.14197749]

>>14197385
No just a bunch of baseless moralizing condemnation by the status quo.

[Anonymous No.14197809]

>>14197385
http://nathancofnas.com/debate-with-kevin-macdonald/
i have huge respect for cofnas for taking it this far; i hope taking macdonald seriously doesn't fuck with his career

[Anonymous No.14197846]

There have been quite a few, but being written by Jews, we can safely ignore them

[Anonymous No.14197855]

>>14197846
Hi Rabbi

[Anonymous No.14197992]

Is there anything to this book other than "Yids = bad"? Any interesting sociological insights? I have better things to do than read about how Adam Sandler profited off of WWII

[Anonymous No.14198023]

>>14197992
KMac advances the thesis that Jewish behavior is an evolutionary strategy, to ensure the coherence and survival of their own group (as a permanent minority without a homeland) by weakening and subverting their hosts. The strategy is self reinforcing because it provokes extreme negative reactions when their actions are fully uncovered, thus further incentivizing Jews to behave in deceitful and subversive ways.

[Anonymous No.14198077]

>>14198023
They really fucked up with that easily identifiable costume and hairstyle.

[Anonymous No.14198091]

>>14198023
>evolutionary strategy
that's why everyone except the hasids are basically sterile, sure

[Anonymous No.14198132]

>>14198077
it's not the orthodox ones he's talking about. people can "see" them, so their alien ideas do not gain traction.
it's the (((fellow whites))) who are the danger (which is why so many nations have forced them to identify themselves or outright banished them over the past 3000 years)
CoC meticulously catalogs their actions in subverting western civilization over the 20th century

[Anonymous No.14198154]

I actually started reading this book and it's absolutely enraging, and I haven't even got past the introduction. I can see why Jews want it banned.

[Anonymous No.14198166]

I'm Jewish, should I read this book? I'm not part of the Jewish elite and have no power, so I'm not really worried about being offended.

[Anonymous No.14198189]

>>14198023
>KMac advances the thesis that Jewish behavior is an evolutionary strateg
Isn't this true for every ethnic group. Why just limit it to the Jews?
> The strategy is self reinforcing because it provokes extreme negative reactions when their actions are fully uncovered, thus further incentivizing Jews to behave in deceitful and subversive ways.
This is a verbose way of saying Jews care for their own interests as opposed to the state, which is a larger scale consequence of capitalism that makes us all narcissistic.

It seems he took generic ideas about race and class, then strictly applied them to the Jews and made whites naive but virtuous. How is this any different than a SJW's criticism of whites?

[Anonymous No.14198200]

>>14198166
Read these

[Anonymous No.14198219]

>>14198200
E. Michael Jones is a religious nut, I'm not reading him, I have a copy of Mein Kampf, but Knasgaurd said it's worthless aside from the fact hitler wrote it plus there's other things worth reading IMO, IDC about Israel so the Israel lobby doesn't interest me, if he argues it shouldn't exist well then that's fine, but it won't change anything and I'm really indifferent if it does or does not desu, I find it funny you have those books then the Landmark Herodotus and Sun Tzu right next to it kek.

[Anonymous No.14198222]

>>14198189
I respect your sincerity but you don't seem to be a thinker.

[Anonymous No.14198227]

>>14198189
He focuses on Jews because they're at the forefront of every single campaign to subvert the ethnic interests of European descendants in the most hypocritical ways possible. The Jews can have their interests but we can't even point out that the Jews have ethnic interests. Peoples careers have been ruined for doing just that. If Muslims were as successful at destroying western civilization as the Jews then books would be written about them instead.

[Anonymous No.14198229]

>>14198166
Based
What do you do for a living based Jew anon?

[Anonymous No.14198241]

>>14198227
>He focuses on Jews because they're at the forefront of every single campaign to subvert the ethnic interests of European descendants in the most hypocritical ways possible.
This obvious, but so are niggers and Indians, Jews are just more effective in doing so. The only repercussion is a provincial Jew far removed from power or a hasidic Jew gets targeted while the elites sit back unscathed. Thucydides had a similar analysis in Pelopennsian war too about the Spartans and the origin of Hellenic people, so IDK why this is exclusive to Jews again.

> The Jews can have their interests but we can't even point out that the Jews have ethnic interests. Peoples careers have been ruined for doing just that
I agree with this.

> If Muslims were as successful at destroying western civilization as the Jews then books would be written about them instead.
fair enough

>>14198222
Ok, why not?

[Anonymous No.14198249]

>>14198229
I'm going to Mortuary school to be a mortician.

[Anonymous No.14198251]

>>14198023
>KMac
When will they collab?
https://youtu.be/mvTiBWfcNQs

[Anonymous No.14198313]

>>14198132
I feel sorry for the person who spent time mining twitter to create this image

[Anonymous No.14198317]

>>14198222
Very good description of him

[Anonymous No.14198348]

>>14198313

[Anonymous No.14198351]

>>14198249
Double based
Have you watched Six Feet Under by any chance?
What is mortuary school like? F-Fun?

[Anonymous No.14198355]

>>14198313
>>14198348
lol

[Anonymous No.14198371]

>>14197385
>>14197531
>>14197749
>>14197846
>>14198023
>>14198132
>>14198154
>>14198227
No one who is "legitimate" will even touch it, and that Cofnas guy's attack was fucking stupid and only made MacDonald look even better in the eyes of his sycophants

However, based Ryan Faulk has kind of shown that a lot of the premise on which CoC is built is kind of total horseshit when you actually look at the statistical evidence.
I'm entirely aware of jewish power, most normies would consider me to be a vile anti-semite if I were to give my full opinion on jews, but it does seem like MacDonald is motivated by a crude biolocial anti-semitism (certainly most of his followers are) which is why he doesn't really substantiate his claims

A handful of anecdotes about certain jews in academia is not enough for me to condemn a group of 15 million people

http://thealternativehypothesis.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/PDF-FOR-RYAN.pdf

[Anonymous No.14198372]

>>14198351
>What is mortuary school like? F-Fun?
Well stupid me got a STEM degree first and said fuck this bureaucracy upon graduation, so I don't start until the Spring, but I think I don't have to go as long because I already have a degree.

> Have you watched Six Feet Under by any chance?
No, is it good. I'm watching The Larry Sanders Show at the moment and don't like it, so I could use a new show to watch.

[Anonymous No.14198606]

>>14198372
It's a drama about a bunch of people growing up with a morgue downstairs in their house because it's a family run funeral home. Each episodes begins with a cold open featuring a death of a person that gets brought into the funeral home and then the episodes unfold from that. Great show

[Anonymous No.14198615]

>>14198371
>A handful of anecdotes about certain jews in academia is not enough for me to condemn a group of 15 million people
Too bad you don't make the rules, chap.

[Anonymous No.14198630]

>>14198606
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFgi8eCfWNo

this show is very lit

[Anonymous No.14198905]

>>14198615
I suppose, just my two cents

[Anonymous No.14199198]

>>14198371
>statistical evidence
>come into my liar little ones!
what statistical evidence you fucking retard? you can't use that as an argument and not expect to get shot in the fucking head, it's a lie if you don't show the 'evidence' and explain its method

also notice
>most normies would consider
you're stuck in a loop of compulsive behavior constantly explaining your apology to the brainless masses who don't even understand what you're saying in the first place

basically you're mentally retarded because your train of thought is constantly interrupted by spasms of fear.
you have no concept of racial identity.
here's the thing little bitch: the race adheres to the social contract, everyone in the race follows it and those who can follow it best rise to the top of the hierarchy

they are all criminals. it's bred into them. its a condition of their survival in the race. anyone who couldn't follow along was kicked out and/or died

[Anonymous No.14199208]

>>14199198
lair*

also ryan faulk is a retarded emotionally spastic idiot - his main motivation is consoling himself of his racial inferiority

[Anonymous No.14199740]

>>14198154

[Anonymous No.14199832]

>>14197385
I mean, the bibliography alone is 50 pages iirc

[Anonymous No.14200095]

>>14199740

It concludes that Jews are more successful because of in-group preference and above average verbal intelligence.
Those are the same two reasons Jews normally give the goyim to explain it themselves..

[Anonymous No.14200236]

>>14198371
subtle pilpul

there are no people who hold this world view.

[Anonymous No.14200258]

>>14200095
Are you sure? Don't they claim Jewish innate genius, hard work and being chosen by God?

This seems like subtle pilpul too. Interesting.

[Anonymous No.14201423]

>>14200095
what does verbal intelligence even mean?
objectify.

multiferous connections between words and languages in the brain?
that they definitely have. they are always playing word games - making jokes, lies, really striving to turns words every which way for any reason they can find

[Anonymous No.14201449]

>>14197385
yes, reality. all you need to do is read the atrocities europeans have committed throughout their raise to dominance to completely disregard it

>jews are x y z therefore they're a and any positive doesn't count but [insert lies/excuse]
>when do x y z but it doesn't count and i'm not a i'm a special good boy good guy who dindu nuffin look at the positive i did which counts extra super duper

[Anonymous No.14201455]

>>14198371
I pretty much agree.

[Anonymous No.14201598]

>>14201449
>atrocity
>I'll just moralize everything I don't like and evil then I always win in my little world of delusion
we're going to kill you all

[Anonymous No.14201787]

>>14198189
The difference lies in jews being entrenched in a subversive foreigner approach.
The host nation is having its own thing, and are getting subverted from outside groups.
It is not the general manner in which people act in their ethnic interests, which focuses on public recognition and land ownership. Coerced separation within their ranks is also the o l'y manner not to be diluted into the hist nation, so yids have developed very intense communal tendencies. As noted earlier, it is 'evolutionary', because for any yids that didn't show these tendencies, it was much easier to break with jews and join the goyim than changing the mind of a group that was increasingly defined by its separation.
The remark about whites and sjws is really beyond the point. No (other) white ethnic group has acted in this subversive manner anywhere. They were either chill or conquerors, which is an entirely different strategy. The closest might be Greeks in the ottoman empire and that's a very distant analogy at best. It's also a comical comparison considering the ethnic masochism of contemporary whitey. But more fundamentally, non-Jewish white groups have all quite high degree of individualism, especially in the long run outside of localised temporary ethnic conflicts, making such a strategy most unlikely.

[Anonymous No.14201802]

>>14201449
>t. Didn't even pretend to know what book is about.
Yes, book is all about muh jooooos. Retarded antisemite, amaright ? Think of da colonialism.

[Anonymous No.14201945]

>>14201423
in the case of the jew, it is talmudic sophistry

[Anonymous No.14201947]

>>14201945
otherwise known as
>pilpul

[Anonymous No.14201955]

>>14201787
>The difference lies in jews being entrenched in a subversive foreigner approach
Any minority group this could be said for.

> The remark about whites and sjws is really beyond the point. No (other) white ethnic group has acted in this subversive manner anywhere. They were either chill or conquerors, which is an entirely different strategy. The closest might be Greeks in the ottoman empire and that's a very distant analogy at best. It's also a comical comparison considering the ethnic masochism of contemporary whitey. But more fundamentally, non-Jewish white groups have all quite high degree of individualism, especially in the long run outside of localised temporary ethnic conflicts, making such a strategy most unlik
Immediately I thought of the Ottoman Empire, but we both know you’re wrong here and coping anon

[Anonymous No.14202201]

>>14201955
other minority groups in european societies are always obvious outsiders due to their race/ethnicity. Jews with some european blood admixture have the ability to "hide" in plain sight which is why they are such a subversive element. the obvious counter, of course, is to explicitly identify them as Jews, which all historical societies have done, usually culminating in their physical removal. it is uniquely the 20th century in which the Jews have been allowed to infest foreign nations without being identified as Jews, and it is the Jewish behavior of this Jewish century which Kevin MacDonald so explicitly catalogs in CoC.

[Anonymous No.14202317]

>>14197385
>Jews are a minority
>therefore, they stand to benefit from influencing the culture of their host-country to be friendly to minorities, aka be increasingly egalitarian or even xenophilic
That's basically all this book says, and it's not like you can argue with it. At most you can say "yeah but that's not limited to jews", and I somewhat agree, although other minorities are obviously less successful. The greatest achievement of this book is that it gives an explanation for jewish power beyond simple nepotism and also disregards the need for a grand conspiracy of a secret council or something like that, which is a normie-repellant. Instead it's the natural consequence of the aligned self-interests of a group

[Anonymous No.14202322]

>fact check

[Anonymous No.14202338]

>>14197385
Many, one even posted higher up. Cofnas does a good job at debunking but the post in question has not a single response. Cofnas arguments are well thought out and should put the issue to rest, and the fact that Mcdonald has sources which do not line up with his arguments or straight up misrepresentations of said sources should be enough to set the record straight.
However the greatest problem lies in the fact that to debunk a good lie one needs to spend great amounts of time and work. One cannot debate all the "bad" ideas, because for every "good" idea there are a thousand "bad" ones. The debunking of said "bad" idea also relies upon the reader to actually read it, and if it is an academic paper with complex terminology, it makes it even worse, as the usual person would probably not read many pages of complicated academia jargon only to prove their own opinion wrong.

[Anonymous No.14202361]

>>14198313
Why? It's important to bring awareness to anti-White hate

[Anonymous No.14202372]

>>14202338
That's one steaming pile of rabbinical spitter you got there.

[Anonymous No.14202405]

>>14197531
What's even the argument being put forth by the book? I didn't think a rebuttal was even in order. Regardless of how Jews gain power, they still earn it and deserve the power they currently have.

[Anonymous No.14202420]

>>14202405
The argument put forth by the book is that jewishness is a group evolutionary strategy, jews outcompeteing non jews and so forth. He talks alot about the "jewish identity" prevalent in many of the 21st centuries intellectual movements. People in the frankfurt school being jewish and how theory is beneficial for jews, he seems to think is proof that they are motivated by jewish ethnic interests, but completely disregards other influential jewish thinkers like Chomsky for example, who is very anti-israel. It just seems like grasping at straws to me.

[Anonymous No.14202428]

>>14202420
But how is that an argument? "Jews act in their own self-interest like everyone else and are also very intelligent, so they are successful" ... is not an argument, it's practically a compliment.

[Anonymous No.14202454]

>>14202428
Makes you wonder why they would ban it and dismiss it as antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.14202460]

>>14202454
Probably because it mobilizes certain people towards taking action, an effect which doesn't require the theory to be a proper argument.

[Anonymous No.14202475]

>>14202460
That's a fucked up way of thinking about things.

[Anonymous No.14202493]

>>14202454
What do you mean "ban it", I can buy the book on amazon if id like too. The book is also deemed to not be up to the standards of academia, since many of the sources he cites for his "big reveals" are either false, misrepresentated or cherry picked.

[Anonymous No.14202498]

>>14202475
Sorry, what?

[Anonymous No.14202507]

>>14202493
Correction, actually not on amazon, but is available at the publishing site and at barnes&fucking noble

[Anonymous No.14202520]

There's always this one Jew going into full gear whenever a thread about this book comes up, kek.

[Anonymous No.14202522]

>>14202475
It's a reasonable way of thinking about things, especially given that there have been multiple synagogue shootings in the last few years since le alt right meme took off
>inb4 oy vey muh six gorillon XD
I don't really care about the shootings any more than the other frequent mass shootings we get, but if you're going to deny the connection you're being deliberately dishonest.


and anyway, the book isn't banned just because you can't buy it on amazon. It's very easy to get a copy. yet another lie

[Anonymous No.14202529]

>>14202493
it was banned from Amazon a few months ago. and only Jewish academics would claim that it is not academic. it is exhaustively footnoted and sourced

[Anonymous No.14202536]

>>14202522
why is it that academic works examining Jewish power are banned from sale, but every other subject, no matter how provocative or revolutionary, is permitted to be sold?

[Anonymous No.14202554]

>>14202536
What books?
How can I even validate such a claim (and you've already shown yourself to be a liar, so I know I can't trust anything you say) unless you give me some titles to check for myself.
Now I won't deny that a lot of books about jews and "jewish power" are supressed and many outlets will refuse to sell them, but to characterise that as a ban when you can still very easily buy a copy is very sneaky. Kind of like what you claim jews do with "pilpul" in a way, funny that

The reason places won't sell these books, again only some places you can still get them if you must, is because as already stated they clearly lead to violence. And yet another lie to imply that only books about jews have experienced this. That's a filthy habit you've got anon

[Anonymous No.14202589]

>>14202554
i'm going to need a big fucking citation as to why Culture of Critique incites violence, but books about communism, black nationalism, islam, revolution, white privilege, anarchism, and myriad other subjects, do not. if that's your argument then literally tens of thousands of books would need to be destroyed, and urgently. but no, it's literally just books questioning Jewish narratives or Jewish power
>https://codoh.com/library/document/4266/
>https://www.amren.com/news/2019/02/press-release-amazon-now-banning-books-based-on-political-content/
>https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/12/amazon-bans-culture-of-critique-and-separation-and-its-discontents/

[Anonymous No.14202642]

>>14202589
First, even if it does not incite violence, it is correlated with anti-semitism, yes? Richard Spencer talks of it, praises McDonald to the point of saying that CoC is vital to understand the alt-right. Amazon is a privately owned company, so it is not so surprising that they will not sell a book with anti-semitic correlations, especially since anti-semitism is a really touchy subject nowadays.
Also nice little sly shift there at the end, "thousands of books would need to be destroyed" no one said anything about destroying books my friend, you are not exempt from reading it or owning it, as you can still buy it on Barnes & Noble for example. The literal only reason it is not on Amazon is because of the common narrative that anti-semitism is a bad thing, and they do not want to sell such a product, nothing more, nothing less.

[Anonymous No.14202662]

>>14202589
Of course it's impossible to prove something like that definitively, but if you think that the recent alt-right shooters like the two synagogue shooters or that guy who killed those Mexicans wasn't an obvious fucking /pol/ack who may not have been intelligent enough to read CoC himself but certainly watched a bunch of youtube summaries of it then you're playing dumb
and I would argue that certain books about Islam, black nationalism and anarchism/ communism especially, certainly can lead to violence.
I also didn't say that CoC should be banned or destroyed, how does me simply pointing out that you're lying about it already being banned imply I want to ban it??
You just can't fucking help yourself lying or making shit up in every other sentence, you're almost pathologically dishonest.
I don't advocate burning, destroying, books.

Again you can keep repeating this Goebbels style "big lie" that only books that are mean about jews get banned or supressed and nothing else does but it doesn't make it any more true

[Anonymous No.14202667]

>>14202642
you're shifting, shlomo. you explicitly claimed that "it leads to violence" and used that to try and pilpul an explanation as to why it is not on sale on amazon. but this is clearly not the reason why, as demonstrated by the fact that amazon has no problem selling all manner of violent revolutionary texts and books espousing hatred or antipathy towards any number of people, systems or ideologies. and what jews in power label anti-semitism is only a touchy subject with those who believe jewish power should never be questioned, ie jews and retards

[Anonymous No.14202681]

>>14198219
>but Knasgaurd said
So fucking what?Mein Kampf is interesting enough to read.

[Anonymous No.14202693]

>>14202662
the reason it was removed is because jews in power demanded that it be removed. which makes your attempts to obfuscate this very obvious fact by referring to random events that no one cares about ridiculous

[Anonymous No.14202714]

>>14202667
Not him, I did not claim that it incited violence, I just said that Amazon did not want it on their website.

[Anonymous No.14202721]

>>14197385
>jews are more ethnocentric than average
>50% of jews in america are married to gentiles

[Anonymous No.14202733]

>>14202721
That doesn't mean what you think it does because Jews believe ethnicity is passed maternally. A female Jew can marry whoever she wishes and the children will be considered Jews no matter what.

[Anonymous No.14202738]

>>14202714
amazon does not make a habit of editorializing its wares. they are not publishers curating a book shop, they sell absolutely everything, and indiscriminately. to remove a book from sale is therefore an extremely rare action and can only occur as the result of external pressure. pressure applied, in this case, by the (((people))) described in Culture of Critique

[Anonymous No.14202746]

>>14202738
it was on there for ages though, the books was only removed after there was a public outcry following some shootings and also it was removed alongside a bunch of other alt-right/ reactionary literature many of which didn't even talk about jews like stuff about gay conversion therapy

[Anonymous No.14202767]

>>14202733
why are Jewish men marrying gentile women?

[Anonymous No.14202772]

>>14197385
What's his explanation for disproportionate Jewish involvement in western anti-Zionism?

[Anonymous No.14202775]

>>14202767
Go ask them. What the fuck kind of question is that?

[Anonymous No.14202777]

>>14197385
I didn't read it, but the premise just seems very banal.
Of course Jews have above average levels of survival skills (at least as a historic record so far), otherwise they wouldn't have existed as a group for 3000 years.

The problem I have is that people go from this to all kinds of unsubstantiated conclusions about Jews wanting to destroy this and that, ignoring every counter argument along the way.
Also some stupid nationalists are using them as a scapegoat, instead of employing some well needed self criticism, which just makes me mad from a nationalistic perspective.

[Anonymous No.14202782]

>>14202777
if you actually read it then you wouldn't describe the conclusions as unsubstantiated. what are these supposed counter arguments?

[Anonymous No.14202784]

>>14202767
Try thinking about it. If a male Jew can't propagate the race, what does it matter who they marry?

[Anonymous No.14202798]

>>14202782
>what are these supposed counter arguments?
there's no argument to begin with, just assertions that the jooz have sinister motives.

[Anonymous No.14202805]

>>14202782
Too many to mention. From various intellectuals who promote opposite ideas to the fact that Jews (supposedly) keep inviting Jew-hating Muslims into Europe.
I was listening to Greg Johnson trying to explain the latter and he basically said it's some Jewish 3D chess, that being persecuted is actually a good thing. Well, if you can explain away everything like this, how can you have a rational debate? Literally anything Jews do can be used as an argument then.

[Anonymous No.14202810]

>>14202784
>f a male Jew can't propagate the race, what does it matter who they marry?
why does Judaism forbid it then

[Anonymous No.14202818]

>>14202810
Because they prefer Jewish kids to have Jewish fathers. Stop being retarded.

[Anonymous No.14202829]

>>14202818
well there's the answer to your question
>>142027848
>what does it matter who they marry?

[Anonymous No.14202857]

>>14202829
When it comes to the propagation of the race it doesn't matter. If you want a Jewish father for your kids, it does. You're trying to be clever but it's not working.

[Anonymous No.14202860]

>>14202857
>When it comes to the propagation of the race it doesn't matter. If you want a Jewish father for your kids, it does.
if Jews are super ethnocentric they would care about both intensely. Evidence doesn't fit his thesis again.

[Anonymous No.14202878]

>>14202860
Yeah, sure dude.

[Anonymous No.14202879]

>>14202798
the motives need not be more sinister than their extreme in-group preference. what is sinister is that jewish actions, uniquely, cannot be examined without inviting a chorus of execration, despite being the richest and most powerful ethnic group in the world

[Anonymous No.14202885]

>>14202879
>dominates
learn what words mean

[Anonymous No.14202888]

>>14202878
you're trying to be clever but it's not working

[Anonymous No.14202892]

>>14202879
>despite being the richest and most powerful ethnic group in the world
yeah i'm pretty sure the Han Chinese are more powerful just by virtue of numbers.

[Anonymous No.14202894]

>>14202860
They care about both intensely, which is precisely why it's passed down through the mother. A Jewish mother will always have a Jewish child, while a gentile woman pregnant from a Jewish man might lie about it (she's actually pregnant from a gentile) and thus have a non-Jewish child. They're so ethno-centric they don't want to risk having a gentile woman lie about being pregnant by a Jewish father.

[Anonymous No.14202897]

>>14202879
>extreme in-group preference
this is what we call in logic begging the question

[Anonymous No.14202898]

>>14202805
but you haven't engaged with the evidence, which is jewish actions over the 20th century, exhaustively documented in CoC
watch this video of jews talking among themselves if you want some intuitive understanding of why they do what they do in Europe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW38xni5PxE

[Anonymous No.14202906]

>>14202892
per capita, gaynigger

[Anonymous No.14202912]

>>14202894
Yeah but apparently some Jews don't marry Jews therefore they have no in-group preference. /pol/ BTFO'd yet again. You can stop looking at this issue now.

[Anonymous No.14202915]

>>14202906
say that next time. it'll make the jooz sound less scary but you'll be more accurate

[Anonymous No.14202916]

>>14197385
I am so very very tired of this. How many times must the jewish boogeyman be brought up by /polacks/ who emigrate here to spout their bile.
Noone of the jew-haters who come here argue in good faith, all they want to do is to jerk their limpid dicks by shouting at other people over the internet about how right they are and how brainwashed everyone else is.

[Anonymous No.14202921]

>>14202912
>some
about half in America

[Anonymous No.14202926]

>>14202894
>They care about both intensely,
we already established they don't

[Anonymous No.14202928]

>>14202926
How convenient to ignore the rest of my post like that. Good job convincing those evil Nazis they're wrong

[Anonymous No.14202929]

>>14202921
So? Therefore they don't have an in-group preference? You're either very stupid or you're running interference.

[Anonymous No.14202930]

Query, if Jews are so ethnocentric why haven't they just nuked the Palies by now?

[Anonymous No.14202938]

>>14202929
It's apparently a quite weak preference.

[Anonymous No.14202940]

>>14202915
nice attempt at diversion, shlomo

[Anonymous No.14202942]

>>14202928
>>14202894
>while a gentile woman pregnant from a Jewish man might lie about it (she's actually pregnant from a gentile) and thus have a non-Jewish child. They're so ethno-centric they don't want to risk having a gentile woman lie about being pregnant by a Jewish father.
WHEN HAS THIS EVER BEEN A THING

[Anonymous No.14202947]

>>14202940
you're trying to be clever but it's not working

[Anonymous No.14202949]

>>14202942
It's just a common sense insurance policy against paternity fraud, which is common in 2 to 10% of all couples depending on which source you like. You're not refuting shit by just caps locking the equivalent of "are you kidding me?!"

[Anonymous No.14202953]

>>14202928
when the first sentence is a lie i tend to do that

[Anonymous No.14202954]

>>14202938
Yeah, walk it back.

[Anonymous No.14202956]

>>14202733
>t does because Jews believe ethnicity is passed maternally
not all Jews believe that

[Anonymous No.14202959]

>>14202954
>JEWS SOMETIMES PREFER JEWS
next you'll be telling me they have ten fingers and ten toes.

[Anonymous No.14202966]

>>14202954
What is "it" referring to in your sentence?

[Anonymous No.14202976]

>>14202953
People like you who spout /pol/ is wrong about everything while not refuting any so-called idiotic arguments of them are precisely the type of people who push more people to the rightwing. You're showcasing your bad faith and ignorance to everyone reading your posts and you make your side look bad by association

[Anonymous No.14202979]

>>14202956
Yes they do. Some will pretend that people can convert to Judaism but they don't actually believe it. This is why when a Jew meets another Jew for the first time they will always ask if their mother is Jewish. They can call themselves Jewish and follow trhe commandments but they're not accepted. This is why Israel doesn't allow converts to bring non Jewish family into the country.

[Anonymous No.14202982]

>>14202966
Your fathers mutilated cock.

[Anonymous No.14203000]

I genuinely think Jews are a demon race.

[Anonymous No.14203002]

>>14197531
based

[Anonymous No.14203008]

>>14202979
>This is why Israel doesn't allow converts to bring non Jewish family into the country.
citation needed

[Anonymous No.14203012]

>>14202898
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW38xni5PxE
Can you explain what you understand from that video?
And in what way does bringing in Muslims help the Jews, even if it ends up in persecution?

[Anonymous No.14203015]

>>14202976
nice attempt at gaslighting there /pol/

[Anonymous No.14203026]

>>14203008
I don't give the single tiniest shred of a fuck if you believe it's true or not.

[Anonymous No.14203028]

>>14203015
>you're not actually refuting anything and this makes your side look bad
>s-stop gaslighting
what?

[Anonymous No.14203043]

>>14203026
cool thanks

[Anonymous No.14203081]

>>14197385
How about modern jews being the minority with highest rate of intermarriage (over half on average and much higher in the socieconomically successful) and one of the lowest rates of cultural retention (ie. the children of mixed couple being jews)

Rapes Macdonalds theories on endogamy so bad that he has been reduced to claiming that all statistics on the matter have been systematically tweaked.

[Anonymous No.14203088]

>>14203012
from the perspective of a Jew, a nation is always dangerous, because if it has a tribal sense of belonging then it can always identify them as an outsider. their strategy, be it consciously or otherwise, is then to break down these nations sense of identity while retaining their own.
what one might get from this video is an understanding that it is Europe and the European people specifically that they hate for both the Romans and Christianity, and more recently for Germany's nearly successful attempt at repelling their Bolshevik revolution. and Jews bear grudges forever. very feminine in that respect
the conclusion is that Europe can only be made safe for Jews by completely destroying its links to its past. flooding it with Muslims, sending it into "multicultural mode", aids in this process so long as Europe is not allowed to defend itself using nationalism, which Jews have been very successful at preventing by invoking the Holocaust at every opportunity and lobbying for, and achieving, the criminalization of so-called hate speech. it's not like they're infallible. if one could actually talk about what Jews are up to then most of this would go away very fast.

[Anonymous No.14203224]

In some places like Florida it's actually against the law for the government to contract with workers who boycott Israel. They don't have any ethnic interests though. Move along, citizen.

[Anonymous No.14203249]

>>14203088
Of course it's not going to convince you, and I'm not really interested in trying 2bh, but for those of us who have actually met jews before this whole little narrative is beyond absurd.
I went to school in a suburb, knew people who were jewish at college, some of them don't even know anything about the Bolsheviks or ancient rome
Most of them were basically just normies

I'm sure there are some secret elite jewish factions doing sinister things, although there are also non jewish groups like that (masons, etc.)

[Anonymous No.14203319]

>>14202979
>>14203008
As someone with only a Jewish father, jews never consider me Jewish and are usually hostile when I say that I am, so I do not say it anymore. As for Israel, they have a lot of restrictions. I.e. messianic Jews, ethnic Jews that recognize Jesus as a prophet, are not considered Jewish

[Anonymous No.14203846]

why does Amazon sell the first volume in the trilogy but not this one

[Anonymous No.14203862]

>>14197724
Discredit by association? Nice try kike

[Anonymous No.14204140]

>>14202338
>copying and pasting rational wiki into the 4chan lit submission box
oh nonono

[Anonymous No.14204197]

>>14198371
It is more than enough to gas them all for me, good thing no on will ever have to rely on your judgment for anything or care what you think

[Anonymous No.14204604]

>>14204197
beautiful image