BTFOs fascists and natsocs

[Anonymous No.14194654]

Has anyone else come close to him?

[Anonymous No.14194666]

Who was in the right?

[Anonymous No.14194669]

>>14194654
Bowden and Yockey are a more modern version of Evola. Maybe Dugin

[Anonymous No.14194671]

also christcucks

[Anonymous No.14194673]

>>14194666
checked

[Anonymous No.14194684]

>>14194669
Cringe

[Anonymous No.14194687]

>Evola

[Anonymous No.14194689]

>>14194673
http://www.jewishhistory.org.il/history.php?startyear=710&endyear=719
>12 March, TOLEDO (Spain)

>The Jewish inhabitants opened the gates for the Moslem invaders under Tarik ibn Zayid marking the end of Visigothic rule in Spain and the beginning of 150 years of peace. Thus began what was known as the Golden Age of Spain. The Iberian caliphate was independent of Baghdad and encouraged the flowering of Spanish-Jewish culture at the same time that it was being suppressed by the Baghdad caliphate.

[Anonymous No.14194692]

>>14194669
>Bowden
Need to read/watch more of him so I can't offer a real opinion
>Yockey
Solid, but Imperium was written during the Cold War. Needs to be updated
>Dugin
Too hostile towards the anglosphere. Ultimately he wants an Orthodox-Slavic centric empire.

consider checking this out if you're interested in Dugin. It is a written debate between him and this brazilian philosopher named Olavo de Carvalho. Great read
http://debateolavodugin.blogspot.com/

[Anonymous No.14194716]

Why did Evola love Kabbalah so much?

[Anonymous No.14194717]

>>14194692
here's a /bowdenpill/ chart

[Anonymous No.14194756]

>>14194716
because the dude loved tradition. what he hated was secular judaism
http://www.juliusevola.net/excerpts/Unlike_the_Jewish_Tradition,_Political_Freemasonry_%26_Secular_Judaism_are_Merely_Tools_Subordinate_to_Vaster_Influences.html

[Anonymous No.14194827]

>>14194654
People on here seem to shit on Evola a lot but I think they have never actually read him before
He is completely unlike the person the internet paints him as

[Anonymous No.14194832]

>>14194717
>the one intelligent traditional right wing writer and orator of the 21st century
>fucking dies young
what sin did we commit to deserve this fate

[Anonymous No.14195333]

>>14194827
it's because the virgins of /lit/ don't want to be associated with /pol/

[Anonymous No.14195364]

>>14194666
>Look mom, I posted it again

[Anonymous No.14195370]

>>14195333
evola would hate /pol/

[Anonymous No.14195383]

>>14195370
he would've fit right in with the rest of the spergs. he's that European who is always railing on Americans and posting burger memes

[Anonymous No.14196461]

>>14195383
No, he would be impressed with /pol/'s anarchic right-wing energies but would ultimately be repulsed by their bourgeois fascist degeneracy.

[Anonymous No.14196497]

>>14196461
I think we all know what Evolas Political ideology really was

[Anonymous No.14196504]

>>14196497
Evola was just an orientalist, nothing else.

[Anonymous No.14196534]

>>14194692
>Too hostile towards the anglosphere.
No such thing.

[Anonymous No.14196641]

>>14196461
He would absolutley despise it and the internet in general.

[Anonymous No.14196646]

>>14196641
meant for >>14195383

[Anonymous No.14196647]

>>14196461
Im sorry did you just imply Evola was an anarchist? He was the exact opposite

[Anonymous No.14196773]

>>14194666
>a muslim, evolol, a madman, 2 internet grifters and some literally whos
vs
>a bunch of jews

Can I sit this one out?

[Anonymous No.14197368]

>>14196647
He isn't an anarchist, but going by my reading of Ride the Tiger, he favors a type of individualism that is similar to Ernst Junger's concept of the Anarch in his book Eumeswil.

[Anonymous No.14198193]

>>14197368
and junger explicitly explains that the anarch is not an anarchist, the anarch favors authoritarian rule

[Anonymous No.14198253]

>>14194666
I want to remake this image with better representatives because I cringe everytime I see it.

[Anonymous No.14198284]

>>14194669
Dugin's multipolarity surpasses Evola's pagan-imperialism

[Anonymous No.14198319]

>it was real in my mind

I don’t see how anyone can take him seriously.

[Anonymous No.14198369]

>>14198284
Dugin is just an agent of the Kremlin. His critiques of the West are valid though.

[Anonymous No.14198424]

>>14198319
What are you even referring to retard?

[Anonymous No.14198631]

>>14194669
Dugin got BTFO by a whiny ultraliberal jew

[Anonymous No.14198671]

>>14194666
Jordan Memerson does not belong to that group of masterminds.

[Anonymous No.14198680]

>>14194687
KEK

[Anonymous No.14198681]

>>14198671
Peterson & Guenon vs Shapiro & Evola
who ya got?

[Anonymous No.14198691]

>>14198681
Definitely Shapiro & Evola

[Anonymous No.14198750]

>>14198681
Nobody wins. The debate degenerates to infighting as Guenon calls Peterson a satanic psychoanalyst who is mystifying the metaphysical meaning behind symbols, and Evola calls Shapiro a perfidious tribalistic jew.

[Anonymous No.14198770]

>>14198750
Shapiro would call them all anti-semites and win the debate

[Anonymous No.14198814]

>>14198770
Not before Evola releases the occultic energy he's saved up through all the trantric semen retention sex rituals he's been practicing throughout his golden years and revolts against the modern world on Shapiro.

[Anonymous No.14198831]

>>14198814
you're assuming Peterson doesn't slip everybody anti-depressants before the debate which blocks all occult powers

[Anonymous No.14198863]

this thread is amazing

[Anonymous No.14199546]

>>14198831
he would take them all himself before he could spike people and guenon would get fucked on opium, leaving shapiro and evola to fight amongst themselves.

[Anonymous No.14200275]

>>14194666
> based Juden Peterstein digits

[Anonymous No.14201858]

>>14198863
It's reddit-tier and so are you
in fact, I daresay it's worse than that. It's tumblr tier.

[Anonymous No.14201905]

>>14198671
neither do evola, guenon, dugin, or shapiro

[Anonymous No.14201921]

>>14201905
I only know spengler marx freddy foucault and the meme-tiers
no idea who anyone else is
am I a pseud?

[Anonymous No.14201929]

>>14201921
you should know everyone on the left. on the right the ones worth knowing are spengler, epicurus, coomaraswamy, and schmitt

[Anonymous No.14201932]

>>14201929
literally who

[Anonymous No.14201946]

>>14201929
*parmenides, not epicurus. whoops

[Anonymous No.14201957]

>>14198681
whoever wins, we lose

[Anonymous No.14201961]

>>14201921
>>14201929
shapiro is a meme eceleb and dugin is a wacko political theorist and propagandist more than he is a philosopher but I don't think Evola and Guenon are that easily dismissed

[Anonymous No.14202074]

>>14194654
There's a quote of his that's along the lines of "My ideal isn't Hitler or Mussolini, it's Metternich." Evola, from a political perspective, should always be considered a conservative. Pseuds on /lit/ would probably like him because of his snobbery, if only he weren't popular with /pol/acks.

But that doesn't mean his philosophy isn't valuable to Fascists and NatSocs. It's very applicable, especially in the modern era where a very liberal center-right tends to govern most countries, thus blocking out an actual far-right. The people arguing that you can't use someone's beliefs at all just because someone you drew information from might disagree with your overall philosophy are idiots. Hegel wouldn't agree with all of Marx. Nor would Nietzsche agree with all of Hitler. Trying to find points of disagreement, and declaring complete incompatibility is just a sign that the person in question is incapable of actual thought, and just repeats memes.

[Anonymous No.14202166]

Evola was cringe, all he did was add magical thinking to Nietzsche and set out a nice definition of Tradition. Marinetti was better.

[Anonymous No.14202197]

>>14194827
Yes, welcome to /lit/ - literature I'm definitely going to read soon I promise