/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.14180910]

Christcucks BTFO

[Anonymous No.14180927]

>>14180910

[Anonymous No.14180930]

Based. How will they ever recover?

[Anonymous No.14180934]

>>14180910
>science and religion are opposites

[Anonymous No.14180944]

>>14180910
both cannot ever claim to actually arrive at truth. Yet, they are both practical, and that is why we use them.

[Anonymous No.14180946]

[Anonymous No.14180949]

>>14180910
Science it's politicized these days and it's not to be trusted. Example: there is only two sexes but some faggot in the 50s came up with this "gender" term and now in 2019 identity disorders like men believing they're women have been reclassified as normal without any scientific reason but rather purely for political reasons.

[Anonymous No.14180951]

I don't like christcucks either but everyone needs to get redpilled on Whitehead

[Anonymous No.14180957]

>>14180951

[Anonymous No.14180958]

>>14180949
>Science it's politicized these days and it's not to be trusted.
PFFFT.

[Anonymous No.14180959]

>>14180910
>Ignore contradicting evidence
Remind me what the evidence for atheism is?

[Anonymous No.14180960]

>>14180951
Anon what am I looking at here?

[Anonymous No.14180964]

>let me oversimplify it so it looks like I won

[Anonymous No.14180965]

>>14180946
>Flat earth
>Great Flood
>Earth 6000 years old
Errrr

[Anonymous No.14180966]

>>14180949
You are the one that is politicizing science. The findings are that sex is on a spectrum.

[Anonymous No.14180978]

>>14180959
Big Bang
Evolution
Problem of Evil
Divine Hiddeness
All arguments for God failing
Omnipotence paradox
The creator of time can't have free will
A being needs to be temporal to create the world

[Anonymous No.14180985]

>>14180978
Big Bang and Evolution were proposed by Christians, though. Religion and science can go hand in hand if you think about it.

[Anonymous No.14180989]

>>14180949
why would social roles and identification have 'scientific reasons'? what would that even look like?

[Anonymous No.14180998]

>>14180910

[Anonymous No.14181000]

>>14180978
>Nobel Laureate James Peebles Dislikes The 'Big Bang' Theory
https://www.google.com/amp/s/in.mashable.com/science/8516/nobel-laureate-james-peebles-dislikes-the-big-bang-theory%3famp=1

Hmmm

[Anonymous No.14181015]

>>14180978
>Big Bang
What caused it?
>Evolution
Doesn't conflict with Christian worldview
>Problem of Evil
How does "evil" exist without an objective moral standard?
>Divine Hiddeness
How is God hidden when He has revealed Himself to humanity through nature, through his Word, and through Jesus Christ, and when most of the population of the world believes in Him?
>All arguments for God failing
Like the ones that you listed above that have already been refuted?
>Omnipotence paradox
How is omnipotence a paradox?
>The creator of time can't have free will
God by his very nature is the embodiment of free will. I don't understand what you mean by this.
>A being needs to be temporal to create the world
A being needs to be constrained by time to create time? Nonsensical.

[Anonymous No.14181024]

>>14180989
Women are weak. Men are strong. Women have babies. Men provide for them. It's pretty straightforward and universal across all cultures. It's not even a hint by Nature. It IS Nature.
>>14180966
Anomalies and abnormalities should be treated, not accepted as normal.

[Anonymous No.14181026]

>>14180998
cringe

[Anonymous No.14181045]

>>14181026
cope

[Anonymous No.14181090]

>>14180910

perform experiment>does the evidence support the idea?>no>perform experiment such that it does>i'm pickle rick

[Anonymous No.14181093]

You ask me: What is the most fundamental error of all these religions? There are many errors and they are all fundamental, but first I would like to talk about the most fundamental. The most fundamental error of all the religions is that none of them was courageous enough to accept that there are things which we don't know. They all pretended to know everything, they all pretended to know all, that they were all omniscient.

Why did this happen? - because if you accept that you are ignorant about something then doubt arises in the minds of your followers. If you are ignorant about something, who knows? - you may be ignorant about other things also. What is the guarantee? To make it foolproof, they have all pretended, without exception, that they are omniscient.

The most beautiful thing about science is that it does not pretend to be omniscient.

Science does not pretend to be omniscient; it accepts its human limits. It knows how much it knows, and it knows that there is much more to know. And the greatest scientists know of something even deeper. The known, they know the boundaries of; the knowable they will know sooner or later - they are on the way.

[Anonymous No.14181096]

>>14180965
Bible doesn't actually say how old the Earth is, the 6,000 year figure is arrived at by adding up all the dates mentioned in the Bible in the 20th century when American proddie laity started rejecting the understanding of evolution and other scientific concepts.
Legitimately, the first book that argues for a young Earth was published in 1923 by a Seventh Day Adventist.
Meanwhile, Catholic scientists (Gregory Mendel) did a lot of the groundwork that would prove evolution, and the Church itself basically didn't comment on it until 1950 when they said it was entirely compatible with the Bible.
The Great Flood, yeah that's kind of dumb, but of course it's a pretty common myth in the Near East.

[Anonymous No.14181109]

>>14181093
>The most beautiful thing about science is that it does not pretend to be omniscient.
Except when you disagree with Global Warming, then Greta calls you a bigot.

[Anonymous No.14181111]

>>14181093
>religion is retarded because they rely on faith!!!
>no wait, religion is retarded because they claim to know everything!!!

[Anonymous No.14181114]

>>14180965
>>14181096
Oh, and the Bible doesn't comment on the shape of the Earth either, and flat Earth was never a common theory after the Classical Period.

[Anonymous No.14181130]

>>14181109
>>14181111
kys dumb niggers

[Anonymous No.14181131]

>>14181114
>and flat Earth was never a common theory after the Classical Period.
In Europe, surprisingly the Chinese kept believing it up until the 16th century.

[Anonymous No.14181133]

>>14181109
i wonder how greta feels about india and china...

[Anonymous No.14181144]

>>14181130
go suck bill nye's wrinkly cock you faggot

[Anonymous No.14181148]

>>14181024
Treat additional chromosomes by..? Or you could stop being so fragile that divergent chromosomes shakes you to your core.

[Anonymous No.14181151]

>>14181130
Osho fag is seething

[Anonymous No.14181158]

>>14181133
How dare you!

[Anonymous No.14181172]

More like:
>Science
>Get research grant
>Structure experiment to get result funders want
>Does the evidence support the idea?
>If not, change alpha value on your statistical analysis so that it does

[Anonymous No.14181197]

Religion:
>have idea
>check if its in the desert manual
>if it isn't, make up your own interpretation about some obscure passage
>>14181133
>countries with over a billion people produce more
Great finding. Now go search CO2 per capita.

[Anonymous No.14181298]

Science side
> ignore current replication crisis and believe every social study without question

[Anonymous No.14181312]

>>14180951
>>14180957
based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.14181313]

>>14181197
>CO2 per capita.
China will reach and surpass America in the next few decades.
Also, the climate doesn't give a shit about per capita.
You're the kind of fag that clapped his baboon hands at the stories in the 90s where Chinese rode bicycles everywhere, only for them to get rich and buy cars by the hundreds of millions.

[Anonymous No.14181315]

>>14181197
Nope, it doesn't co2 per capita doesn't justify the massive population growth along with massive increase in co2, no matter how small co2 per capita is.

[Anonymous No.14181322]

>>14181298
Only social scientists do this. Other scientists in other fields ignore them and only get news about these fields through mainstream media just like everyone else.