The Great Debate

[Anonymous No.14177712]

Principia vs On the Origin of Species

[Anonymous No.14177724]

*blocks your path*

>The human form cannot be transcended, its sufficient reason being precisely to express the Absolute, hence the untranscendable; and this cuts short the metaphysically and physically aberrant imaginations of the evolutionists, according to whom this form would be the result of a prolonged elaboration starting from animal forms; an elaboration which is at once arbitrary and unlimited.

>Materialists, even those who consider transformist evolution inexplicable and even contradictory, accept this hypothesis as an indispensable idea, which moreover carries us outside of science and into philosophy, or more exactly into rationalism with its reasonings cut off from the very roots of knowledge; and if the evolutionist idea is indispensable to them, it is because in their minds it replaces the concept of a sudden creation ex nihilo, which to them seems the only other possible solution.

>In reality, the evolutionist hypothesis is unnecessary because the creationist concept is so as well; for the creature appears on earth, not by falling from heaven, but by progressively passing - starting from the archetype - from the subtle to the material world, materialization being brought about within a kind of visible aura quite comparable to the "spheres of light" which, according to many accounts, introduce and terminate celestial apparitions. [From the Divine to the Human, p. 88]

[Anonymous No.14178946]

>>14177724
>massive pseud
>converts to pisslam
everytime

[Anonymous No.14179307]

>>14177712
Newton of course. His models have utility and the mathematics he helped developed is ubiquitous.

[Anonymous No.14179382]

>>14177712
Its not Newton vs Darwin, It´s newton vs Freud.

[Anonymous No.14179407]

>>14177712
Euclid's Elements.