[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 30 KB, 480x480, 71493795_2334306750219409_7158300332999573504_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14046524 No.14046524 [Reply] [Original]

Woah...

>> No.14046531

>>14046524
Based+repilled
Fuck roasties

>> No.14046555

¿A, woman, without, her, man, is, nothing?

>> No.14046569

>>14046524
Trick question, the initial is right. The absolute state of students.

>> No.14046581

>>14046524
This says a lot about society

>> No.14046582
File: 62 KB, 403x577, 1520959407390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14046582

>>14046524
a woman without, her man is nothing.

>> No.14046589

>>14046524
Just goes to show that english is a silly language with retard-tier syntax. This wouldn't happen with languages that use inflection.

>> No.14046621

>>14046524
Both are true.
>But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

>> No.14046624

>>14046569
This. Also the second revision (the one all the females supposedly did) is a poor composition. The image of "A woman" (i.e. a particular woman) is paired with the image of "man" (i.e. the generic man standing for all men). So the implication of the sentence is that there is one particular woman that gives value to all men.

>> No.14046632

>>14046589
Hungarian is an inflected language and you can still pull let's eat grandma tier silly shit.

>> No.14046639

Who threw that paper airplane?

>> No.14046642

>>14046524
Was the professor fired next day for the transphobic statements of gender duality?

>> No.14046707

>>14046524
The joke is that both options are stereotypically sexist. The professor was shot, and students who were present that day were sent to labor camps.

>> No.14046726

>>14046524
>A woman: without her, man is nothing.
>A woman
particular
>man
general

>> No.14046768

>>14046582
That's Anglo-Saxon level caesura anon.

>> No.14046774

>>14046569
>Trick question, the initial is right.
Fool! There is no period.

>> No.14046789

>>14046524
Who the fuck would punctuate the first sentence like that? Just leave out the commas

>> No.14046988
File: 14 KB, 225x225, 1546828436032.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14046988

man is nothing

>> No.14046991

homos btfo

>> No.14047049

A woman with (Out! Herman) is nothing.

>> No.14047095

A woman. Man, without her is nothing.

>> No.14047121

UXOR SINE VIR NIHIL EST

>> No.14047132

>>14046524
You of course realize this is only possible because english is an australian abbo-tier language completely unfit for actual discourse.

>> No.14047140

>>14047121
you messed up the cases But good attempt.

>> No.14047146

>>14047132
would have gone with uxoris but then that'd make vir the definitive object

>> No.14047152

>>14047121
uxor sine viro nihil est

prepositions like sine and cum require an ablative anon

>> No.14047164

>>14047152
my latin will forever be nominative shit
I wish I did classics instead of this FUCKING STEM degree

>> No.14047186

>>14046524
History = His Story

Library = Lie Bury, where they Bury Lies

>> No.14047201

>>14046524
>"A woman without; her man is nothing."
rate me /lit/

>> No.14047220

>>14046569
Yep. Low IQ college students use too many commas.

>> No.14047265

>>14046707
Hello Slavoj
>sniff

>> No.14047270

>>14046589
inflection is boring

>> No.14047271

>>14046624
Yeah, that would be me.

>> No.14047276

>>14047152
There is no 'o' in the third declension?

>> No.14047305

>>14046624
It does not imply a particular woman just any singular woman.

>> No.14047308

>>14047265
Why does he have such a nose for ideology?

>> No.14047310

>>14046524
A woman without Herman is nothing ;^)

>> No.14047319

>>14047276
vir is a second declension noun

>> No.14047401

>>14047220
I mean, good punctuation is a must for long sentences, but redundancy is as bad as without.

>> No.14047458 [SPOILER] 
File: 30 KB, 407x423, 1571912730922.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14047458

POWERFUL

>> No.14047486

>>14046524
A woman with O. U. T. : her man is nothing.

>> No.14047495

>>14046524
Aw, o man! Without Hermanis' "No" thing...

>> No.14047522
File: 303 KB, 900x1296, 1561287435142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14047522

>>14046524
Once we are make it the other way around for both, we will achieve eternal peace on Earth, brothers.

>> No.14048788

>>14046768
is that good or bad?

>> No.14048808
File: 326 KB, 527x387, eae0w9sb9q831.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14048808

>>14046524
WRONG

>> No.14048827

A ... woman ... without ... her ... man ... is ... nothing

>> No.14048834

>>14046555
checked

>> No.14048852

>>14046524
A woman without her
▲
▲ ▲
man is nothing

>> No.14048871

A woman without. Her man is nothing.

>> No.14048878

a """"woman:"""" without >her, man is not h-ing.

>> No.14048888

>>14047049
underrated

>> No.14048889

>>14048808
:)))))))))))))))

>> No.14048903

>A woman.... AHH FUCK I'M GONNA COOM!

>> No.14048919

>>14046524
Well, to me it looks like gender stereotypes/conditioning are more powerful than punctuation.
Also, the first sentence was already punctuated correctly, the second one has unnecessary commas and the third is semantically incorrect, as >>14046726 showed.

>> No.14048924

>>14048852
Best in thread.

>> No.14049317

A, woman; without her - man is no...- thing!

>> No.14049477
File: 102 KB, 1440x283, 20191024_204918.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14049477

>>14046524

>> No.14049489

>>14046555
based dada poster getting trips

>> No.14049498

>>14046569
>>14046624
>>14047220
>>14047401
This

>> No.14049506

>>14046624
Its not a particular woman, just a woman. I think that checks out.

>> No.14049567

>>14046524
that student cormac mccarthy

>> No.14049591

>>14047201
>;
Smart

>> No.14049926

>>14046524
A! Woman, without her. Man is... nothing.

>> No.14049933

>>14046582
Nice