[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 23 KB, 500x441, wtf pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14039610 No.14039610 [Reply] [Original]

Frankenstein was modernist bullshit written by a decadent degenerate whore, why did you fags tell me it was any good?

>> No.14039728

>>14039610
Because it was actually written by Shelley under his wife's name.

>> No.14039739

>>14039610
>>14039728
It's good and women can write just as well as men, grow up.

>> No.14039740

>>14039610
Really anon? The prose is pretty top tier. Filtered, I guess.

>> No.14039745
File: 41 KB, 800x450, oogaboogaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14039745

>>14039610
> Frankenstein
> Modernist

>> No.14039747

>>14039739
Not him, but isn't there actually a ton of evidence that he wrote a lot of it. "The Man Who Wrote Frankenstein," or something like that lays it all out. Been meaning to leaf through it for a while now, but I keep getting distracted. From what I've seen, a lot of scholars seem to agree with the argument.

>> No.14039752
File: 749 KB, 1613x2559, C3E54373-DEDF-4898-A920-6693ED23C328.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14039752

First two posters ITT need to be shot in the leg with a bb gun

>> No.14039754

>>14039610
The fuck are you talking about? It’s romantic and gothic, not modernist.

>> No.14039761

>>14039752
Aren't you still on suicide watch after that guy blew you the fuck out into space, buttercuck?

>> No.14039770

>>14039610
>frog poster
You have no right to criticize her.
>>14039728
Have sex.

>> No.14039807

>>14039761
not butterfly but that guy was pretty retarded. butterfly destroyed everyone in the thread easily.

>> No.14039818

>>14039807
>>14039761
Did I miss something good?

>> No.14039827

>>14039754
>romantic
Its a satiric imitation of romanticism you twat.

>> No.14039832

>>14039827
it's really not

>> No.14040141

>>14039610
>why did you fags tell me it was any good?
We didn't.
>reading horror schlock

>> No.14040233

>buzzword-buzzword-label I don't understad-ad hominem
So this is the power of /lit/ criticism?

>> No.14040426

>>14040233
what do you expect from a frog

>> No.14040446

>>14039747
>Lauritsen argues that Percy Bysshe Shelley, not his wife Mary Shelley, is the real author of Frankenstein (1818), that the book "has consistently been underrated and misinterpreted", and that its dominant theme is "male love" or homoeroticism

come on

>> No.14040533

>>14040446
What? I don't understand. Theres a lot of homo eroticism and idolization in that book, especially between that captain and Frankenstein

>> No.14040583

>>14039832
brainlet

>> No.14040603

>>14039818
yes
>>14030298
>>14030298