[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.76 MB, 2048x2048, women-with-books-in-library-dp-2048x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13955569 No.13955569 [Reply] [Original]

>The survey found that being too busy, not enjoying reading and preferring to spend their spare time on the internet means men read fewer books, read more slowly and are less likely to finish them than women.
>In fact, nearly three quarters of men would opt for the film or TV version of a book whereas the same percentage of women were as likely to go for the book itself.
https://readingagency.org.uk/news/media/men-prefer-to-watch-big-screen-adaptations-whilst-women-read-the-books.html


/lit/ BTFO

>> No.13955573

>>13955569
Yeah but they're talking about garbage shit, so men are actually making the better choice and not wasting their time on dogshit. not like I'm some sex partisan or something patheitc like that but in this case--men win

>> No.13955577

>male plebs pleb like this female plebs pleb like this
thank you for your contribution

>> No.13955579

Fpbp

>> No.13955580
File: 86 KB, 626x800, copingskills_front-copy_1_lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13955580

>>13955573

>> No.13955604

>>13955577
this

>> No.13955608

>>13955569
>he actually read Phenomenology of Spirit instead of just watching the movie

>> No.13955641

>>13955573
Are you sure? The average man watches and reads the same brain dead bullshit as the average woman

>> No.13955666

>>13955573
Women read more across the board though. Internet imageboards are perhaps the only literature places that aren't dominated by women.

>> No.13955674

>>13955580

Cringe.

>> No.13955700
File: 63 KB, 800x450, Implications_everywhere.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13955700

>internet
>imageboards

>> No.13955701

only idiots take survey

>> No.13955707

>>13955569
>taking surveys
>iq over 80
Pick one

>I read 50 shades of grey and similar
>teehee women iz smurt

Yikes

>> No.13955711

>>13955569
Yeah man. Just look at all those women who read City of God and War and Peace. There's just so many of them!
Not to mention that reading books doesn't mean shit if you can't understand them past the basic emotional level. Most of the lit chicks I know focus on events rather than ideas when they speak about books.

>> No.13956148

From the Marie Antoinette and Anne Rice to Twilight and 50 Shades, my mom has always read the book. This is the kind of book they're talking about.

>> No.13956171

>>13955569
>mfw no wholesome /lit/ gf

>> No.13956196

Men are better than women, end of story.

>> No.13956202

Women are much smarter than men at intellectual things. This has never been a secret.

>> No.13956203

>>13955573
>Not like I'm sexist or anything
>Says something sexist

Really gets the noggin jogging

>> No.13956205

Women suck a mean cock and make a good sandwich but at the end of the day only men should have the study and the woman should always be a servient housewife that's how most logical people see it

>> No.13956209

>>13956196
This

>> No.13956217

>>13956205
>Women suck a mean cock
Not that you'd know

>> No.13956220

>>13956205
Isn't that what Freud said

>> No.13956239
File: 608 KB, 2699x1799, 1569314006937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956239

>women icky! women stupid! men better
itt: homos

>> No.13956243

>>13956205
How embarrassing it must be to not treat everyone kindly and with respect. Them, the mind, not what they're created as. Why refuse happiness to anyone, anon? Don't be arrogant, it's not becoming of a cultured person.

>> No.13956245

>>13956239
that imagine is me everytime I go on 4chan
God I hate gays so much

>> No.13956249

>>13956243
You're the one not treating women kindly.

>> No.13956255

>>13956217
I've gotten women into my bed by quoting T.S elliot and him who wrote heart of the matter

>> No.13956256

>>13956245
You hate homosexuality so much because you're uncomfortable with your own desires. That's okay, I'm sure you'll come to terms with yourself and find a nice boyfriend one day.

>> No.13956266

>>13956249
I'm a woman. Were both biased in our own hypocritical ways. But what else is new?

>> No.13956278

>>13955569
I work at a bookstore. Yes, it's true that the majority of our patrons are women. However, in the two years I've worked here the number of women I've witnessed purchase a serious work of philosophy, history, science etc. can be counted with one hand.

>> No.13956297

>>13955569
There are vastly more moderately intelligent women than moderately intelligent men, yet there are also vastly more highly intelligent men than there are highly intelligent women. Most novels are written by and for midwits, so it is not surprising at all that women should come to dominate literature. Where men excel is in the high arts, avant garde, where you pioneer new forms of thinking, or create and partake in eternal masterpieces.

>> No.13956301
File: 85 KB, 1024x385, 1544121432878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956301

>>13956297
>Where men excel is in the high arts, avant garde, where you pioneer new forms of thinking, or create and partake in eternal masterpieces.
>create and partake in eternal masterpieces.

>> No.13956339
File: 35 KB, 630x630, 5251186_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956339

That's because novels are for women and children... I thought we had been over this already.

>> No.13956355

>>13956266
Lies won't make your dick fall off.

>> No.13956367
File: 28 KB, 640x392, D9mj1yNXoAAyR-D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956367

>>13956256

>> No.13956410
File: 2.94 MB, 740x700, When read Spengler.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956410

>>13955569
Yeah but when its compared women read most the genre chick lit and other type of fiction, what ever that is. Books read by men were about economy, history and politics etc.

>> No.13956417

>>13956203
I didn't say not sexist, I said not a sex partisan. I don't mind sexism, but I don't care about men or any kind of 'male solidarity' either...

>> No.13956420
File: 52 KB, 600x604, 1542563107781.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956420

>>13956410
>economy, history and politics etc.
>men read worthless non-fiction

even more embarrassing

>> No.13956427

>>13956205
But men literally suck cock better than women. They're not exactly good at it.

>> No.13956485
File: 59 KB, 540x720, Toivo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13956485

>>13956420
>History, economics and politics are worthless
This how your average woman thinks

>> No.13956523

>>13955569
Women are actually more witty and more intelligent than men. Butterfly and Nietzsche's Fangirl will come here with some witty remarks and all you guys have in return is "tranny" or "cringe."

>> No.13956632

>>13956203
You don't belong here

>> No.13956788

so many movie adaptations are better than the book
its almost a rule

>> No.13956985

>>13956256
I'm a massive bisexual but I just dislike people who make their sexuality a personality trait.

>> No.13957003
File: 346 KB, 757x1134, 1519848645059.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13957003

Do you know the definition of cope?
It's claiming to be smarter and intelligent than men despite men having built, invented and engineered everything and when it's your chance to build something, at "women's liberation" (lol) prime time, with all the governmental aid in the world, the positive discrimination and every fucking thing being on your side, you still fail to do anything of worth or advance science or technology in anyway.

But you are still smarter because you read 50 shades.
And yet your best rebuttal to anything a man argues is "have sex".

Freud would be proud of this maximum COPE.

>> No.13957049

>>13957003
It must be hard being this fragile. Come here, let me give you the hug you never got from mummy.

>> No.13957080

>>13957049
>gets told
>acts exactly as the post predicted
Thanks for confirming it.

>> No.13957243

>>13957080
What have you done to "advance science", sweetie?