[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 72 KB, 440x406, 1568059525518.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13893894 No.13893894 [Reply] [Original]

>The Postmodernists and the Frankfurt School were all Right wing bro
tfw there are literally no Right wing thinkers with discernible talent so the Right tries get a slice of all the talent and genius on the left

>> No.13893901

Heidegger was pretty talented brah
So were Schmitt and De Maistre

T. po-mo nomo globohomo

>> No.13893907

LITERALLY never seen anyone making such claim.

>> No.13893918

>>13893901
Heidegger was a pseud hack who hid behind mystical language. He is the petit bourgeois of German philosophy.

>> No.13893974

>>13893894
Jesus was a right winger

>> No.13894037

>>13893907
I’ve seen people call Adorno right-wing because he called Jazz a negro mistake

>> No.13894050

>>13893918
>Heidegger was a pseud hack who hid behind mystical language
Sounds like the average Marxist "philosopher"

>> No.13894069

>>13893918
Substantiate your claims.

>> No.13894137

>>13893894
There seems to be a certain degree of commonality between the nominalism, particularism and historicism of the post modern and reactionary variety, which would justify one in calling some element of the post modern "left" right wing.

Some of the criticism of the Frankfurt school seemed at bottom to rest on some notions of romantic reaction against modern industrial society and in this sense approach the premise of a right wing critic of same, and it would also explain why, at the end of their lives, some proeminent critical theorist seemed to have retreated in either religion or some form or another of quietism.

>> No.13894141
File: 321 KB, 580x529, 1569273534279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13894141

>>13893894
based leftist reading list poster

>> No.13894165

>>13893894
>make something up
>Haha, how can you say this! Defend yourself

thread hidden

>> No.13894261

>>13893894
Who are you quoting?