[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 17 KB, 225x225, images (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382307 No.1382307 [Reply] [Original]

A sandwich is better than nothing. But nothing is better than a sandwich.

Uh-oh...

>> No.1382310
File: 15 KB, 150x150, 1211111111o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382310

In the first "nothing" is an object and in the second a negation.

WOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

>> No.1382318

Babby's first pun.

>> No.1382322
File: 10 KB, 429x439, i-have-nothing-to-say.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382322

>>1382310
But nothing is a lack of objects.

>> No.1382332

>>1382322
Grammatically, "nothing" in the sentence "a sandwhich is better than nothing" is the object of the sentence, regardless of the word's definition.

>> No.1382343
File: 36 KB, 500x248, pile-of-sandwich.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382343

>>1382332
So is nothing worse than a sandwich?

>> No.1382352

>>1382343

Depends on your own judgement on what is "better".
But, the meaning of your sentence also depends on whether you mean "nothing" as a thing, or nothing as a negation of a thing.

>> No.1382360
File: 52 KB, 550x520, the-tomwich.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382360

>>1382352
A sandwich is better than nothing. But nothing is worse than a sandwich.

Uh oh...

>> No.1382368

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing#Language_and_logic

>> No.1382384
File: 41 KB, 500x159, calvin-math-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382384

>>1382368
The OP is a classic illustration of the fallacy of reification...

>> No.1382416
File: 141 KB, 303x400, CalvinHobbesAbe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382416

The next post ITT is a lie.

>> No.1382420
File: 66 KB, 400x500, calvin_and_hobbes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1382420

The previous post ITT is the truth.