[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 28 KB, 564x423, harold-bloom-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13787437 No.13787437 [Reply] [Original]

>In 2003, Harold Bloom wrote in the Boston Globe that there were only four great American novelists alive and working: Don DeLillo, Cormac McCarthy, Thomas Pynchon, and Philip Roth.

Is this true? Does it really not get any better than these four?

>> No.13787441

>Don DeLillo
Man, aging and dementia is sad. Bloom really lost it towards the end

>> No.13787443

>>13787437
>Don DeLillo, Cormac McCarthy, Thomas Pynchon, and Philip Roth.
Yeah he's more or less right.

>> No.13787478
File: 6 KB, 219x230, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13787478

TFW no DFW

>> No.13787504

>>13787478
>Asked about novelist David Foster Wallace, who took his own life in 2008, but who has a new book out, “The Pale King: An Unfinished Novel,” put together from manuscript chapters and files found in his computer, Bloom says, “You know, I don’t want to be offensive. But ‘Infinite Jest’ [regarded by many as Wallace’s masterpiece] is just awful. It seems ridiculous to have to say it. He can’t think, he can’t write. There’s no discernible talent.”

>It’s all a clear indication, Bloom notes, of the decline of literary standards. He was upset in 2003 when the National Book Award gave a special award to Stephen King. “But Stephen King is Cervantes compared with David Foster Wallace. We have no standards left. [Wallace] seems to have been a very sincere and troubled person, but that doesn’t mean I have to endure reading him. I even resented the use of the term from Shakespeare, when Hamlet calls the king’s jester Yorick, ‘a fellow of infinite jest.’

>“It’s sort of a dark time. Imaginative energy I think is very difficult to summon up when there are so many distractions. There’s a kind of Grisham’s law [in literature]; the bad drives out the good.”

>> No.13787528

>>13787504
Based

>> No.13787550
File: 1018 KB, 3264x2448, ECicMd8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13787550

>>13787437
>Thomas Pynchon
>novelist

>> No.13787551

>>13787504
Interest. As someone who has read and enjoyed DFW I honestly can't say I disagree that much. Dude is unreadable at times. However, there are some parts of the Pale King that are amazing

>> No.13787906

>>13787504
what a pseud

>> No.13787946

>>13787437
Definitely wrong about Roth

>> No.13787982

>>13787946

Why, when Roth is the best of the bunch?

>> No.13788055

>>13787982
Pynchon > McCarthy > Roth > DeLillo

>> No.13788074

>>13787982
Muh shiksas
Muh goy cattle
Muh embarrassing relatives

>> No.13788100

>>13787946
Roth was an extremely good writer. He is underrated these days, /pol/tards hate him for being a Jew and libtards hate him for being politically incorrect.

>> No.13788120

>>13787437
Out of those only McCarthy and Pynchon are real pals.

>> No.13788121

>>13788100
What's hilarious is that American Pastoral is the quintessential right wing boomer book

>> No.13788140

>>13788074

Which books have you read?

I’ve read The Plot Against America, American Pastoral, and The Human Stain.

I’m about to write an essay about his central theme: existential betrayal.

American Pastoral > Mason & Dixon > Underworld > The Human Stain > Gravity’s Rainbow > Blood Meridian > Portnoy’s Complaint > White Noise > Slow Learner > Mao > The Crying of Lot 49 > The Plot Against America

>> No.13788162

None of you have read Libra and it shows.

>> No.13788168

>>13788162
Is it good?

>> No.13788180

>>13788162
it was good but if thats the peak of America then you people are f*cked

>> No.13788182

>>13787504
Based. And I thought the pale king was amazing

>> No.13788183

>>13787437
>great
>American

>> No.13788235

>>13787504

I tend to enjoy Bloom’s analysis but Jesus Christ what a fucking snob. Peak boomer academy in my opinion.

>> No.13788267

>>13788140
Portnoys Complaint and Sabbath’s Theater

>> No.13788271

>>13788235
Cause he said a book you like is trash? Get a grip.

>> No.13788276

He’s definitely wrong about Roth living.
The Jew is stone fucking dead

>> No.13788282

>>13788276
>In 2003

>> No.13788290

>>13788282
He just died in 2018.
Do a google before you open your stupid fucking mouth

>> No.13788298

>>13787437
Bloom should be ignored primarily because he actually takes Kabbalah seriously, and praises Leaves of Grass for initiating a new age of spirituality in America. Literally an occultist.

>> No.13788308

>>13787504
you know things have gone sour when this old pasta generates unironic ass-chapping

>> No.13788314

>>13788298
And Isaac Newton should have been ignored because he was an alchemist.

>> No.13788322

>>13788298
Get a load of this goy who doesn't want to reveal the sephirot

>> No.13788331

>>13788314
This is your brain on materialism folks.

>> No.13788333

13788290
actual retard?

>> No.13788367

>>13788333
blessed trips wasted on a moron

>> No.13788375

>>13787437
This guy knows all 500 pages of paradise lost by heart. He's basically a literary monk. Wish I had his genetics.

>> No.13788855

>>13788375
He also admits to skimming books he reviews (he calls it "speed reading")

>> No.13788859

>>13788855
where does he review books?

>> No.13788862

>>13788859

Goodreads

>> No.13788902

>>13788862
figures

>> No.13789001

>>13787550
What is that pic? Moar pls....

>> No.13789068

>>13789001
letter written by pynchon
you can search warosu and google for more

>> No.13789110

>>13788168
delillo's best novel, as in not experimental and just him going to town with his strongest suits (set-pieces, military-political angles, conspiracy etc)

>> No.13789193

>>13788375

You sound so fucking gullible.

>> No.13789268

What about Gass?

>> No.13789431

>>13789268
don't mind if I do

>> No.13789437

>>13787437
At the time Tom Wolfe was still alive. Wasn't he highly rated?

>> No.13789479

>>13789437
Bonfire of the Vanities had good reviews. His later novels weren’t quite as well received.

>> No.13789484

>>13787437
Roasties BTFO once again.

>> No.13789569

>>13787478
DFW would be really entertaining to have alive right now.

>> No.13789688

>>13789437
No he was considered middlebrow.

>> No.13790014

>>13787437
Well he definitely thought other writers were good from that era. Whether he thought anything by someone younger than Tony Kushner is good is a good question.

Actually he praised Joshua Cohen's Book of Number's. So that's one millennial he approves of.

>> No.13790024

>DeLillo
Midwit
>McCarthy
Okay, but only on account of blood meridian
>Pynchon
True
>Roth
Lowbrow at best, just a friend of Bloom.

>> No.13790043

>>13790024
What about Sabbath's Theater?

>> No.13790052

>>13790043
His one truly great book. Overrated due to Bloom’s critical praise though.

>> No.13790117

>>13789268
P sure Bloom had a public dispute with Gass or some shit. After all, they were both competing on the same turf, except Gass was a bonafide artist whereas Bloom was essentially a schoolboy. Bloom tends to skip over the post-Nabokovians in general (probably from his inability to wrestle with Nabokov) except for Pynchon, who has the benefit of being his friend. His comments on Gaddis and Barthelme, for example, are limited if not virtually nonexistent.

>> No.13790121

Pynchon > McCarthy > DeLillo >>> Roth

I don’t believe for one second that Bloom’s old ass actually read all of Infinite Jest so his take on Wallace is irrelevant.

>> No.13790126

>>13790117
Did Bloom ever actually meet Pynchon? I know Pynchon is said to have met a lot of writers, though.

>> No.13790137

>>13790126
I’m pretty sure I’ve read something somewhere about them talking on the phone. I know for a fact he was friends with Roth, and still maintains regular correspondance with McCarthy. Pynchon would make further sense given his wife was a major New York editor.

>> No.13790143

>>13790121
This. This was from his era of ressentiment. Pretty sure Bloom stopped reading contemporary lit after Mason and Dixon.

>> No.13790154

>>13790143
He claims to have read Joshua Cohen's Book of Numbers. Might have read it in advance of Cohen's interview, though?

>> No.13790156

>>13790137
Let's be real, he's probably friendly with Delillo too.

>> No.13790595

>>13787437
One guy's opinion.
I like some of Delillo's stuff. Delillo's stuff made me want to read more.

Haven't read the other three, not sure I care if I do unless somebody wants to recommend each author's absolute best work.

>> No.13790605

obviously false, as i was alive and in 4th grade in 2003
fucking retard

>> No.13790607

>>13788162
>nderworld > The Human Stain > Gravity’s Rainbow > Blood Meridian > Portnoy’s Complaint > White Noise > Slow Learner > Mao > The Crying of Lot 49 > The Plot Against America

Is Libra worth it? I was going to read Mao II or Libra and never got around to it.

>> No.13790624

>>13790607
Slow Learner?

>> No.13790720

>>13790624
didn't read the other ANON's post, my bad man
is it his best?

>> No.13790813

>>13790595
Gravity’s Rainbow
Blood Meridian
American Pastoral

>> No.13790884

>>13787437
goddammit bloom is one ugly motherfucker just look at his stupid smelly lip. Sitting next to him would be my own personal hell as I'm sure he smells like very VERY rancid shit and piss

>> No.13791132

No love from Bloom for the ace, Mr. Kennedy, William Kennedy? If the city of Albany were to be destroyed, it would be possible to rebuild it by reading Kennedy’s novels.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TWQzXPZFojk

>> No.13791477

>>13787504
>in the end, it turns out i was the fellow of infinite jest

>> No.13791678 [DELETED] 

>>13790605
pyw>>13790607