[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 57 KB, 700x540, 359538.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

13765705

Anonymous Thu Sep 5 16:00:31 2019 No.13765705 [Reply] [Original]

how to get into philosophy of technology?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 16:46:28 2019 No.13766025 Technology was a mistake.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 17:35:48 2019 No.13766340 >>13766025 Ted, go home, you are drunk. In some extent, you are not wrong tho

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 18:51:34 2019 No.13766758 McLuhan, Ellul and Marcuse have written great works on it, learned a bit about them in a Philosophy of Technology class

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 18:55:50 2019 No.13766778 >>13765705 when philosophy majors feel insecure, so they try to attach "science" or "technology" to feel relevant. just own it. philosophy is the most important subject. you don't know enough science to do Phil of science anyway.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 18:58:43 2019 No.13766792 Wiener, Bateson, von Foerster, Lewis Mumford for some cybernetic inputs. Morozov is fine too I think.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 19:24:09 2019 No.13766950 >>13765705 Bruno Latour, John Law, Karin Knorr Cetina. They take full account of the agential mess of humans/technologies. They're not technological determinists as Mcluhan/Innis/Virilio for the most part. They're agential realists.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 5 19:29:02 2019 No.13766989 also Nick Couldry, Andreas Hepp for the Internet in particular.