/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13735716]

Eugenics would literally solve all of the worlds problems, but people don't want to do it for fear of "violating people's rights".
Imagine if everyone under 120 IQ was sterilised. In one generation they die off. Greenhouse gas emissions plummet drastically, art is revitalised, overpopulation is no longer a problem, common parlance is enhanced, resources reappropriated, race struggles eliminated since all races will be equal in intelligence, crime would fall, etc.

Are the reproductive rights of retards really worth more than this utopia?

[Anonymous No.13735744]

>>13735716
We also wouldn’t have these kinds of threads :)

[Anonymous No.13735748]

>>13735716
But most high iq people are ugly, weak, physically and or mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.13735751]

>>13735744
Not an argument, sonny jim

[Anonymous No.13735752]

you realize the standards would be decided by hollywood celebrities, democrat superdelegates, and other kikes, right? the "elite" of our society at present would genocide everybody who isn't a onions-eating coastal faggot satanic pedophile

[Anonymous No.13735758]

>>13735752
I told you it's based on IQ and nothing else

[Anonymous No.13735763]

>>13735716
You're right
>>13735752
But this, so it would never work.
We'll just have to wait patiently for gene editing and general AI to have super people.

[Anonymous No.13735764]

Why stop at IQ? Everyone with a net worth below $20 million USD should be sterilized

[Anonymous No.13735767]

>>13735716
then the 120 IQ people become the bottom rungs of society and assume the responsibilities of what you just mentioned
what difference does it make

[Anonymous No.13735775]

>>13735764
Money != Good genetics despite there perhaps being a correlation.

[Anonymous No.13735782]

IQ is not a particularly reliable measurement of a person's intellectual capacity.
IQ tests only measure pattern-recognition abilities. They don't measure a person's creativity, morals, linguistic skills, work ethic and countless other things.
Another thing is that you can literally train yourself to score better at IQ tests by solving lots of IQ tests.

[Anonymous No.13735783]

autistics should be stralised frist. if vaccines didn't cause autism we should stop the procreating till we know what does cause autism.

[Anonymous No.13735786]

>>13735758
quis custodiet ipsos custodes, retard?

stop phoneposting, it's melting your brain

[Anonymous No.13735787]

>>13735716
>>13735748
>>13735751
>>13735752
>>13735758
>>13735763
>>13735764
>>13735767
>>13735775
/lit/ is for the discussion of literature, specifically books (fiction & non-fiction), short stories, poetry, creative writing, etc.

[Anonymous No.13735790]

>>13735767
Smart people don't commit crime as often.

[Anonymous No.13735797]

>>13735787
I wrote a book about this tho

[Anonymous No.13735803]

>>13735716
The fuck is going on with her leg? Does that poor little girl realize she's hugging a poorly assembled sex doll? Don't forget to check the user's manual, kids. Or, your build-a-mom will look poorly put together.

[Anonymous No.13735804]

I have the best IQ's

[Anonymous No.13735811]

>>13735787
the mods stopped enforcing this a few years back

[Anonymous No.13735815]

>>13735790
Smart people with power makes other people kill for them

[Anonymous No.13735816]

>>13735790
Because in our society they are less likely to end up poor.

[Anonymous No.13735819]

>>13735716
disregarding all the other blatant problems with this concept, we could simply dismiss this idea as retarded because the elite need the laborious masses to support their endeavors. kill off all the slave-brains and no one will be willing to do the basic manual labors that keep society running; farming, building roads, supplying water and electricity, etc. the fact that you didn't even consider this obvious consequence, leads me to believe that you wouldn't even be one of the ones allowed to reproduce, which, by your own logic, makes your opinions invalid. you fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.13735823]

>>13735716
Isn't this almost what china does with their child-limits? Look at how [not] well it's working out for them.

[Anonymous No.13735827]

>>13735786
You're the one who just said such a serious matter would be decided by Hollywood celebs like they have any political power at all.

[Anonymous No.13735845]

>>13735819
>no one will be willing to do the basic manual labors that keep society running; farming, building roads, supplying water and electricity, etc.
The solution to this is obvious enough that it doesn't need to be said. Kill everyone except the farmers and construction workers, or wait until farming and constructuon can become fully automated.

[Anonymous No.13735846]

>>13735819
People will need to make money, so they'll apply to those jobs, lmao. Wages would be high anyway since the majority of the population would be wiped out and their wealth would be seized by the state. Plus, it could be an incremental thing, starting with genuine retards and then expanding more and more.

[Anonymous No.13735860]

>>13735819
>no one will be willing to do the basic manual labors that keep society running
People do the jobs that are available to them to survive, it's not like the average person wouldn't prefer having a higher social position instead of being a plumber, it's just that they know that they don't have the talent to do so.
If the bottom of that society would be made out of people with an Iq somewhere in between 120 and 130 then the requirements for higher positions would be even higher and they would simply adapt to such reality.

[Anonymous No.13735867]

>>13735716
>High IQ people can't be stupid

[Anonymous No.13735872]

>>13735716
we should just kill everyone south of the equator
and all of china

[Anonymous No.13735881]

>>13735845
>>13735846
>>13735860
society is built on the backs of slaves and superior beings cannot function as slaves, no matter how self-interested they are.

[Anonymous No.13735887]

>>13735872
No need to kill, just sterilise. Have patience. Anyway, there are high IQ blacks so i wouldn't want to kill them.

[Anonymous No.13735899]

>>13735881
Please don't reply to my posts unless you actually have an Iq of at least 120.

[Anonymous No.13735907]

>>13735899

[Anonymous No.13735914]

But then who would post on 4channel.org?

[Anonymous No.13735927]

>>13735887
Could it be possible to just create a virus that kills or sterilizes people based on their Iq? We know that there are specific genes related to high Iq.

[Anonymous No.13735932]

>>13735914
Only poltards

[Anonymous No.13735937]

>>13735927
I don't think we have comprehensive knowledge yet

[Anonymous No.13735938]

high IQ people """literally""" need low IQ people to feel good. what good is 130 IQ if everyone else has 150?
it's better to choose for mental fecundity and resilience

[Anonymous No.13735940]

>>13735932
rent free lmao

[Anonymous No.13735945]

>>13735881
In that context people with less than 140 iq would be the subhuman slaves that build the society.

[Anonymous No.13735946]

Isn't IQ distribution based? If you killed all brainlets, wouldn't average IQ drop because the remaining people would be more competent at taking the tests and then what used to be high would become normalized?

[Anonymous No.13735951]

>>13735716
reproduction should be a state business, but IQ isn't reliable though, you can be a dick waste of biomass and still have high IQ

[Anonymous No.13735961]

>>13735932
>trying to diss poltards but actually complimenting them on their high IQ's

[Anonymous No.13735967]

>>13735940
>>13735961
I don't think you got what i implied

[Anonymous No.13735978]

>>13735946
>what used to be high would become normalized?
Sure but the number in itself doesn't matter, it's what it indicates about your ability to process information.

[Anonymous No.13735994]

>>13735978
Yes but it is relative to others. If you kept selecting for IQ for a long time, then eventually what used to be 140 would then become an 80 and so on. And people that are sub 120 are killed, wouldn't that mean we would be killing wholesale what we would regard as geniuses today?