[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 17 KB, 353x563, 1feaea4b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13726012 No.13726012 [Reply] [Original]

Will you faggots stop using a priori wrong? It's maximum cringe.

>> No.13726043

>>13726012
a priori means it can be known independent of any experience other than the experience of learning the language in which the proposition is expressed?

e.g.
>all bachelors are unmarried

>> No.13726052

why dont you sit your a posteriori down, young man

>> No.13726053

A sneedriori

>> No.13726075

>>13726012
Here's an example of a priori knowledge: OP is a fag.

>> No.13726080

no fag

>> No.13726102

>>13726075
Let see:

An OP by definition is a seething incel who is (paradoxically, I go on to suggest) a faggot.

Hmmm. Yes, by that definition OP is a priori a fag.

However, I must raise an objection here. The very definition of OP does not obey the law of noncontradiction in this way: how can one be both an incel and a fag at once?

>> No.13726113

>>13726102
>how can one be both an incel and a fag at once?
easy, he jerks off to gay porn

>> No.13726217

>>13726102
The phrase 'OP is a fag' has existed long before the word incel has entered the language. An OP is the original, which by its very nature is always inflammatory and the cause of its own derision, in other words, faggotry. Hence, there is no contradition, however. The a posteriori of the correction of your conclusion is that you are a newfag and should lurk moar.

>> No.13726254

>>13726113
Based multi-valued logic poster.

>> No.13726772

>>13726053
Feed and Seed are a priori to Sneed. Therefore, CHUCK

>> No.13726782
File: 107 KB, 1200x800, Samuel_Johnson_by_Joshua_Reynolds_2.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13726782

>>13726217
>The a posteriori of the correction of your conclusion
oh nononono