[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 163 KB, 518x800, lolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13626991 No.13626991 [Reply] [Original]

>get a hard-on reading Lolita
t-this is normal, right?

>> No.13627005

pedo

>> No.13627010
File: 26 KB, 380x467, 1565458378481.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13627010

>>13626991
Why do we have a thread about this book everyday?

>> No.13627080

There are bearly any erotic passages.

>> No.13627124

>>13627080
this, people who say lolita is a porn book are outright liars who havent read it

>> No.13627140

>>13627080
there are plenty enough if you're into it

>> No.13627145

>>13627080
In the introduction for the edition I have, there is a quote from a french guy known for pornographic novels that reads something like "what the hell, this is literature"

>> No.13627796 [DELETED] 

>>13627080
>>13627124
>>13627140
>>13627145
Retards, only cumbrains get turned on by outright erotica in books. True intellectuals are turned on by the implication, foreplay of the situation- her sublime red lips. THAT is sexy.

>> No.13627835

>>13627796
and here I'm fapping like mad to Sade
I mean implications are fine, but when it's a sexual scene with implications of murder
my dog gets hungry for cats .

>> No.13627889

>>13627010
>13627010
pedos from /a/ and /tv/

>> No.13628571
File: 97 KB, 500x750, zk3tl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13628571

>>13626991
As long as it's just in response to the prose style, it's fine.

>> No.13628611

>>13626991
same :(

>> No.13628977

>>13626991
yes