[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 60 KB, 552x487, 43065893-2D2E-4CB0-A353-F6C76E892583.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13624864 No.13624864 [Reply] [Original]

Hmmm

>> No.13624867

>>13624864
If you're not a nihilist and value human life you couldn't kill them

>> No.13624869

>>13624864
This still makes me lol

>> No.13624881
File: 60 KB, 582x449, 1520257701316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13624881

the simplest argument to refute anyone is to kill them

radical grugism is philosophically unbeatable

>> No.13624896

ya rape them.. nothing matters

>> No.13624902

>>13624867
>everyone who's not a nihilist is a liberal
what

>> No.13624909

The simplest argument to refute a Tolstoyan is to stab him in a barfight and proclaim Dostoevsky his superior.

>> No.13624910

>>13624902
>everyone who values human life is a liberal

>> No.13624917

>>13624881
>radical grugism
grug see man get head smashed with rock. man had pink stuff in head that leaked out. grug no have pink leaks, so grug not like that man. grug pink stay in grug head, so grug keep moving. pink head stuff is meaning of grug life.

>> No.13624920

>>13624910
I struggle to think of what you would politically call someone who is against all murder other than a radical liberal. Human rights were invented by liberalism bud

>> No.13624929

>>13624920
Liberals care about their own lives, humanitarianism is a separate ideal

>> No.13624940

>>13624920
>what is humanism

>> No.13624945

The simplest argument to refute nihilists, positivists, hedonists, or any *ists is to beat them to death with a heavy stone and start consuming their brain matter right there on the sidewalk

You cannot defeat primalism with your faggy words

>> No.13624950

>>13624929
>>13624940
regardless of semantics the original point was that there are a multitude of alternatives to nihilism that still allow you to kill nihilists (as should happen)

>> No.13625156

TOTAL REFUTATION

>> No.13625395

Based, nihilists can't refute because their opinion is worthless.

>> No.13625484

>>13624950
If you kill your enemies they win

>> No.13625732

>>13624864
Lol, based.
Goes double for nihilism's retarded incel brother: antinatalism.

>> No.13625752
File: 42 KB, 350x465, alpha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13625752

If you've tried reasoning with your enemies, and they're deaf to reason, then simply kill them. You have, in essence, won the argument in both an ontological and practical fashion.

>> No.13625754

>>13624864
Bases

>> No.13625771

>>13624864
Haha, real funny guys but you wouldn't actually resort to violence when talking to a nihilist...right? Like we don't see value in life but we still have a valuable life.

>> No.13625792

>>13625771
Maybe not a nihilist, but like >>13625732 said I'd gladly break an antinatalist's jaw.

>> No.13625868

>>13625484
Why?

>> No.13625877

>>13625868
Argumentum ad Batman

>> No.13625879

>>13625771
Retard

>> No.13625939

>>13624864
arent the only "nihilists" that exist are people with ASPD who are permanently operating on whatever current needs come to mind mode and people calling themselves nihilist are just faggots with suicidal thoughts because if you were a nihilist how in the fuck would even bother with telling anyone or reading shitty literature?

>> No.13626071

>>13624909
Movie adaptation when?

>> No.13626075

>>13625771
>don't see value in life
>suddenly re-sees value when rhetorically convenient

>> No.13626178

>>13624917
if pink stuff is meaning and grug no pink stuff thus grug no meaning and grug a nihilist
desserves to get head smashed with rock