[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 40 KB, 260x410, Vladimir_Nabokov_1969b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596254 No.13596254 [Reply] [Original]

>Balzac, Honoré de. Mediocre. Fakes realism with easy platitudes.
>Camus, Albert. Dislike him. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me. Awful.
>Céline, Louis-Ferdinand. Second-rate. A tense-looking but really very loose type of writing.
>Dostoevsky, Fyodor. Dislike him. A cheap sensationalist, clumsy and vulgar. A prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian. Some of his scenes are extraordinarily amusing. Nobody takes his reactionary journalism seriously. The Double. His best work, though an obvious and shameless imitation of Gogol's "Nose." The Brothers Karamazov. Dislike it intensely. Crime and Punishment. Dislike it intensely. Ghastly rigmarole.
>Eliot, T. S. Not quite first-rate.
>Freud, Sigmund. A figure of fun. Loathe him. Vile deceit. Freudian interpretation of dreams is charlatanic, and satanic, nonsense.
>James, Henry. Dislike him rather intensely, but now and then his wording causes a kind of electric tingle. Certainly not a genius.
>Lawrence, D. H. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. Mediocre. Fakes realism with easy platitudes. Execrable.
>Marx, Karl. Loathe him.
>Pound, Ezra. Definitely second-rate. A total fake. A venerable fraud.
>Sartre, Jean-Paul. Even more awful than Camus.

>> No.13596266

>>13596254
Nabokov liked niggers and butterflies. He was a delusional autist and bluepilled as fuck.

>> No.13596267

>>13596266
cope

>> No.13596279

>>13596267
it's true, though. why would I cope?

>> No.13596291

>>13596279
cope

>> No.13596300

>>13596291
Cope for what? I like his work. His love of niggers (particularly African Americans) and butterflies is disturbing to say the least, though.

>> No.13596303

>>13596300
cope

>> No.13596306

>>13596254
he was cunnypilled so all is forgiven

>> No.13596314
File: 38 KB, 392x250, 1489197185302.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596314

>>13596254
this thread AGAIN

>> No.13596318

>>13596291
cringe

>> No.13596320

>>13596267
>>13596291
>>13596303
cringe

>> No.13596327

>>13596318
>>13596314
>>13596320

cope

>> No.13596328

>>13596254
>Eliot, T. S. Not quite first-rate.
Pretty rich coming from a literal failed poet like Nabokov.

>> No.13596332

>>13596327
yikes

>> No.13596349

>>13596328
>>13596332

cope

>> No.13596350

>>13596254
>my opinions are objective facts that I can just assert without any attempt at defense.
>I am the savior of the canon

>> No.13596354
File: 39 KB, 843x903, 1564631380826.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596354

>>13596327
>>13596349

you fucking lose faggot

>> No.13596359 [DELETED] 

>>13596350
>>13596354

cope

>> No.13596363

>>13596254
All obviously very based.

>> No.13596366
File: 231 KB, 700x525, 4GcvLc9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596366

>>13596254
>complaining about anything being satanic while on 4chan

>> No.13596375

>>13596359
>he can't 4chan
inb4 cope. we heard you alright plebbitor.
giga cope.

>> No.13596378

>>13596366
>>13596375
cope

>> No.13596381

>>13596327
>>13596327
>>13596327
have sex

>> No.13596385
File: 41 KB, 843x903, HOLY SHIT.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596385

>>13596354
WAIT A FUCKING SECOND

IS IT...SATAN?!

>> No.13596391

>>13596378
cope

>> No.13596398

>>13596385
no, it's god. satan is an inverted star.

>> No.13596418
File: 49 KB, 368x500, f01ade0d83a95cb3196fa3a41046809f (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596418

>>13596398
No, a five pointed, upright star is a pentagram. By defintion.

>> No.13596438

>>13596418
in medieval times an upright star was a symbol for god and if you inverted it then it meant the devil. I don't care that wicca or meme religions think.

>> No.13596447

>>13596438
Right right, your magic book is better cause it's older, I know.

>> No.13596460

>>13596447
yes, because it's the original connotation, not the meme revisionist one for teenage emo sluts.

>> No.13596494

>>13596460
And because you're the ultimate authority on what symbols mean, and not how they're ultimately used. Symbols cannot change, and they always mean what they originally mean, which is why a cross is only meant to mean a form of execution and nothing more. Because symbols cannot be change through societal use.

>> No.13596505

>>13596494
you're just salty you're wrong. sorry, nothing personnel kid.

>> No.13596516
File: 367 KB, 960x600, a63cd9e38964634741a5a3fe89055308_XL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13596516

>>13596505
Cope

>> No.13596519

>>13596516
have sex

>> No.13596749

ca/v/eman here.

I thought /lit/ was supposed to be smart or something.

>> No.13596759

>>13596749
not lately. lots of summerfags are here now

>> No.13596819

>>13596749
This is the expected level for Nabokov threads; his banality invites shit like this

>> No.13597775
File: 149 KB, 902x902, Wittgenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13597775

>>13596494
I approve of this post

>> No.13598668

>>13596759
t. redditor

>> No.13598670

i hate when authors and artists i like are mean about each other
it's like when my parents fight
i love you both ok

>> No.13598672

>>13598670
fuck off reddit

>> No.13598865

>>13596254
nabokov is one of these authors who pull a groin trying to make every sentence a memorable one.

>> No.13598869
File: 93 KB, 1805x624, nabokov.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13598869