[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 6 KB, 339x309, 1480025164406.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13592074 No.13592074 [Reply] [Original]

>tfw your interest in pop-OOO embarrasses you professionally

>> No.13592086
File: 50 KB, 500x250, 1459459719249.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13592086

>poopOO

>> No.13592210

having any interest in OOO is embarrassing

>> No.13593135

>The “speculative realist movement” exists only in the imaginations of a group of bloggers promoting an agenda for which I have no sympathy whatsoever: actor-network theory spiced with pan-psychist metaphysics and morsels of process philosophy. I don’t believe the internet is an appropriate medium for serious philosophical debate; nor do I believe it is acceptable to try to concoct a philosophical movement online by using blogs to exploit the misguided enthusiasm of impressionable graduate students. I agree with Deleuze’s remark that ultimately the most basic task of philosophy is to impede stupidity, so I see little philosophical merit in a ‘movement’ whose most signal achievement thus far is to have generated an online orgy of stupidity.

>> No.13593143

>>13593135
Brassier isn't a real human being, that's the only important quality about him. Harman weighs at least twice as much as him.

>> No.13593147

How to get into OOO? What to read?

>> No.13593167

By OOO I understand my last name And by pop I understand Japan youngsters

>> No.13594821

lol

>> No.13595417

>>13592086
based
>>13592210
BASED and correct, no one in the academy takes it seriously anymore

>> No.13595530

theyre just 'microscopic' kantians, they took one side of heideggers thought for an academic friendly 'posthuman kantian' cherrypick. doesnt mean theyre wrong, but the whole project is more an aesthetic art movement which isnt that bad in that aspect

>> No.13595534

The problem I have with OOO compared to other speculative realists is they basically accept Kant was right and work around him with a technicality instead of trying to disprove him

>> No.13595600

>>13595534
theyre humble enough to call it 'speculative' because they are aware and theyre not pseuds. imo latour is their flagbearer