/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13589275]

Why does /lit/ hate him?

[Anonymous No.13589313]

Successful, handsome, smart, charismatic, succinct, good writer, not pretentious, not obnoxious, not a failure, not a loser, etc. Basically the opposite of /lit/

[Anonymous No.13589316]

he reddit

[Anonymous No.13589324]

Derivative boring faggot enjoyed by retarded arthoes and boring pseuds

[Anonymous No.13589328]

>>13589275
I really hate this guy.
I want to punch his face.

[Anonymous No.13589332]

>>13589313
Fuck off, talking vagina.

[Anonymous No.13589359]

>>13589313
By what standards is he "handsome"?
Because if this is true then I'm a Chad.

[Anonymous No.13589360]

>>13589332
Where are your accomplishments? Oh, that's right, you don't have any. You're ugly, nobody likes you, and you are a failure in real life. You will never accomplish one tenth of what Camus did. Once you are dead, nobody will remember you.

[Anonymous No.13589365]

>>13589360
>Once you are dead, nobody will remember you.
Why should I care, dumb whore?

[Anonymous No.13589374]

>>13589365
Why should I care about anything hurrrr durrrr. This sort of thinking is why you are a mediocre failure who doesn't appreciate Camus.

[Anonymous No.13589376]

>>13589359
He's not a gigachad, but he's kinda cute.

>>13589275
>>13589324
Mostly this, but just because he's entry level doesn't mean that he's bad, on the contrary to what /lit/ usually tells you. The central themes of his topic also resonate with a lot of people, unlike, say, the theory of forms.

He's probably one of the best "entry level" authors for someone who's new to /lit/, to be honest.

[Anonymous No.13589380]

>>13589376
*The central themes of his works

[Anonymous No.13589394]

>>13589360
This level of frustration indicates to me that you are projecting your problems and insecurities on others.
You should find a better way to went your frustration anon.

[Anonymous No.13589395]

>>13589360
>> Once you are dead no one will remember you.

Same goes for all of us inbred mongloid. Your argument is deflective and weak. Comparing achievements? Why should he prove something? You are posting on this board just like every other loser here. Your achievements are ar max equal or less to anyone else.

Fun fact: Camus doesn't know your sucking his proverbial fallus since he is has been subtracted into the realm of non existence. Fuck you btw.

[Anonymous No.13589398]

>>13589394
"it's not me it's you" lol

[Anonymous No.13589400]

He's african

[Anonymous No.13589403]

>>13589374
You need a high IQ to understand Camus. That is why I watch Rick and Morty.

[Anonymous No.13589416]

>>13589398
I'm not even that anon, but if it makes you feel better then believe what you want.

[Anonymous No.13589420]

>>13589403
Pathetic argument. People who watch Rick and Morty eat food sometimes, does that mean that eating food is bad?
Of course, if something is easily accessible it's going to attract a certain element of stupid people, but that doesn't mean it's stupid in itself. Are Tolkien and C.S. Lewis bad authors because they made books stupid people could also enjoy? No, they're not. Just admit you're pseud with an inferiority complex and repent.

[Anonymous No.13589468]

Camus, Albert. Dislike him. Second-rate, ephemeral, puffed-up. A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me. Awful.

[Anonymous No.13589584]

>>13589420
>does that mean that eating food is bad?
yes lose weight you fat whore

[Anonymous No.13589599]

I just skipped Camus and went straight to Céline because I liked the latters politics

[Anonymous No.13589965]

>>13589275
he's my favourite author tied with beckett

[Anonymous No.13590110]

because he's not some hyper obscure retard no one actually cares about

[Anonymous No.13590177]

>>13589360
One tenth of zero is still zero