[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 59 KB, 600x370, nicklandrichardrorty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13568439 No.13568439 [Reply] [Original]

Who would win?

>> No.13568446

land

>> No.13568462
File: 218 KB, 480x354, Nick Land.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13568462

>>13568439
>using baby pictures of land
His bones are accelerating too.

>> No.13568469

>>13568462
He looks better than I thought he would.

>> No.13568470

>>13568469
A beacon of Gen X youthfulness.

>> No.13568471

>>13568439
strange pairing for a debate.

>> No.13568477
File: 27 KB, 375x500, rs_3463ec66edb459bd1dd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13568477

>>13568439
This man.

>> No.13568480

>>13568469
that was years ago, he looks even worse now

>> No.13568506

>>13568471

The OP never said anything about a debate.

>> No.13568517

>>13568506
cage match

>> No.13568531

>>13568446
cringe

>> No.13568537

>>13568517

On the nose-y.

>> No.13568539

>>13568446
Rorty would destory him.

>> No.13568790

rorty is the final boss of philosophy

it's just he's not edgy and cryptic and usually people interested in philosophy (especially on this site) get memed easily by fluff and larping and pseudodeep bs

>> No.13568813

>>13568790
this
he is destroyer of pseuds

>> No.13568832

I recognize Adam Neely, but who's the guy on the right

>> No.13568835

rorty wasn't a meemee
land is

>> No.13568956

haha "Nick and Rorty"

>> No.13569264

>>13568471
topic of the debate is liberal democracy

>> No.13569269

>>13568790
>>13568813
rorty is cringe

>> No.13569306

>>13569269
Go to autonomous runaway hyperbed nick

>> No.13569497

>>13569306
land is even more cringe

>> No.13569626

Wittgenstein, Rorty, and Deleuze is the true meme trilogy

>> No.13569677

>>13569626
this

>> No.13569954

>>13568439
It would go something like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CId1iOWQUuo

>> No.13570439

>>13568956
underrated

>> No.13570516

>>13568790
lol rorty's epistemology gets shit on by just about any decent analytic philosopher. It's why he ran away and starting writing about Derrida and Heidegger.

>muh non-propositional awareness can never justify a belief.

Keep in mind he gives no argument for this, it's not obvious and it's at the foundation (ironic given that he's a coherentist) of his work. It's obviously wrong. He's not the final boss, just a decent representation of why pragmatism and coherentism is wrong.

>> No.13570532

>>13568439
Rorty would BTFO this pseud with his ironism immediately.

>> No.13570564

I only started reading Rorty's book recently and it turns out the moderate centrists were right all along