/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13558055]

What do you think the defining philosophical trends of the 2020s will be?

[Anonymous No.13558069]

>>13558055

>>>/tv/

[Anonymous No.13558070]

>>13558055
I don't care about your shitty trends.

[Anonymous No.13558084]

>>13558069
uhm...thats /mu/ anon

>>13558055
someones gotta respond to acc and the general anti-anthropocentric bend of the past two decades or so.

[Anonymous No.13558107]

>>13558055
Statism, catholicism, metaphysical realism

[Anonymous No.13558120]

>>13558084

Whoops, I didn't know she was a pop singer. I thought it was /tv/-esque ... you know

[Anonymous No.13558393]

>>13558055
Something that can complement neo-nationalism

[Anonymous No.13558396]

>>13558055
Probably materialism and futurism, and Christianity as an antithesis.

[Anonymous No.13558407]

>>13558055
Metafiction as guide to reality, a resurgence in Bernays-style propaganda, but metaphysicalized, with a flavor of speculative-fiction-made-real (think Borges). Fantasies of an omnipotent elite reshaping reality according to its whims, and the embracing of fake news, outright and invented historical events. Past fictions become a guide to future actualities – holograms of fucking Johnny Bravo wandering the streets alongside those of Odysseus making his voyage over and over again in the Aegean (tickets will be sold to this). Realism recast as vaguely reactionary at first, then outright fascist. Post-meaning, the medium is the only message. The trajectory of sense becomes tied to what you want to hear, not what I want to say: language screaming through us from the future in self-fulfiling prophecy, using the human body and our digital creations as vehicles. The world falls back to ur-tribalism, mysticism and sacrificing goats: the luxury flat of the future middle class becomes a bunker.

[Anonymous No.13558408]

>>13558055
Schopenhauer

[Anonymous No.13558615]

Transgression

[Anonymous No.13558635]

>>13558407
Metafiction and probably philosophy about culture that embraced all irony about itself as a culture - we lived in post-secular age, I think it will took about 20 or 30 more years before the general liberal idealogy will looked dated.

[Anonymous No.13558680]

>>13558407
>holograms of fucking Johnny Bravo wandering the streets alongside those of Odysseus

dude what the fuck are you saying

[Anonymous No.13558694]

hopefully antirepresentationalism

[Anonymous No.13558700]

>>13558055
No more post-post-irony and "deconstruction", everyone's sick to death of that. Instead, a return to sincerely and simply engaging with the material reality of daily life. This will lead to either A) unironic Communism, B) some sort of Gnostic Christianity a la William Blake, or C) both at once.

[Anonymous No.13558712]

>>13558700
>ome sort of Gnostic Christianity a la William Blake,

but what did he mean by this

[Anonymous No.13558740]

>>13558712
>Thinking as I do that the Creator of this World is a very Cruel Being & being a Worshipper of Christ, I cannot help saying: "the Son, O how unlike the Father!"
>Jesus Christ is the only God, and so am I, and so are You

[Anonymous No.13558743]

>>13558055
Who she

[Anonymous No.13558751]

Materialist psychology of crowds - ethology in advertising, behavioral models for quasi-AI personal assistant spyboxes, addiction driven AI models to promote best social network spammers.

It delivers - thus wins on the market grounds.
Is it right?
Who knows?
It's like evolution, we can quantify and replicate how it works.

[Anonymous No.13558779]

>>13558743
Clairo, the savior of lo-fi indie pop

[Anonymous No.13558785]

>>13558055
the ßible

[Anonymous No.13558791]

>>13558779
Holy shit she's 30. I thought she was like 19.

[Anonymous No.13558798]

Esoteric Islamic mysticism

[Anonymous No.13559003]

>>13558084
>acc
Aren't most accelerationists pro- anthropocentric ?

[Anonymous No.13559042]

>>13558055
Some kind of suicide cult

[Anonymous No.13559570]

>>13558779
she's crap though, at least billie eilish's brother has written some decent songs

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13559583]

>>13558055
>Portraits by Deb

[Anonymous No.13559603]

>>13558055

Self-flagellating, militant eco-spiritualism. Greta Thunberg combined with Joan of Arc.

National capitalism with totalitarian characteristics. China basically.

Militant transhumanism.

Applause-lightism. Ridiculing whatever the funny-looking people on television ridicule, praising what they like.

[Anonymous No.13559808]

>>13558798
Maybe if malcolm x didn't die anon.

[Anonymous No.13559844]

I just listened to Sofia. The autotune is bad, the quality is bad, and I guess that's deliberate. Lofi is trash, anyway, because it's ugliness, not art, even if it's for an "aesthetic." Ugly is not aesthetic, the opposite.

[Anonymous No.13559879]

Unfortunately with the rise of the Internet and technology, people became self centered, losing their sense of wonder about how the world works and the motivation to learn more.

One may argue that this is because younger generations are flooded with information but that is not true. The older generations just didn't put emphasis on critical thinking and how to properly filter it. So the younger generation is just confused and lost. All humans share the same trait which is to adapt to a situation and always choose the simplest ways to achieve their goals. So called laziness is just energy efficiency.

By the looks of it, the future may appear that bleak, but like in nature, only the intelligent and those who are most adaptable will survive.

The shift is now towards ecology, saving the planet, being a mindful consumer, minimalism in general.

[Anonymous No.13559931]

>>13558407

[Anonymous No.13559950]

>>13558779
2many frecks

[Anonymous No.13560030]

Nationalism, aesthetics rebirth (neo-neo-classical), fitness becoming even more widespread than this decade (obesity will decrease), producers will stop rishing CGI in movies, there will be a return to gender polarity as thousands of now adult psychologically ruined "transexuals" come forth as not being such at all wanting their bodies back, death of analytic philosophy as we discover that consciousness is integral to quantum physics.

[Anonymous No.13560050]

>>13558055

Metamodernism and hopefully the death of the postmodern condition

[Anonymous No.13560052]

-

[Anonymous No.13560418]

Eco Fascism
Nationalism
A return to Freud
Minimalism
Mindfullness

[Anonymous No.13560553]

>>13558055
i'm hoping atemporality takes off and all of you jabbering assholes shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.13560886]

>>13560418
All those things are so passe

[Anonymous No.13560888]

sucideism

[Anonymous No.13560892]

Post-Hauntology

[Anonymous No.13560923]

>>13558070
This.
Philosophy aims at truth or it's just poetry

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13561006]

>>13559950
The hell is wrong with freckles? They’re awesome.

[Anonymous No.13561084]

>>13561006
butts has an opinion I agree with? huh, guess you're alright, titfly

[Anonymous No.13561128]

>>13558393
>neo-nationalism
Why do we take words and throw neo in front of it, as if it means something?

[Anonymous No.13561132]

>>13561006
They are the cutest on black women :3

I flirted with a bisexual black with them all the time and made her question her relationship

[Anonymous No.13561156]

>>13558055
PostNeoAccelerationism
Progressive Traditionalism
Speculative Nihilism
DoubleMarxist Generationomics

[Anonymous No.13561172]

>>13561156
Or Marxist-Egoist Subgenerationism

[Anonymous No.13561177]

>>13561128
neo means new, and refers either in essential differences or marginal differences, like in said case, changes in tactics and appearance.

[Anonymous No.13561181]

>>13561132
>cute
>black

[Anonymous No.13561188]

>>13561181
>racist
>respectable opinions

[Anonymous No.13561200]

>>13558070
https://youtu.be/PmIZ05TxBSo

[Anonymous No.13561206]

>>13561188
>faggot
>anything besides shit

[Anonymous No.13561209]

>>13561177
At what point does the idea became entirely new, and no longer justifies the use of "neo"?
Can you have a neo-neo movement? How many neos can a wors have before becoming absurd and why?

[Anonymous No.13561215]

>>13561128
Neologisms are the most high-IQ aspect of philosophy.

If you can't into it you're a pseud.

We're already in the 2020s.

[Anonymous No.13561245]

Neoromanticism or neo-neoclassicism, probably.

[Anonymous No.13561274]

>>13558055
Nationalist populism.

Centralism vs. Subsidiarism.

Accelarationism vs. Primitivism.

[Anonymous No.13561446]

>>13558055
I mean what is the defining philosophy of today? It's too varied and indeterminate to say. Therefore how would it be possible to determine what 2020 would be like?

[Anonymous No.13562041]

>>13558055
a take no prisioners no holds barred capital-F Fascism

[Anonymous No.13562073]

Some form of utopianism, as today.

[Anonymous No.13562188]

>>13559603
I kind of agree anon.

[Anonymous No.13562190]

>>13559950
Absolute pleb.

[Anonymous No.13562199]

>>13558055

transhumanism

The first functional brain interfacing computers will be available around 2027

[Anonymous No.13562231]

>>13558055
It's not even going to be nihilism, you won't actually see any coherent philosophical view emphasized except meme culture (which includes pop culture - it's already in the middle of merging with meme culture), in which actually random things become popular for no reason, people meander through nonsense that others deem funny and they learn to condition themselves to find it funny or exciting as well. The trend of people going "i have all the knowledge in the world at the reach of my pocket, so why would I actually invest time in learning anything deeply if I won't get money from it? Just have fun bro". Reddit-tier herd mentality will continue increasing among the knowing ones - upper-middle class westerners who have access to internet - and if you are not aware of all the things that are "in" at the moment you will be deemed a bad person and ostracized.

[Anonymous No.13562239]

>>13559603
>Self-flagellating, militant eco-spiritualism. Greta Thunberg combined with Joan of Arc.
I want this now

[Anonymous No.13562251]

>>13558055
It seems like crypto-occult spiritualism with headnotes of accelerationism are starting to bubble to the surface, and personally I'm all for it

[Anonymous No.13562262]

>>13562231
It will be very fun for the actual knowing ones - people who have self-discipline, are smart enough not to fall into the meme trap and exploit it for their own gain. The corporation/common people dichotomy in terms of presentation is shrinking, subreddits like r/fellowkids are merely chasing spectres. Smart corporations will (and already have) start manufacturing memes for advertisement purposes without putting their nametag on it, similar as you could see in a Nathan for You episode about the zoo who engineered a viral video to attract customers.
The fun thing about the devolution of the internet culture in general and standards for humour and thought is that corporations won't even have to try in order to appeal to the masses - they're a herd of brainlets and will eat up anything you'll feed to them.

[Anonymous No.13562284]

>>13558069
If you dont think thats a fertile woman you are a fag

[Anonymous No.13562344]

>>13559003

lmao

google "nick land"

[Anonymous No.13562371]

>>13560553

this completely

[Anonymous No.13562458]

>>13558055
We will all be fucking dead, man, there will be no philosophy then

[Anonymous No.13562630]

>>13558055
Eugenics and transhumanism. Might not be until the 2030s, but either way soon they will start mass producing 200 IQ+ people and we all become fucking obsolete

[Anonymous No.13562644]

Return to Christianity among the youth. Increasing divide between traditional peasant class immigrants and the global capitalists trucking them in. Sharp shift leftwards of political discourse. All these are not incompatible.

[Anonymous No.13562669]

statist left-occult ecofascist cosmic consciousness perspectival multinaturalism

transhumanist crispr future neural lace LOL what a meme. The real question is, while promissory materialist positivism fails yet another generation of mortals for whom the crypto-christian eschaton (Musk-Bezos Bogdanoff, singularity, or technojesus of your choice) will continue to remain just around the corner, where will millennial and gen-z stemlords turn for solace?

[Anonymous No.13562690]

>>13562630
>they will start mass producing 200 IQ+ people
As much as i would like that, that's not going to happen. If it were it would be much longer than "soon". Very little research is going into improving our own intelligence. We're all too focused on disease, space, and humanitarian issues, which is stupid, if we made ourselves smarter first, we'd be able to come up with solutions to the other problems sooner.

[Anonymous No.13562747]

To anticipate defining philosophical trends is to follow the most important problems of human action in the present. Process-relational thought is very promising, as it allows for the clarification of the problems of the present, which are ecological both in the environmental and most general senses, including epistemological. Singularitarianism and capitalist futurologies have been fully exposed as the sham ideologies they are, as tech corporations have been revealed to be just as nihilistic and exploitative as any other.

[Anonymous No.13562785]

>>13558680
patheme-matheme assemblages

[Anonymous No.13562808]

I hope to god sincerity comes back

[Anonymous No.13562818]

>>13562808
It's already on the way.

[Anonymous No.13562845]

>>13558055
climate change is going to get real and we’re going to play the blame game while we die because the answer to our problems is antithetical to our beliefs

[Anonymous No.13562848]

>>13562808
yeah, hopefully it doesn't end like last time...with a hanging :^)

[Anonymous No.13562866]

>>13562808
>>13562818
>>13562848
I'm actually really excited to see us move past our post-irony phase. It's been annoying, sure, but a lot of really good development of new kinds of humor came out of it, and I think there's a lot of potential in applying those techniques to honest, genuine humor and culture

[Anonymous No.13563170]

accelerationism and then big surprise capitalism is still not collapsing

[Anonymous No.13563197]

>>13563170
I don't think you know what accelerationism is

[Anonymous No.13563209]

>>13562644
>Return to Christianity among the youth
as much as i would like it this is wishful thinking
only kind of christians kids these days could become is the type which claims to love jesus, but doesnt care about any rules or teachings of the church
>Sharp shift leftwards of political discourse
wrong, the political discourse will redefine into making radical left the centre

[Anonymous No.13563218]

>>13558798
contemporary islam is trending away from mysticism into legalism

[Anonymous No.13563241]

>>13563170
>big surprise capitalism is still not collapsing
Until we have profitable space travel capitalism is collapsing

[Anonymous No.13563286]

>>13558700
>post-post-irony
you mean this isn't post-post-post irony?

[Anonymous No.13563312]

What is the defining philosophical trend of the 2010's? Because that's what will define the 2020's. Culture has been plateauing since the 90's with the only great change being the growth of the internet. Think of the shift in culture from the 50's to the 70's. Now think about the 00's to where we are now. Has the change in the latter been even a modicum as prominent as the former? I'm talking about all things: thought, literature, cinema, music, technology, fashion.

[Anonymous No.13563322]

>>13563312
Post-irony, anti-traditionalism, and personal subjectivity

[Anonymous No.13563355]

>>13562458
Fap fap fap fap fap

[Anonymous No.13563364]

>>13558700
>Instead, a return to sincerely and simply engaging with the material reality of daily life
This process has already started.

[Anonymous No.13563366]

>>13563322
>anti-traditionalism

[Anonymous No.13563367]

The acontextualization of social norms, mores, movements, and institutions.

[Anonymous No.13563370]

>>13563241
Wrong. "profitiable space travel" is tantamount to post-scarcity (and necessarily so)

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13563373]

>>13563312
I was thinking the same thing 20 years ago. It really is stale refried beans. The nation has been on the slide since the 1970s “stagflation” energy crisis. The empire is slipping out of our hands, but it seems they don’t know it or they’re going to go down swinging at everybody.

[Anonymous No.13563387]

>>13563312
>the only great change being the growth of the internet
that's a pretty major change to absorb
everybody use to to be somewhat on the same page, but now we're splintered even more

[Anonymous No.13563398]

Neo-Romanticism

[Anonymous No.13563403]

>>13563322
>Post-irony
I still don't understand what post-irony is supposed to be. There's irony where you do something that runs opposite of your true thoughts/intentions, and then there's sincerity running opposite of irony. Wouldn't post-irony just be surreal sincerity? The way I've seen the term post-irony used is in a sense where one person says or does something that looks like ironic but in fact isn't. In other words, someone says or does something exaggerated, extreme, or nonsensical without trying to subvert anything.

[Anonymous No.13563412]

>>13563322
this post but ironically

[Anonymous No.13563418]

>>13558055
Xi Jinping Thought

[Anonymous No.13563500]

>>13563373
Leftism is over sweetheart, you’re the old guys, just look in the mirror

[Anonymous No.13563563]

>>13563322
that is just continuing the trends of the 10's. I think the post would be better if it said what would be the next major philosophical trend, or rather when does anti-traditionalism eventually turn to traditionalism, and subjectivity into objectivety; when will enatiodromida kick in? A decade is too short a time for the gradual change we have been seeing now, but it could be accelerated with a catalyst of some sort.

[Anonymous No.13563578]

>>13561215
>Nick is green like the "green lion" used to refer to the sun as a technical neologism within alchemy
>Nick was into occultism and British occultism in particular, so he probably knew that symbol
Bravo image maker

[Anonymous No.13563639]

>>13561156
Is this lit, just making fancy words up, to make yourself feel better??

[Anonymous No.13563749]

>>13563563
>that is just continuing the trends of the 10's
Read the post I was responding to

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13563794]

>>13563500
You keep telling yourself that. Steady those knees, champ

[Anonymous No.13563800]

>>13563788
>if I say it first it can’t be said to me!
I feel like this is the philosophy of most of your posts

[Anonymous No.13563806]

>>13563373
the solution is to go further to the right

[Anonymous No.13563809]

>>13563794
Butterfly you are a female autistic. You never earn your smug images with your posts, you just attach them to be the value of the post themselves, like how redditors post pepe to attempt to substantiate their posts. There’s something you’re fundamentally missing from being a genuine person.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13563842]

>>13563806
The “right” is a reactionary direction aimed at going back in time to repeat something that’s done and gone. If you pay any attention to history you’d know this never happens. The future has to be something new, something that can work for us all
For instance, look at the popped balloon of the “alt-right” now some are trying to kickstart nazbol or this eco-fascism thing. Its just retarded skins of the dynamic leftism. We all want out of the grip of the liberal capitalists, its just you buys want to keep capitalism, bring back gods and emperors and it’s just not going to work.
Please. Read Stirner.

[Anonymous No.13563853]

>>13563842
>The future has to be something new, something that can work for us all
like salafism and orthodox judaism which are the rising societal trends currently
dont assume that progress always goes towards the direction youd like it to go

[Anonymous No.13563860]

>>13563853
and neoreaction/accelerationism

[Anonymous No.13563873]

>>13563853
read zizek

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13563877]

>>13563853
Yes, in a world of freedom (if we can get it in time) will allow the freedom to worship. But also the freedom to not worship, and those who don’t will likely flourish better. Who knows though.

[Anonymous No.13563878]

>>13563860
Nick Land has yet to be refuted by leftist academics

[Anonymous No.13563884]

>>13563878
He fucked it by zapping himself with research chemicals and cozying up with the proto-kinda-maybe-alt-right, which is enough for most of academia to justify writing him off entirely

[Anonymous No.13563891]

>>13563878
its not clear what "refuting" nick land would even look like. most academics probably just think hes a freak anyway. he has no real credibility. that being said his friend mark fisher had some conclusive things to say about him

[Anonymous No.13563899]

Anti-clout, anti-materialism, pro-rational and pro-individuualism is bound to return or at least that our the themes I work with with my current artistic endeavors that I feel are contrary to the current movements

[Anonymous No.13563933]

>>13563891
>its not clear what "refuting" nick land would even look like
primitivism?

[Anonymous No.13563955]

>>13562808
I sincerely hope God comes back.

[Anonymous No.13564327]

More strains of unstable and experimental LGBT Mandatory Islamic Consumerism escape from the underground laboratories of Neoliberal Managerialism.

Rise of an explicitly anti-academia leftism as more and more people on the far left realize that their bargain with various social institutions is faustian. Tacit acknowledgement of Moldbug's cathedral in that efforts toward leftist goals that take place within the confines of academia are only ever captured and rerouted into ever more liberalism.

Nick Land loses his monopoly on reactionary futurism as the notion that western civ is no longer worth saving, that it is so deeply compromised that efforts to save it merely help the enemy, increasingly permeates the far-right, and the desire to build a successor culture takes hold. See popularity of Nick Land, Bronze Age Pervert, David Myatt/O9A, and Ted Kaczynski, Evola and Spengler. All in someway theorise a passing out of our current civilisation and in to another yet the idea of somehow "saving" the west remains default among the far-right.

The refinement of psychometric profiling algorithms combined with gamerfication of mundane tasks to create a kind of "life on rails" where your Amazon account will know what actions, tasks, conversation topics with friends, food to eat, movies to see, shows to watch, will make you happiest. All you have to do is follow the prompts. Maybe not the next decade, but a move toward such a system now doubt.

[Anonymous No.13564651]

dont know if anyone will read the ramblings of a man who has been drinking but here we go

I am completely bought into this idea that the world is going to shit. I have three young kids who are going to grow up in this world.

To me the most important thing philosophically is the idea of soul and beyond this life. If we can accept that this life is flawed and intentionally full of suffering, like the jews, christians, greeks, romans, egyptians, persians, etc believed, then we can evade the doom mindset of everything is going to hell and this is our only chance at finding joy and it doesn't matter how well read you are and how many stories you have enjoyed when the planet is fried by the ever growing sun.

end rant

[Anonymous No.13564652]

>>13563312
Nostalgia for the 20th century. Just look at some of the musical trends like vaporwave

[Anonymous No.13564805]

>>13563412
underrated and "i was gonna post that" pilled

[Anonymous No.13565322]

>>13563842
You are a fucking moron. History is not a linear scale, upon which two parties, the left and right, have waged war. It is a bit more complex than this ultimately vague tug-of-war notion you seem to be giving out in your posting.

If you think the Republican party in America is about going 'backwards in time' you've got to be kidding me.

I neither think that the Democratic Party is completely about Progressivism or trying 'new things'. Your retarded take on politics threatens to throw us all into fifth grade social sciences if we don't watch ourselves. Watch as the LITERAL representation of you, Bernie Sanders and more specifically Elizabeth Warren, are specifically shunned by the rest of the party in favor of more down-to-earth measures.

You are an absolute moron, and a laughing stock of anyone who actually cares about politics, let alone political philosophy. :3

[Anonymous No.13565652]

>>13558055
Ethno-nationalism, the works of Julius Evola, and of course Trans-humanism. With a dash of Homofash.

[Anonymous No.13566195]

>>13558055

yeeting

[Anonymous No.13566230]

>>13558055
pro-cunnyism, anti-pedophobic

[Anonymous No.13566834]

>>13563884
I keep seeing you people post about how he used drugs in the past, but I've never seen a single source to confirm it so I'm just going to assume you're making shit up.

[Anonymous No.13566885]

I think transhumanism and weirder body modification is going to be more and more of a thing. Many humans are going to stop looking like humans.

[Anonymous No.13566887]

>>13564327
namefag so I can track your posts.

[Anonymous No.13566891]

>>13558055
Antisemitism hopefully lol

[Anonymous No.13567061]

>>13566891
Lmfao only good answer in the thread

[Anonymous No.13567073]

>>13558055
I think there's potential for a pretty big religious revival imo. Especially I think most leftists by the year 2030 will bite the bullet and basicallly become either libertarians or full on communitarian Catholics. But that's more a political prediction than anything else

I think on the ball philosophers are going to step away from either rigid scientism or ascientific historicism since both have run their course. They're going to start interrogating the bases of enlightenment science and come to some radically new understanding of the scientific project, informed in large part by a rejection of Baconionism. This will either mean a lapse into a sort of monism/spinozism, or something genuinely new, tho it's impossible to say what

Less and less philosophy will be done in the academy, more and more will be done through loose collectives outside the university.

Neo-cartesianism, port royal des champs arrives from the future, revival of Jansenism and Calvinism in response to climate crises.

Philosophy will still revolve around questioning the enlightenment, but this will be done in a more sophisticated way than it was by 20th century thinkers, who just said that the enlightenment didn't live up to its goals but they still more or less assumed its first principles.

There will be a Heidegger but for patristics rather than for the presocratics.

Charles Sanders Peirce will continue to grow in significance, attracting both followers and detractors.

Idk, maybe a cognitive turn in the same way we had a linguistic turn (1900s) and a historical turn (1800s)

[Anonymous No.13567078]

Romantic anti authority (of any kind, left or right) spiritualism

[Anonymous No.13567088]

>>13563842
>Whig history

[Anonymous No.13567089]

>>13566891
Genetics doesn't make you prone to world domination

[Anonymous No.13567098]

>>13566834
the source is his own recollection in the book he wrote himself

[Anonymous No.13567137]

>breathes in

Anti-technological terrorism as right-wing performance art, with newspapers and underground zines dedicated, first, to the satirical emulation of academic gobbledegook as a response to these attacks, while later considering them as a serious counter-cultural art form with different schools of thought each offering different discursive methods through which to explain the artist's rationale.

[Anonymous No.13567211]

Clairoist-Snailism

[Anonymous No.13567245]

>>13567211
>implying I wasn't at p4k when everyone in the crowd was asking if those were real tattoos on claire's forearms or not and then lindsay came out and they kissed and I excused myself limbing my way through the crowd to inhale vape carts in the baño and jerk a nut out

[Anonymous No.13567337]

>>13558107
This, but without catholicism

[Anonymous No.13567370]

>>13566230

> LARPing a pedo to own the libs.

[Anonymous No.13567445]

>>13558055
Endless critiques of neoliberalism that will be recuperated by neoliberalism itself - ie all new political "forms" (Trump, gilets jaunes and so on) and things like Houellebecq's et al. Also stuff with a "return to nature" and an ecological theme, but with a neoliberal garnish. Something like Walden but with an emphasis on the idea of adaptation to the new socio/political/climatic environment

Probably not about AI or anything like that. It's just nerd and wannabe internet hipster's masturbation material

[Anonymous No.13567552]

Literally just more "white man bad" neoliberalism

[Anonymous No.13568478]

>>13558055
God I wish that were me.

[Anonymous No.13568528]

>>13558798
imagine the smell...

[Anonymous No.13569051]

>>13567552
No one actually thinks that. You just want to feel like the victim

[Anonymous No.13569256]

>>13568528
She probably smells like Argan oil or Frankincense

[Anonymous No.13570303]

Bump

[Anonymous No.13570312]

>>13558055
This one for sure.

[Anonymous No.13570327]

>>13570312
The guy sure was ahead of his time, I can tell you that.

[Anonymous No.13570340]

>>13558407
Damn dude, you’re retarded.

[Anonymous No.13570399]

>>13558700
David Foster Wallace already tried to do Neo-sincerity in the 90s and it never caught on.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13570405]

>>13567552
Neoliberalism is white man rich and savior of the human race with wonderful capitalism. Some of them are under the impression capitalism can spread to the whole world and make them all rich too. Left neoliberalism is just as horrendous as right neoliberalism/neoconservativism.
The whole sjw versus alt-right thing is just another distraction

[Anonymous No.13570419]

>>13558055
AI ethics. The exploration and mapping of consciousness. Ethical Eugenics. The implications of the internet age. Globalisation and interconnectivity.

[Anonymous No.13570428]

>>13562669
Imagine using words this big while saying this little.

[Anonymous No.13570430]

>>13558055
globo-homo and multikult on steroids.

[Anonymous No.13570435]

>>13562690
China is literally working on the genetic components of intelligence and ethical eugenics right now. Watch the evolution of us on Netflix.

[Anonymous No.13570438]

>>13559950
>>13558779
Her this hoes music in Chipotle in Jew York the other day. Had me a hearty chuckle.

[Anonymous No.13570444]

Total ignorance, I provide as evidence the last 100 years

[Anonymous No.13570445]

>>13561209
To be fair it's necessary to distinguish liberal-conservative """""nationalism""""" i.e. selling out one's country to the world economic order and revitalised nationalism that exists in many different strains today and rejects the former more than anyone else. The former also seamlessly shifts between ethnic and civic at the convenience of said sellouts.

[Anonymous No.13570448]

>>13558791
She's 20.

[Anonymous No.13570451]

>>13569051
Bullshit.

[Anonymous No.13570456]

>>13558055
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY COMMUNISM

[Anonymous No.13570464]

>>13570456
Unironically this.

[Anonymous No.13570501]

>>13570435
>watch netflix propaganda
never

[Anonymous No.13570505]

>>13561188
powerful

[Anonymous No.13570521]

>>13570501
It's not propaganda. Take off the tin foil hat for a few minutes bruh.

[Anonymous No.13570523]

catholic acceleration

[Anonymous No.13570530]

>>13570521
I don't think the laws of reality would allow for a netflix documentary about Chinese eugenics to not be propaganda.

[Anonymous No.13570542]

>>13570521
Did you know that the army demanded that a planned scene where Robert Deniro's character was shown to have torture manuals be removed from Meet the Fockers?

[Anonymous No.13570603]

>>13570542
>torture manuals
honestly how complicated can it be

[Anonymous No.13570622]

>>13558055
I think metaphysics will regain favor as consumers will start realistically believing in the fictional realities they consume.
An informal philosophy will emerge where Harry Potter's reality exists somewhere "out there", along with the Star Wars universe, Marvel, etc.
Pop Culture will morph into a type of new age religion; corporations will make a lot of money from this. Purveyors of pop culture will be the new high priests and "commune", producing sacred works of regarding these worlds.
The soi will flow with the tears of millions of soulless losers.

[Anonymous No.13570659]

>>13561156
Pretentious Pedantism

[Anonymous No.13570714]

>>13570622
Does this mean the next religious extremists will bomb buildings dressed up as Ironman?

[Anonymous No.13570731]

>>13570714
We're already there m8.

[Anonymous No.13570778]

>National populism
>State capitalism
Both will lead to the end of the neoliberal/neoconservative world order that has existed since the 1980s.
>Eurasianism
A Brussels-Moscow-Beijing axis will lead to a multipolar world.
>Splendid isolation
Lead by Britain, the Commonwealth realms will seal themselves off from the world. Bad things will happen to non-Anglo Celtic minorities.
>Hispanic acculturation
The dominant culture in the USA will be Spanish, Catholic and reactionary, Democrats will go back to being the right wing party.
>Accelerationism
A last gasp effort by communists and fascists alike to overturn modernity, resulting in the synthesis of both ideologies into distributism.
>Ecological spiritualism
With Christianity all but non existent in Northern Europe, ecology will combine with a resurgent pagan LARP to save the environment.

[Anonymous No.13570796]

>>13562458
Oh god my dick. I think I'll focus on internet pornography as the world is just moving towards more and more surveillance capitalism.

>>13570622
Also this desu.

[Anonymous No.13570878]

>>13570778
>>Accelerationism
>A last gasp effort by communists and fascists alike to overturn modernity

The precise opposite definition of acceleration

[Anonymous No.13570934]

>>13570878
No, it sounds fairly apt.
It's a Hail Mary play when the masses don't buy into your ideology. You try to burn the buildings down in hopes of a collapse, fight over the ashes, and then gambling again that you'll somehow turn out the winner.

I'm sure there's some high-falutin Landian semantics over what "acceleration" really means but in a nutshell, it's wishful thinking.
Complete bottom feeder tier of neoractionary responses. Like flipping the board when you're losing a game.

[Anonymous No.13570973]

>>13570934
>You try to burn the buildings down in hopes of a collapse, fight over the ashes,
Again this isn't Accelerationism. You have bought in to a pejorative/misappropriation that arose during the trump election that conflated accelerationism with bane memes (crashing the plane with no survivors).

All accelerationism, actually accelerationism as theorized by Land and friends, is acknowledgement of capitalist production as the motor of modernity and the desire to see it continue unimpeded. It is a complete defence of the modernist project.

[Anonymous No.13571026]

>>13570973
>I'm sure there's some high-falutin Landian semantics over what "acceleration" really means but in a nutshell, it's wishful thinking.
>All accelerationism, actually accelerationism as theorized by Land and friends
Like I said.
Land didn't invent "accelerationism". He co-opted the term and applied his own paint to it, making this a dull semantic argument. It's virtually indistinguishable from traditional accelerationism except to ideologues who always apply their moralistic nuance why their brand is acceptable (marxists, fascists, techno-anarchists, whatever).

All the neoractionary movements are a joke.

[Anonymous No.13571031]

>>13558055

It will be a lot less politically correct; we will be facing more urgent issues, real or imaginary, and won't have the time to worry about equity. Probably there will be a strong back-and-forth argument about automation and transhumanism. The propaganda will calm down a little bit, but mostly because the average man is becoming immune to the sickness. I'm assuming, given the kind of memes that are popular now on social media, there will be a minor absurdist movement that will die off fairly quickly.

[Anonymous No.13571081]

>>13562239
Same desu

[Anonymous No.13571301]

>>13571026
You want to ground it in semantics because you don't wish to acknowledge your own sloppy use of this terminology. If you can frame everything as semantics you can dismiss and never have to actually engage.

Acceleration is rooted in the work of Land and the CCRU and the fact that you would bring up moralizing is perplexing considering accelertionism in all varieties except the vulgar misappropriation of the term you initially used are diagnostic not prescriptive and completly distinct from neoreaction, of which the majority of accelerationist factions would share you opnion on it being a joke.