[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 184x234, 1558849312493.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13535682 No.13535682[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

*ahem*
human evolution as posited by modern science is not real

>> No.13535829

>>13535682
Used to be a big proponent of evolution, not anymore, I don't buy it. Not even a hard science.

>> No.13535834

>>13535829
I bet you have a child's understanding of biology

>> No.13535839

>>13535834
Used to say the same thing to my opponents. Lots of bio-jargon and pseudo-evidence can't save a failing theory that isn't observable or empirical.

>> No.13535844
File: 42 KB, 311x475, A0463893-D729-43F2-94DA-B37F15F259F3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13535844

>>13535829
There are many working parts to it and it can’t be unproven now. Only little parts of it are adjusted, added or subtracted. Its a fact of life.

>> No.13535846

>>13535834
Kek

>> No.13535852

>>13535839
Take a course in evolutionary biology at a community college or at one of those online universities, then come back

>> No.13535853

>>13535834
Evolution is unfalsifiable, biggest scam in history.

>> No.13535877

>>13535853
Just because you feel shafted doesn’t mean it’s false.

>> No.13535888

>>13535682
where does he say that? I've read a couple of his books but he never said anything like it

>> No.13535926

>>13535852
>NPC #1445 your indoctrination is not complete, return to your education factory for proper programming!
>SIR, YES SIR!
Been there done that, waste of money.

>> No.13535933

>>13535888
He probably disbelieved in evolution since it's not real science and it relies on retarded metaphysics. Schuon was Guenon's friend and he talked about evolution very negatively.

http://www.frithjof-schuon.com/evolution-engl.htm

>> No.13535934

>>13535926
It's easy to pretend you're not a brainlet when you dismiss all your opponents as brainwashed, at least if the appearance of knowledge is more important to you than actual knowledge

>> No.13535938
File: 9 KB, 220x230, images (9).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13535938

>>13535926
>being smart is indoctrination

>> No.13535957

>>13535829
>>13535839
>>13535853
what do you suggest in opposition?

>> No.13535960

>>13535682
Ah I see so the FACT that actual evolution of life has been observed (even if it was on the microscopic level) is just something you'll conveniently ignore, right?

>> No.13535961

>>13535839
Okay, you've piqued my interest. Why is evolution bullshit?

>> No.13535964

>>13535957
Noah’s ark

>> No.13535976

>>13535938
good portrait of you.
>>13535934
>It's easy to pretend you're not a brainlet when you dismiss all your opponents as brainwashed,
So stop dismissing your opponents with "hurrr go back to school" nonsense.

>> No.13536003

>>13535829
Okay. Elaborate, please. Free me from these coils.

>> No.13536031

>>13535957
intelligent design

>> No.13536036

The Admins of our simulation (often known as "God" by primitive cultures) used evolution as an algorithm to develop complex life.

>> No.13536045

>>13536031
And what do you think breathes life into this supposition?

>> No.13536060

>>13536045
we are embodied information, and information is not self created

>> No.13536078

>>13536003
>>13535957

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU_QXhKgp8Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S89IskZI740

>> No.13536082

>>13536060
What created your designer? Of course it’s all self created. Life happens under the right conditions. It comes, it goes. You experience it only through your short little life and presume boundaries and superhumans in the sky who promise you you won’t actually die *die*

Again I tell you. When this impermanence occurs to a human being, they wont jump off a building. They wont go to war, they wont blow themselves up for any cause. Fuck your neoliberal pie chart

>> No.13536084

>>13536078
What does he have to say? You cannot refute it. It is fact now >>13535844

>> No.13536200

>>13535829
>>13535839
>>13535853
Two ways to disprove common descent:
Find a bunny fossil with a dinosaur fossil
More precise:
Finding transitional forms in the wrong spot.
Suppose there are two species, A and B, with B having recently evolved (on the fossil record scale) from A. This implies fossils of A and B would have a set of traits in common, C1, which is so large as to make them considered morphologically similar, and a set of traits they do not share, D1, as to distinguish them.
For common descent to be true, there must have been a transitional species T that existed before B and after A that evolved from the latter and into the forme. T will have all traits C1 in common with A and B but also additional traits in common with B. Call the traits in common with B and T C2. T will also have differences from B to distinguish them that A also didn't share, D2, but less than A had with B. Therefore C1 is a subset of C2 and D2 is a subset of D1.
Fossils of T will therefore be below fossils of B but above fossils of A.
Therefore if you find fossils matching the description of A and B but find a fossil matching T below both, for example, you have falsified common descent, as it wouldn't make sense for a species to lose traits in evolving to A only to quickly gain them *all* back in evolving to B.
Also to add, the transitional of traits will be done via simple modifications to A's morphology to be more similar to B's, such as the fusion of two bones.
Every transitional fossil we discovered in the exactly correct fossil layer was a falsifiable prediction that got verified.

>> No.13536208
File: 156 KB, 474x462, 1563412671926.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13536208

>>13535829
t. never seen a dog

>> No.13536218

>thinks his great grandfather was a fish
Absolute state of evolutionists

>> No.13536236

>thinks his great grandfather was dust
The absolute state of Christcucks

>> No.13536249

>>13536082
The designer is supernatural therefore he is uncreated while we are natural therefore we are created.

>> No.13536252

>>13536236
Technically atheists also believe humans were once dust.

>> No.13536430

>H. P. Blavatsky, René Guénon and Julius Evola all shared the belief in the Hyperborean, polar origins of Mankind and a subsequent solidification and devolution.[43]

>Rene Guenon in his book The Lord of the World says: Almost every tradition has its name for this mountain, such as the Hindu Meru, the Persian Alborj, and the Montsalvat of Western Grail legend. There is also the Arab mountain Qaf and the Greek Olympus, which has in many ways the same significance. This consists of a region that, like the Terrestrial Paradise, has become inaccessible to ordinary humanity, and that is beyond the reach of those cataclysms which upset the human world at the end of certain cyclic periods. This region is the authentic ‘supreme country’ which, according to certain Vedic and Avestan texts, was originally sited towards the North Pole, even in the literal sense of the word. Although it may change its localisation according to the different phases of human history, it still remains polar in a symbolic sense because essentially it represents the fixed axis around which everything revolves.

>> No.13536445

>>13536252
Christians must have a terrible time comprehending how a tree trunk can turn into a chair.

>> No.13536449

>>13536249
But this is Opposite Day, so no.

>> No.13536453

>>13536445
>They’re gifts from god!

>> No.13536454
File: 20 KB, 320x240, 1562902231183.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13536454

>>13535682
gotta post a warning sign
>>>/sci/10840201

>> No.13536455

>>13535976
dropout that doesn't trust (understand) academia responds with no u. And you are part of the "unindoctrinated" intellectual elite, here at /lit/, right ?

>> No.13536462
File: 203 KB, 1948x502, Darwinists be like.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13536462

>evolutioncucks still exist
lmao

>> No.13536466
File: 1.52 MB, 498x280, 1563791561831.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13536466

>>13536453
here's a gif from god

>> No.13536507

>>13535976
>rebuttal amounts to "no u"
truly, an intellectual giant and not at all a soulless NPC

>> No.13536520

>>13535829
why do so many people take such obvious bait

>> No.13536588

>>13536520
Well, as /pol/tards keep spreading we keep finding people that are actually that stupid and not just memeing, so it gets harder to know for sure. That post is way too funny though, so you are probably right, but some of them are really like that.

>> No.13536605

>>13535829
Same, macro evolution is a joke.

>> No.13536614 [DELETED] 

>>13536200
How does this disprove common descent?
It may just disprove some cases but not the general theory

>> No.13536617

>>13536445
Yea it's made by a creative hand

>> No.13536908

>>13535682
Evolution is racist, in fact. No self-respecting leftist can accept such a naturalistic, essentialist explanation for the DIVERSITY of life.

>> No.13536930

>>13536908
>Evolution is racist,
That implies evolution (a non-entity) has a racial bias instead of just being nature favoring the strong, bold, and more adaptable.

>> No.13536936

>>13535957

Forms, Aeons, Archons, superpositional hypostases thereof.

>> No.13536950

>>13535844
>Time = Magic
yay gradualism!

>> No.13537152

>>13535682

At least you didn't put a lot of time and effort into your trolling.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIEoO5KdPvg

>> No.13537428

>>13535844
So why aren't gorillas on facebook?
Why aren't wolves manning the Dog Chow factories?

>> No.13537490

>>13535682
There is a growing group of scientists from several disciplines saying that it doesn’t hold water. For example Yaneer Bar-Yam, a physicist, disproved (as in it’s not possible) Dawkins’ gene selection theory.
Here’s a video of three other non-quack skeptics giving very compelling arguments against Darwinism and the current consensus.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=noj4phMT9OE