[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 47 KB, 310x517, 1984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1353491 No.1353491 [Reply] [Original]

1. 1984
2. To Kill a Mockingbird
3. Crime and Punishment
4. The Great Gatsby
5. The Lord of the Rings
6. The Sun Also Rises
7. The Brothers Karamazov
8. Catch-22
9. Harry Potter Series
10. The Chronicles of Narnia
11. The Twilight Saga
12. Fahrenheit 451
13. The Hitchhiker's Guide
14. The Da Vinci Code
15. The Old Man and the Sea
16. Brave New World
17. Atlas Shrugger
18. The Lord of the Flies
19. The Grapes of Wrath
20. Atonement
.
.
9000. The Catcher in the Rye
9001. Ulysses
9002. Pride and Prejudice
9003. Lolita
9004. Great Expectations
9005. Les Miserables
9006. The Fountainhead
9007. Dracula
9008. Jane Eyre
9009. To the Lighthouse
9010. Brisingr

>> No.1353494

>>1353491

> 14. The Da Vinci Code

and you were doing so well

>> No.1353497

0/10

>> No.1353500

I actually have more of a problem with Catch-22 than any of your trolling entries.

>> No.1353501

7/10
I believed you for a second

>> No.1353518

Troll post

no Count of Monte Cristo

>> No.1353520

Some people didn't read the the words 'pwer rankings'. The lower the worse, obviously. Still, his list is messed up, because 1984 isn't the worst novel of all time, but most of his low rankings are pretty accurate.

>> No.1353536

1984 confirmed for greatest book ever written.

>> No.1353544

>>1353520
>Some people didn't read the the words 'pwer rankings'. The lower the worse, obviously. Still, his list is messed up, because 1984 isn't the worst novel of all time, but most of his low rankings are pretty accurate.

Power Rankings mean no. 1 > 9000
also 0/10

>> No.1353549

>>1353491
Fairly accurate

someone archive this or sticky

>> No.1353556

>>1353494
You react to "14. The Da Vinci Code" but not to "11. Twilight"? What is wrong with you?

>> No.1353561

Harry Potter series needs to be higher

>> No.1353571

>>1353556
>implying Da Vinci Code is better than Twilight

>> No.1353573

I'm so happy there are other TSAR fans here!

But yeah, I lost all respect once twilight popped up at 11.

And I also firmly believe that all Steinbeck books are a
waste of time. Although apparently the Nobel Prize
committee disagrees...

>> No.1353579

Harry Potter series should be number 2.
Under The Count of Monte Cristo.

>> No.1353581

>>1353556

> implying Dan Brown is not the worst author ever

>> No.1353606

>>1353581
Have you ever read Paulo Coelho?

>> No.1353609

>>1353581
>He's never read pynchon
>Lucky bastard

>> No.1353616

>>1353606
Coelho at least has the decency to keep his books short.

>>1353609
A lucky bitch, if anything.

>> No.1353626

>1. 1984

0/10

>> No.1353680

>9000. The Catcher in the Rye
9001. Ulysses
9002. Pride and Prejudice
9003. Lolita
9004. Great Expectations
9005. Les Miserables
9006. The Fountainhead
9007. Dracula
9008. Jane Eyre
9009. To the Lighthouse
9010. Brisingr

>implying these are not the worst novels of all time

>> No.1353696
File: 3 KB, 103x126, 1283700512432s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1353696

>The Twilight Saga

>> No.1353698
File: 41 KB, 387x417, 0ad2560b-dbb7-450a-a037-bef7051c82cb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1353698

<- Sums up the whole thread.Also,

>Atlas Shrugger