/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13530205]

What am in for?

[Anonymous No.13530236]

>>13530205
A tedious, poorly-reasoned slog which consistently confuses database building for argument.

[Anonymous No.13530272]

>>13530205
>What am in for?
Regret, wasted time, and with some luck a new understanding of how naive you can be. Never let yourself be memed again.

[Anonymous No.13530278]

>>13530272
Elaborate

[Anonymous No.13530291]

>>13530278
No

[Anonymous No.13530296]

>>13530291
Do it!

[Anonymous No.13530297]

>>13530278
>>13530291
Just read it. It's only 500pgs or so. Basically jews are icky and msm is bleh and a lot of "data" with dubious conclusions. I'm an antisemite and didn't like it.

[Anonymous No.13530301]

>>13530297
Thanks

[Anonymous No.13530309]

>>13530297
It's not 'jews are icky' at all. He just talks about Jewish involvement in 20th century movements like the Frankfurt School and Neocons and whatever. He thinks jews are genetically prone to being more tribal than most other people, especially anglos and whoever, so there ends up being a lot of nepotism and jewish takeover of institutions, which they then use to further aims that help them, sometimes at the cost of the majority population.

It's not a very rigorous sort of thing but nobody in all of the social sciences has a leg to stand on when asking for scientific rigor.

[Anonymous No.13530431]

>>13530309
>He thinks jews are genetically prone to being more tribal than most other people
Based Jews. I wish we Bulgarians could be as tribal.

[Anonymous No.13530447]

The truth desu.

[Anonymous No.13530503]

>>13530236
>a fastidious collection of data points that defy reasonable assumption of coincidence

[Anonymous No.13530514]

>>13530205
Just read this instead

[Anonymous No.13530543]

>>13530205
>What am in for?
He gets to Boas pretty quickly, as an introduction to the gang mentality that Jews tend to follow. Afterwards he shows the lack of scientific rigor in Psychoanalysis and follows this through The Frankfurt School - and into the movements related to these institutions. It is well footnoted but, unless you are in for a slog, I recommend that you just rip through it, making brief notes on anything that you think is bullshit. Reference the footnotes on these points and validate his references (many of which are not readily contestable because they are Jewish). Afterwards give it a second spin and you should have the hang of it.

[Anonymous No.13530545]

>>13530205
>he fell for the meme

[Anonymous No.13530548]

>>13530431
I think the Jews are incredibly based as well, I really admire them, and this isn't a dishonest opinion, I really think they are as Nietzsche said 'the most fateful people who ever existed'. So much of history has been just the machinations of the Jews, they are beautiful in their concordance of person and domination, and I do think they have a relation to God, though I obviously don't think it's the true, uncluttered one, but that relation is reserved for the few. I prefer Christians to Jews in most senses, but there are ways in which Jews are superior even in that relation.

But I'm not Jewish and don't want to be, and if they're going to fuck with me and mine, well then we're enemies by definition. Yeah you can turn the cheek, that will save your soul, but it won't save your country.

I've known a lot of Jews and most of them are just normal people, but honestly they do have a kind of tribal streak, and a sociopathy towards people outside their clan. I don't begrudge them their nature, but that doesn't entail submission to their designs.

The pure mystic has to release himself from these considerations, but most of us live in this world mostly, and in this world there is no reason not to respond to aggression with aggression.

also Bulgarians are fairly tribal when compared to a race like the Anglos, who are just ridiculously exogamous and individualistic.

[Anonymous No.13530626]

>>13530545
Not an argument.