/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13510176]

I have a bit of a negative view of China. I haven't really spent time trying to understand China, so this is a view shaped by western forces. I'm wondering what sort of propaganda China has aimed outwards? So what sort of view do those people have in our direction?
Or any similar examples from other powerful countries?

[Anonymous No.13510196]

They see the US as economic rivals if that's what you're talking about. Relations have never been very good desu

[Anonymous No.13510226]

>>13510196
Yes, in modern times, what are the ideas that their citizens get exposed to, that shape their view from there about us?

[Anonymous No.13510235]

>>13510176
Read On China and World Order by Kissinger.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13510258]

>>13510226
Very little form what I’ve gathered. They have their own closed intranet and have been very censorious. Not sure about nowadays. Maybe a little thawing. They’re certainly getting weird western looking bourgeois types now.

>>13510235
Fuck that sociopathic murderer

[Anonymous No.13510276]

>>13510258
Why do you post in every thread, even in topics you clearly have no clue about?

[Anonymous No.13510280]

>>13510258
>hurr I won't read something out of the literal horse's mouth cuz he hurt my feefees

[Anonymous No.13510285]

>>13510176
It’s complicated, but I would say that the U.S. and China’s relationship is close to Cold War era Soviet-US relations. They’re rivals, but economically they dramatically rely on the other (half of China’s reserve currency is USD, of course the US has its debts). Additionally, China greatly admires Western education, and every respectable figure studies out of country (maybe they also feel comfortable western colleges tend to be more accepting to left wing ideologies). As for why many western people (myself included) dislike China is because it’s culture and values are diametrically opposed to that of the west, and there power is only expanding their influence.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13510321]

>>13510276
I have a wide range of interests. What do you know of China?

>>13510280
I’d just rather not read a liberal’s perspective. No time for it. And he is a disgusting pile of shit.

[Anonymous No.13510352]

>>13510321
you have a wide range of diversions but don't seem to take a real interest in anything

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13510687]

Anyone read this one?

[Anonymous No.13510722]

>>13510176
>I'm wondering what sort of propaganda China has aimed outwards?
Pic related is a compilation of speeches and writings by big daddy Xi that pretty explicitly lays out China's general strategy for the next few decades. This is a very good introduction to Chinese policy as the Chinese see it.

>So what sort of view do those people have in our direction?
In my personal experience, the average chinese person have separate view of western people/culture and western government. Here the US's soft-power cannot be understated. American cultural exports like the NBA, tv/movies, fashion trends, etc have made huge impacts in giving the average chinese person a positive opinion on the west.

Views of western governments is a bit more complicated. There seems to be quite a bit of baggage held over from western exploitation back in the 1800's. "The Century of humiliation" is very much felt by a lot of people still. As such, western governments are generally viewed as malevolent in most cases.

>>13510235
>Read On China and World Order by Kissinger
Second this. This book gives an excellent survey on the US-China rapprochement from one of the main policy makers who constructed it.

[Anonymous No.13510758]

>>13510176
You'd better buckle up your seatbelts and start learning 汉语 you filthy 外国人.

[Anonymous No.13510776]

>>13510321
>I would rather not read the perspective of a person who is responsible for the position that China has in today's world because muh feelz
suit yourself mentalcuck. nobody said you had to praise Operation Condor when you were done reading him.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13510800]

>>13510776
Meh. I did read some of it at a library once, back in like 1997 or so. By then the old republican in me was fading to apathetic non-participant. Didn’t check it out

>>13510722
Good post, thanks.

[Anonymous No.13510815]

>>13510800
>Meh. I did read some of it at a library once, back in like 1997 or so. By then the old republican in me was fading to apathetic non-participant. Didn’t check it out
who the fuck gives a shit about your political opinions? I loathe the Nixon, Kissinger, the CIA, and American imperialism. That doesn't mean that I'm going to ignore what they have to say, especially when they have valuable things to say about world-changing events that *they did*.

You care more about the image you project than the substance of your thoughts. You are a cancer on this board.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13510846]

>>13510815
It was a way of explaining my take on it and why I’m not going to explore it from their perspective.
But go ahead make another cancerous post full of pointless hate.

[Anonymous No.13510941]

>>13510758
我會說中文

[Anonymous No.13510969]

>>13510176
China is our gracious overlords who will dismantle liberal capitalism for us

[Anonymous No.13510979]

>>13510846
>everyone who owns me in debates must be wrong for reasons

[Anonymous No.13511040]

>>13510321
>abloo bloo he's meanie!
literacy is wasted on you.

[Anonymous No.13511050]

>>13510176
>mistah schaub, your lip

[Anonymous No.13511374]

>>13510176
If you're up for finding out more, read R. Nisbett's The Geography of Thought.
I can only tell you what Russian news show, since my family watches it all the time.
So, when it comes to the Americans, they are always either 1) idiots; 2) evil plot creators; 3) pathological liars. Politically speaking. Russian news never really spoke much about American citizens. It's mostly politics on a high level, so Trump related news mostly, along with a couple of assassinations I don't remember much about.
The way they portray it is that Russia always "reacts" to the plots, lies, and propaganda of the US. Putin (he's on television way too often) always only "reacts", he is never the one who initiates anything anti-american. Americans are the bad ones because they try to conquer the world, but it won't happen since clever Russians can see through their plots. In addition to this, when questioned about any form of anti-american propaganda, Russian always respond with "well, they did it first, we have to react to it somehow, right?"
To reiterate, this is all political stuff. I don't know what Russians can possibly think of American citizens.

[Anonymous No.13511433]

>>13510846
>others are making the cancerous posts
Kys cunt. You get educated day in and day out by anons who simply can’t handle your cacauphonous stupidity and always have some reflective excuse to act like you were actually just pretending to be an idiot
Honestly, without any hatred, you are astoundingly unperceptive, it shows, and it’s not a good trait

[Anonymous No.13511456]

>>13510276
Dude. Don't respond. Do not tolerate.

[Anonymous No.13511463]

>>13510280
>>13510352
>>13510776
>>13511040
>>13510815
>>13510979
>>13511433
Please, please, please stop feeding the animal.

[Anonymous No.13511476]

>>13510258
>They have their own closed intranet
PLEASE stop talking, this just really hurts.
Even just repeating what the MSM says on this issue is far smarter and more accurate than what you put forward.

[Anonymous No.13511483]

>>13511476
>What is wechat and weibo?
the average chinese person doesn't need a fucking vpn because they don't care about non-chinese websites.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511491]

>>13511433
All I did was make a value judgement on an architect of genocide. A reasonable poster would just come in and say something like “yeah, he’s not a great person, I don’t agree with him I just suggest reading from his perspective” and everything would be fine.
But by “cancer” I believe we mean a series of obnoxious posts filled with digressions and declarations of anger. YOU are the cancer ITT.
SHUT UP

[Anonymous No.13511509]

>>13511483
He's autistic but not wrong. It's not intranet, it's just a very heavily censored internet.

[Anonymous No.13511511]

>>13511483
Yes, but that doesn't justify retardation tier tech Jargon.

[Anonymous No.13511530]

We've gone over this before. This is thread is a prime example of how you're warping the discourse. The fact that we can all know what you post in other threads taints everything you say. You are not a nameless voice, but a person with an ideology. The former lets us interact with the ideas themselves, whereas you introduce yourself as medium, changing the locus of the conversation, and shifting it's purpose away from abstract consideration to inter-personal amelioration. The worst part is, you don't even have to leave. You don't even have to get rid of your account. Just drop the trip. For our sake, and yours.

[Anonymous No.13511534]

>>13511491
That was my first post ITT; i was reading your convo and honestly the anger aimed at you reads as totally justifiable
So no, you are, as always, the cancer

[Anonymous No.13511540]

>>13510846
Let me get this straight. You’re not going to explore their perspective because your identity as an anarchist is too fragile to handle even contemplating a liberal/capitalist/imperialist viewpoint, even if it offers valuable insight into a subject you are curious about?

Yup. You are the self-aggrandizing and brand-obsessed cancer that is plaguing this board. Get fucked.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511542]

>we’ve been over this all before. We’re all special needs children and ...

You argue with the “ideas themselves” all the time.

[Anonymous No.13511546]

Are you making fun of retarded kids?

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511555]

>>13511534
>hates the cells that die of cancer, not the original cancer cells

>>13511540
Because I was raised in a family that saw nothing wrong with him. My mother loved Nixon even. I’ve been there, I read from this book, I have many others to read now. Kudos to anyone who wants to read it, I never judged anyone a creep for it. Get over it

[Anonymous No.13511564]

>>13511555
Wow, each time I think you’ve peaked in your density and self love but it just keeps coming

[Anonymous No.13511570]

>>13511540
FRAME THIS POST

[Anonymous No.13511576]

>>13511555
Who gives a shit about your fucking family you sense woman? It has literally NOTHING to do with the value of the book. Grow the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.13511586]

>>13511555
We are not really your traditional conservatives, Butterfly. Might want to try the winning team for once. :3

We probably wouldn’t like your parents either

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511595]

>>13511576
Cancer cell

>>13511570
The premise is all off of course

>>13511564
>self love is a bad thing
More cells. You’ve ruined the thread. But I guess you all didn’t care for it anyway

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511604]

>>13511586
You’re “altright” nationalists. My mothers was a conservative Christian. We didn’t like Nazis but there was an amount of racism in the house.
Kissinger is a neocon of course

[Anonymous No.13511625]

>>13511586
>>13511576
>>13511564
>>13511540
>>13511534
How do you fuckers not get this? Do not engage. Literally, every single one of us is here primarily because of a fucked up dopamine habit triggered by (you)s. If you want her to stop, stop giving her the fix.

[Anonymous No.13511664]

>>13511595
>self love is a good thing because some trite metaphor
Can you guess why bringing your narcissism to this place causes problems? Doubt it desu

[Anonymous No.13511667]

>>13511604
I am liberal as fuck and I absolutely despite your retarded self obsessed ass, so careful with that whole “all you haters are just alt right incels!”

[Anonymous No.13511687]

>>13511625
Is it possibly to OD and die from dopamine?

[Anonymous No.13511689]

>>13511664
>>13511667
Please see above:
>>13511625
>>13511463

[Anonymous No.13511696]

>>13511687
No, not like this anyway. It's also not just arbitrary dopamine, but dopamine in reward-center pathways.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13511921]

>>13511625
>>13511689
>>13511463
Stop feeding the cancer cells

[Anonymous No.13512085]

>>13510176
they think Americans are stupid and lazy, they at the same time love american pop culture. They love European consumer culture in the bourgeois areas.

[Anonymous No.13512113]

>>13512085
Do you think so many would go along with "the plan" if they didn't also feel like they were pulling one over on stupid, lazy, selfish Americans?

[Anonymous No.13512136]

Xi and his gang certainly are imposing

[Anonymous No.13512144]

>>13512113
they prefer harmony amongst themselves and work hard. It is like very patient collective payback for imperialism, and a dream to rise as the most advanced group in the world once again. Imperialism gave the same attitude to Vietnam, and Islamist areas

[Anonymous No.13512177]

>>13510321
>I would rather not read a book by the one westerner who opened relations with China and continues to enjoy extreme prestige and trust with the Chinese people, because he’s a meany

[Anonymous No.13512187]

>>13511921
>>13511604
No we aren’t. That’s pol.

What goes on in pol and lit are two entirely different things. On lit you start to see the predominance of people who actually believe in God, Atlantis, and antideluvian society.

>>13511369
>Religions and pseudo religions are a detriment to the mind and society

Imagine actually being this stupid.

Butterfly, you sound like a broken record. We are making progress over here with our discussions and you are mindlessly clinging to catchphrases from The Communist Manifesto. :3

I used to think Communism was the answer. Now I can see that it was because I was in college. You’re in California, a scourge on humanity. You are probably surrounded by fucking retarded gays and transsexuals.

[Anonymous No.13512209]

>>13512144
Where are you getting that from? I've seen plenty of videos of some very lazy people, and posturing at work like in Japan. I've also seen plenty of fights and conflict. Seems like there's not much concern for other people, but rather for not rocking the boat. Also, do they 1) realize how far behind they are, 2) realize that the US is a really bad measuring stick?

[Anonymous No.13512213]

>>13512187
dude. stop. don't reply. it's not cool. you're a bigger fag than she is.

[Anonymous No.13512216]

>>13512213
You wish, loser. I fucking make women feel like shit on the daily, including stupid ones like her.

I cherish the women I love and who love me, but these ones gotta feel the burn.

[Anonymous No.13512232]

>>13510176
The government is sneaky and evil.
The people fuck each over in China. Then they go to other countries, and provided they aren't government spies, they und up being pretty nice.

[Anonymous No.13512244]

>>13512216
You're an idiot. She wants (you)s. Stop replying. You only make it worse. Every time you respond to her, you make it worse.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13512253]

>>13512232
>The government is sneaky and evil.
As are they all

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13512258]

>>13512244
SHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.13512303]

>>13511595
>muh cells
>>13511625
>her
>>13511921
>MUH CELLS

This board is funny I should come here more often.

[Anonymous No.13512410]

>>13512303
It's not a joke. I don't give a shit what you call her/it/him, but don't respond.

[Anonymous No.13512849]

>>13512303
Kek. Satire has always been the fine art of derailure, much as I'd prefer to target the prohibitive trains of China here, since Eastern impersonality doesn't render much mind from matter. It's motive enough to fear and loathe censorship.

[Anonymous No.13512923]

>>13510176

If I became a living god tomorrow, capable of anything, the very first thing that I would do is to put down and overthrow the current Chinese state. Specifically, I would declare war upon the CPC and make their existence intolerable over a period of a few days, resulting in their unconditional surrender to myself. I would identify as my legitimate military targets, every CPC member (something over 20 million) and their direct support within the population.

Here is exactly what I would do. First of all, I would summarily confiscate all hard-power nukes, large ordnance and heavy inventory, at a stroke and in a very visible and conspicuous way. I would then announce myself and my plan: the Communist Party of China shall cease to exist, and it shall be replaced in China by another system of government, to be determined during a transitional period, following surrender. "You can pick any color as long as it isn't Red." I'd give them a few days and fair warning as to the start of the next phase.

Then it would begin. Starting with Xi, then adding double the number every day-the standing committee and the higher echelons, until (if necessary) every CPC member is involved, I would physically restrain each person and suspend them in unending, excruciating pain which yet does not cause injury (allowing only time for meals, bodily functions and sleep) until formal surrender is obtained. 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + ... this series entails everyone in the above 20 million estimate within a month.

[Anonymous No.13512953]

>>13510176
>>13512923
>>13512232
China is a lesser evil than USA at this point. It will be funny to watch all the burgers die in East Asia next, lol.

[Anonymous No.13512960]

>>13512953

This isn't true, and everyone who thinks that it is, is a stupid person. Regrettably, browsing /int/ for a bit confirms that large segments of the species believe this manifest falsehood.

[Anonymous No.13512969]

>>13511463
This. When are people going to stop replying to these retards?

[Anonymous No.13512990]

>>13512960
China isn't the one who is destabilizing entire regions of the world, arming terrorists, funding drug trades, and then opening borders to, said, terrorists to the point it threatens their own citizens. USA/NATO always needs an enemy due to Military Industrial Complex. It seems the new one will be China soon. It is very tiresome.

[Anonymous No.13513000]

>>13512923
So that sadistic power fantasy is interesting and all but why would you even do that?

[Anonymous No.13513010]

Xi is based.
The only proper criticisms of china come from other marxists and anarchists

[Anonymous No.13513030]

>>13513000

Because the Communist Party of China is the foremost abjectly intolerable evil in this world, which should be put down at a stroke. I am one hundred percent serious about this.

[Anonymous No.13513038]

>>13513010

-19 points, the posting of the image is far more (negatively) potent than the slight praise for Xi.

[Anonymous No.13513040]

>>13513030
Maybe you Americans should look at yourselves for once? Do you know how many countries you've fucked with in the past 50 years and still continue to do so? Maybe it's time you stop with the imperialism and focus on your own problems?

[Anonymous No.13513054]

>>13513030
Yeah that didn't answer anything. I got that you think they're evil from the first post, believe me. I'm asking you what is it specifically that's supposed to make them so evil.

[Anonymous No.13513084]

>>13513040

Communism is an abjectly intolerable evil and must be put down everywhere that it takes root. Fortunately, the past thirty years have seen great strides in this direction, with no signs of stopping. Notwithstanding the communist-in-name-only character of the false Chinese state, it must still be eliminated on general principles. Nor, on balance, is it even legitimate to whine about CIA operations, both for the above reason (I delight in Che's corpse among other things, as should you) and also because Mexico and the Middle East overwhelmingly fuck themselves independently of CIA operations. The routine skinning and mutilation of victims in Mexico's drug war is peculiar to the depravity of the Mexican criminal people themselves, and is not down to CIA arms sales, specifically. And the Middle East, well, they're benighted by Islam. On our end, the only trouble is lack of sustained, domestic cohesive political will as a result of our own pussification. There, and only there, you might have something.

[Anonymous No.13513088]

>>13513084
>everyone is to blame but USA!
You are a dumb neocon who ignores USA/NATO's own hypocrisies, which I could spent a long time listing but think it would be a waste time anyways. Don't you have some more weapons to sell to Saudis so they do another 9/11?
Also, China isn't really communist. They are still capitalistic. They just have a more despotic method of governance, which USA has no moral high-ground to criticize. After all, USA is a war-mongering plutocratic nation.

[Anonymous No.13513102]

>>13513088
>They are still capitalistic
When did this happen? Can I open up a shop there and export goods to them?

[Anonymous No.13513112]

>>13510176
wrong board
>>>/int/

[Anonymous No.13513120]

>>13513102
Many people do travel to China to do business.
Also, local businesses don't easily thrive in the USA either. Big corporations tend to buy them out or apply different economic means to sabotage them. I'm saying Americans need to focus on their own problems for once instead of instigating shit on an international level. It's getting tiresome.

[Anonymous No.13513128]

>>13513120
>economic means
meant to say "tactics"*
Sorry, it's late.

[Anonymous No.13513135]

>>13513102

I'm the anti-communist anon. China's (partial) market liberalization is normally traced to Deng's opening-up of the country, and to numbered policies such as "one country, two systems". They even had the slogan "to get rich is glorious", a 180 from Mao's period, Deng's answer to the post-Stalin Khrushchev thaw. A useful text on this the Harvard Design School's "Great Leap Forward" which looks at China's development at the turn of the millenium. It details the establishment of Special Economic Zones along the coastal south, near Hong Kong/Macao, particularly Shenzhen (in Guangdong) etc.

[Anonymous No.13513200]

>>13513112
Haha right. nah, I want somewhat serious answers

[Anonymous No.13513211]

>>13512953
Whatever you say Chairman.

[Anonymous No.13513217]

>>13513211
It's time Americans stop being the global police and focus on their own domestic issues.

[Anonymous No.13513221]

>>13513217
Ching chong, you're about 20 years too late on that meme.

[Anonymous No.13513264]

>>13513221
Is it incomprehensible to you that a non-Chinese could condemn unwarranted American saber-rattling? I never denied modern China has significant problems. I'm telling you to fuck with the war-mongering rhetoric, faggot. America is over-exceeding its grasp in the geopolitical stage and needs to focus on its own domestic shit for once. This is why I said China is the "lesser evil" at this point.

[Anonymous No.13513387]

you know i think more than anything i just hate the us and i like anyone who is a credible threat to us power in some form (china, russia, iran, syria, etc.). imo china seems destined to the rule the world, with russia as a sort of junior partner filling the role the us previously held in europe handling their military defense (putin has even suggested this in a speech), which i suspect the average europe will prefer to the alternative due to the us aggressively pushing mass immigration/mulitculturalism/etc. and putin speaking out against this and even funding nationalist parties throughout europe. i also suspect iran will replace saudi arabia as the dominate power in the middle east. israel will lose much of its influence and power. imo this arrangement will be far preferable to what we have now. i for one welcome our multipolar nazbol world order.

[Anonymous No.13513397]

>>13510226
I've known some very nice Chinese people. Their country is not as closed off from the outside as in the older decades but their state media does have a negative view of the US (just as our media is negative towards them).

[Anonymous No.13513401]

>>13513102
The official state slogan is "Socialism in 20 years" iirc.

[Anonymous No.13513412]

They're literally just capitalists and the right hand of ZOG. US-China conflict is a meme.

[Anonymous No.13513416]

>>13510176
>I have a bit of a negative view of China.
Why though? Democracy is a horrible system of governance.

[Anonymous No.13513490]

>>13512923
based

[Anonymous No.13513553]

>>13513102
They haven't been communists since Mao died. They've been very protectionist and mercantilist up until now, which is why you can't easily set up shop there, but are now planning on making it easier for foreigners to invest in and own chinese companies.
Just like your capitalists sold you out by using cheap chinese labour for manufactoring, I suspect in the end the CCP will sell out to capital as well.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !mxvabIoSIE No.13513555]

>>13513416
Where is the democracy?

[Anonymous No.13513578]

>>13513416
In its present condition, agreed, but democracy as it was originally conceived in some states (land-owners) is a very attractive alternative to oligarchies/dictatorships in a patchwork setting.

[Anonymous No.13513585]

>>13513010
The Christians have a fair critique to make as well.

[Anonymous No.13513596]

>>13513553
I should add, whether they prioritise national or economic interests in the end, it's refreshing to see they aren't cucked by the US national interest into signing plaza accords the moment they seem slightly competitive. If only so that you won't spend the next 50 years on your fat stagnant arses

[Anonymous No.13513602]

>>13513416
China will save us from democracy, thank god.

[Anonymous No.13513716]

How do I block tripcodes without faggy extensions

[Anonymous No.13513774]

>>13512923
Now this is cringe inducing.

[Anonymous No.13513780]

>>13513084
Those are a lot of words, considering you basically said nothing other than empty rhetoric.

[Anonymous No.13514200]

Anybody read this book or has opinions on ideas along those lines?

https://www.amazon.com/Doesnt-Have-Be-Crazy-Work/dp/0062874780

>In this timely manifesto, the authors of the New York Times bestseller Rework broadly reject the prevailing notion that long hours, aggressive hustle, and "whatever it takes" are required to run a successful business today.
>In Rework, Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson introduced a new path to working effectively. Now, they build on their message with a bold, iconoclastic strategy for creating the ideal company culture—what they call "the calm company." Their approach directly attack the chaos, anxiety, and stress that plagues millions of workplaces and hampers billions of workers every day.
>Long hours, an excessive workload, and a lack of sleep have become a badge of honor for modern professionals. But it should be a mark of stupidity, the authors argue. Sadly, this isn’t just a problem for large organizations—individuals, contractors, and solopreneurs are burning themselves out the same way. The answer to better productivity isn’t more hours—it’s less waste and fewer things that induce distraction and persistent stress.
>It’s time to stop celebrating Crazy, and start celebrating Calm, Fried and Hansson assert.
>Fried and Hansson have the proof to back up their argument. "Calm" has been the cornerstone of their company’s culture since Basecamp began twenty years ago. Destined to become the management guide for the next generation, It Doesn't Have to Be Crazy at Work is a practical and inspiring distillation of their insights and experiences. It isn’t a book telling you what to do. It’s a book showing you what they’ve done—and how any manager or executive no matter the industry or size of the company, can do it too.

[Anonymous No.13514278]

>>13510176
The only people I have a negative view of are jews and niggers and women.

[Anonymous No.13515497]

>>13512923

If you became a living God why would you do something so slow and retarded

[Anonymous No.13516723]

>>13510176
Most of chink propaganda is on how smelly niggers are and how smart and soulful chinks are. Japan is portrayed as rats and Americans as fat obedient lardballs a le Wall-e. Europeans are shit(only thing the chinks got right) and North Korea is seen as oppressed.
There I have gaven you a basic gestalt in China propaganda.

[Anonymous No.13516755]

>>13512923
>allowing only time for meals, bodily functions and sleep

Psychological torture is actually more effective. Sleep deprivation in particular is brutal.

[Anonymous No.13517830]

>>13513264
Sure thing Chairman.

[Anonymous No.13518058]

>>13511374
sounds like American propaganda about Russia lel except Russians are portrayed as devious masterminds instead of idiots

[Anonymous No.13518091]

>>13513387
russia just funds whoever might benefit russia at any given time, they also have churka immigration instead of mexican or african so it's not like they're really a "bastion of morality and nationalism against western degeneracy". Russia always oscillates between this attitude and insecure copying of the West anyway.

>which i suspect the average europe will prefer to the alternative due to the us aggressively pushing mass immigration/mulitculturalism/etc.
>Poland, take refugees!
>No.
>o-o-o-okay.. :'(
most beta empire ever.

[Anonymous No.13518103]

I'm an american who recently saw through the US media tricks on china. it really opened my eyes. instead of seeing this barbaric, authoritarian land filled with people who want to kill americans i just saw a strong country making the right decisions for themselves while the US makes all the wrong ones. Good for China for sticking up for themselves and their interests.

[Anonymous No.13518117]

>>13518103
>hurr China stealing our IP and stuff!
Always a bit amused by this attitude. While the accusations aren't really wrong, one has to think "Well, you pretty much just let them have it..."

Surely you must've caught on after 30 years? Oh wait, you just didn't care until you realized you were going to get put out of business. Same goes for the housing market or intel agency co-optation. Again, Australia, NZ, Canada etc. wanted to pump the housing market because they having nothing else.

[Anonymous No.13518142]

>keep hearing about how china is supposed to be the next superpower and therefore the next cultural superpower just like japan was
>mfw china just shits out nothing but ugly cgi movies, makes the same fake music as the US and just blatantly copies japanese anime
they were wrong
they were all fucking wrong

[Anonymous No.13518964]

>>13510176
>tfw Xi Jinping is putting together a team

[Anonymous No.13518976]

>>13518142
People/factions in the Chinese government have a habit of literally shutting down pop culture when it gets too entertaining