[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 655 KB, 1167x561, 1396718742196.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13473577 No.13473577 [Reply] [Original]

So is accelerationism just scifi/cyberpunk but philosophy?

>> No.13473592
File: 925 KB, 1367x2000, zo bad id gud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13473592

>>13473577
It's postironic Frankfurt School.

>> No.13473597

>>13473577
>Nonrepresentational art is bad because I dont immediately understand it

Fucking die

>> No.13473606

>>13473597
>nonrepresentational art is good because i don't immediately understand it
kys

>> No.13473607
File: 120 KB, 789x1179, Statue f (21).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13473607

When you fucking faggots (and by you, I mean literally everyone on earth) stop using the word Art incorrectly, this won't be a problem.

The left is art. The right is creative. It's bad, but it's a creative venture. Art should be decoupled from the concept of making things up; art specifically replies to beautiful and attractive things. Things can be creative and expressive without being art. It's the best of both worlds so modern art fags can have their cans of feces too, without it being obnoxious.

>> No.13473608

>>13473597

Normally I would agree, but in that particular case the OP pic certainly seems to have a point

>> No.13473612

>>13473592
Is this movie as graphic as everyone says?

>> No.13473619

>>13473597
no: bad art is bad

>> No.13473625
File: 192 KB, 1195x1128, Crucifixion_Diptych_(Rogier_van_der_Weyden).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13473625

>>13473577
The pic on the left is such an uninspired piece of art*, at least choose something more dynamic.

*The painting itself is probably impressive IRL, but these little thumbnail reproductions are about as inspired as postcards. The creator of the image obviously chose it more for what they think it "represents" (classical subject matter, important topic, big masculine statue to wank over) than because of the visual power of the image in so reduced a form. The strange fact about /pol/ is they idolise works of art from comparatively late period in the history of European art -- mostly decadent kitsch from very very late 19th century. Stagnated formalist nonsense for housewives. Dried up and desiccated. The artistic output of a wilting culture. If anything modernism represents a return to form, to medieval vitality, to things beyond appearances.

>> No.13473629

>>13473607
Words don't have fixed meanings. You can cling to your definition of art all you want but the reality is that art is anything contextualized as such.

>> No.13473633

>>13473629
His definition of art is revisionist. He invented it. He's not clinging to anything, he's making fanciful innovations.

>> No.13473695

>>13473597
It’s bad because it has no use in higher culture, pleb.

>> No.13473740

>>13473625
>The pic on the left is such an uninspired piece of art*, at least choose something more dynamic.
no the one on the left is superior

>> No.13473744

>>13473597
everything in art is representational

>> No.13473795

>>13473744
Some bronze age religious art is literal


Fag

>> No.13473816

>>13473740
No shit, doesn't mean "it's da best over OMG save the west guys..."