Kino Book Covers

[Anonymous No.13450907]

ITT: Kino book covers. If you post a paperback, it better be goddamn spectacular.

I'll start with pic related: Ulysses, Joyce - Limited Editions Club (George Macy). It's the only edition of an illustrated Ulysses that Joyce personally signed.

Don't look up the price unless you want to feel depressed about the fact you won't be able to afford it if you ever manage to find it.

[Anonymous No.13450911]

Another favorite: The Master & Margarita, Bulgakov - Folio Society. Translations by P&V.

[Anonymous No.13450922]

Alice in Wonderland, Carroll - Easton Press.

[Anonymous No.13450929]

Dracula, Stoker - Amaranthine Press.

[Anonymous No.13450941]

Good thread op. I really like Steppenwolf by FS

[Anonymous No.13450956]

>>13450941
Thanks, anon. That's a great edition. I'm glad I ordered it during the sale.

No one seems to be interested in the thread so maybe I'll try a different night.

[Anonymous No.13450985]

>>13450907

Not impressed. I'd much rather have the Arion Press edition with illustration by Robert Motherwell.

[Anonymous No.13450999]

N_________

[Anonymous No.13451000]

>>13450985
That's a great alternative. Personally, I like Matisse's illustrations more, though the production of Arion (paper, font, general workmanship) is one of the finest of the 20th century. I've heard there are a dozen or so "print-only" copies of the AP Ulysses; they fetch the better part of ten grand on the secondary market. I would love to own it one day.

All that said, I think LEC captures the spirit of Ulysses better with its cover design, though Arion is better in all other ways.

As a fellow Joyce fan, have a look at Folio's LE of Finnegans. I love the dreamscape they've painted.

[Anonymous No.13451004]

[Anonymous No.13451022]

>>13450999
Nice. Do you own that?

[Anonymous No.13451036]

[Anonymous No.13451038]

[Anonymous No.13451041]

>>13451000

I'm the guy you replied to and I've never read Ulysses, kek. I just like Motherwell. Read Portrait once though.

While we're on fine books I might actually pop for a copy of this at some point, even though I've already read it.

[Anonymous No.13451047]

>>13451038

[Anonymous No.13451051]

>>13451036
What is that?

[Anonymous No.13451054]

>>13451041
Ah gotcha. Yeah, Motherwell is a legend. I'm not too big into abstract art, so I don't know much about the Anfam you've linked. Is it about theory?

[Anonymous No.13451060]

>>13451051
Man and His Symbols by Jung.
I actually found a copy of it myself in a local bookstore but it's in much worse condition sadly

[Anonymous No.13451089]

>>13451054

Pic related is an example of a catalogue raisonné, a complete listing/reproduction of all an artist's works (in a given medium, painting in this case as opposed to drawings, etc). While they're currently fashionable (and spendy) for modern art, the book-concept is simple enough.

This particular one has the great advantage of being accompanied by a series of excellent essays by Anfam, together with his autistic attention to technical detail on provenance, confusion between paintings, etc. He uses fancy ten-dollar words like "recondite" and "jejune" to good effect. Rothko is one of the most easily hated abstract artists, but when you page through the thing you do get the visual sense of how he moved from his little naive portraits with blocky figures, to the squiggly mythological forms, finally to the rectangles.

[Anonymous No.13451092]

Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan. He specifically described its intended design too- incredibly cool even today, and particularly for the time period.

[Anonymous No.13451098]

>>13451092
I'm retarded. Here's the image.

[Anonymous No.13451233]

>>13451098
That's a great cover.

[Anonymous No.13451294]

>>13451233
>>13451098

It's very obviously a frontispiece as opposed to a book cover, and a cursory wiki double-check bears this out before I hit "post".

Printed books of the period didn't typically have fancy covers (if anything at all apart from author-title), but they could readily whip together a nice frontispiece as a print, as in pic related, which would be committed to a page rather than a design incorporated into the much thicker material of a cover itself.

[Anonymous No.13451300]

>>13451294
Appreciate the info.

[Anonymous No.13451380]

I saw the thumbnail and literally said to myself "ah yes, the limited editions club Ulysses"

...am I a pseud?

[Anonymous No.13451403]

>>13450907
>If you post a paperback, it better be goddamn spectacular.
Challenge accepted.

[Anonymous No.13451417]

>>13451380
Why would that make you a pseud?

[Anonymous No.13451430]

>>13451417
idk I was just poking fun at myself for the way I said it. Really it was just that I literally said "ah yes" which is a pseud-y thing to say because it announces to others you're familiar with something and able to appreciate it.

[Anonymous No.13451437]

>>13451430
Did you say it aloud, or think it? This is important.

[Anonymous No.13451444]

>>13451022
i wish

[Anonymous No.13451448]

>>13451437
I kind of whispered it inaudibly

[Anonymous No.13451450]

>>13451430
lol you sound like a good dude anon. It's pretty cool that you recognized the edition 2bh. It's so beautiful, isn't it? I aim to acquire the Easton Press facsimile soon.

[Anonymous No.13451463]

A local used bookstore has a $1600 massive (probably about two and a half feet tall) copy of The Raven illustrated by Gustave Doré from the late 1800s. I never even knew Doré illustrated any Poe, and that bookstore generally sucks dick most of the time - it's one of those places that gets 90% of its revenue from Funko Pops and Harry Potter merchandise. They've only had a "rare books" case for a couple months, and I honestly think they made it specifically because somebody dropped this cool monstrosity off.

[Anonymous No.13451476]

>>13451463
Got any pics?

[Anonymous No.13451487]

>>13451450
>It's pretty cool that you recognized the edition 2bh.
I was browsing the most expensive Ulysses-es available on Abe Books out of curiosity, and I remembered the publisher because I know it's related to Heritage Press (both were owned by George Macy), and I know Heritage Press because my grandfather gave me a bunch of their books.

[Anonymous No.13451493]

>>13451476
I googled it and it has this cover. Seem to be a few copies floating around the internet, mostly selling for $1000-$2000. The one in the shop is in a glass case so I can't go take any pics of the actual illustrations, but they're also googlable.
All of these were printed in one run in 1884, and Doré died in 1883, so this must've been one of the last sets - if not the very last set - of illustrations he ever did.

[Anonymous No.13451497]

>>13451487
Lucky you, anon. Yeah, LEC in the prime years is the gold standard. Each book used letterpress and had individual hand- drawn illustrations (meaning no two books were the same). The book came numbered (the Club always limited printing to 1500) and hand-signed by the artist, as well as sometimes the author.

They don't make 'em like they used to, pal. The HPs are facsimiles of those golden years of fine press. What a wonderful gift from your grandfather. Perhaps you wouldn't mind sharing your collection if you're able?

[Anonymous No.13451501]

>>13451493
That's awesome. You gonna put in a bid? :^)

[Anonymous No.13451520]

>>13451501
I would literally need to take out a loan to buy this thing. I just graduated college and I'm still only in interviews for jobs.

[Anonymous No.13451530]

>>13451520
haha I was mostly joking. I'm in the same boat as you. Good luck on the job hunt. :)

[Anonymous No.13451531]

[Anonymous No.13451539]

>>13451531
I haven't read Trollope but what a kino title. Penguin usually has such great covers too.

[Anonymous No.13451548]

>>13451530
Thanks anon.
My most prized book is actually a 1934 copy of Milton's Complete Poems with the Doré illustrations of Paradise Lost. I got it for $20, which still seems unbelievable.
I picked it up as a present for my ex on a trip and she gave it back to me when we broke up. So I don't read it. It's on my shelf. One day.

[Anonymous No.13451559]

>>13451497
>Perhaps you wouldn't mind sharing your collection if you're able?
They're scattered around the house. Also I'm still in the process of getting them, I'm taking a few home every time I visit my grandfather (he's 91). But this one is my favorite, the book of Proverbs. I wish he had Psalms too, I'll probably get that online at some point.

(I typed this on my computer but images are on my phone, stand by...)

[Anonymous No.13451566]

>>13451548
Give it time, anon. All will be well. That is indeed a very lucky find.

[Anonymous No.13451589]

[Anonymous No.13451598]

[Anonymous No.13451599]

>>13451559
>Error: Your image contains an embedded file.
Uh, no it doesn't.

cover:
https://files.catbox.moe/wdlqbd.jpeg

title page:
https://files.catbox.moe/l6o25k.jpeg

regular pages:
https://files.catbox.moe/twk88i.jpeg

[Anonymous No.13451610]

>>13451599
If I knew you I would be willing to literally fight you for, or at least break into your house for, a collection of books that nice

[Anonymous No.13451621]

>>13451599
That is really nice. Thanks for sharing, anon.
>>13451598
Fun cover. I like this version as well (pic related).

[Anonymous No.13451626]

>>13451610
Most of them are pretty inexpensive online, an assault charge would certainly cost you more.

https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?bi=h&bx=off&cm_sp=sort-_-SRP-_-Results&ds=30&pn=Heritage%20Press&recentlyadded=all&sortby=20&tn=Proverbs

[Anonymous No.13451627]

>>13451598
>>13451621

[Anonymous No.13451635]

>>13451627
Gorgeous color tones and gilding but I think I'd like it more if the front page was just velvet leather. The spine says it all beautifully, really.

[Anonymous No.13451643]

[Anonymous No.13451646]

Mfw all these anons being suckered out of their money.

You will all learn.

[Anonymous No.13451648]

>>13451646
>don't spend anything on anything, ever
let people live you dork

[Anonymous No.13451658]

I really like the first edition. It has two dust covers, one is clear plastic and has the author's name and the title only, and the lower cover has a pseudo-old paper feel and just has "SON & XON" on the front

[Anonymous No.13451704]

[Anonymous No.13451802]

[JN !!vXXhA/qzhjm No.13451887]

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

HST would literally be unknown today if not for Ralph Steadman's drawings

[Anonymous No.13451921]

>>13451658
I bought this at a library sale for $3 in good condition, didn't know it was first edition until now. I'll have to make a point of treating it especially carefully in case its value rises in the future

[Anonymous No.13451927]

>>13451802
>huge ugly letters
>best seller/author of advertising
>A page-turner
Yikes.

[Anonymous No.13451949]

>>13451921
Unlikely, Pynchon was already well known by then and these were mass-produced. Only Gravity's Rainbow and prior books will have any real value.

[Anonymous No.13451960]

>>13451921
Also to be sure yours is first edition, check the copyright page. It will say first edition towards the bottom. If it has all numbers 1-10 at the very bottom just above the "author wishes to thank" box then it's also a first printing.

[Anonymous No.13451972]

>>13451949
damn, nice to have though
>>13451960
>all numbers 1-10
they're all there, but in an odd order. is that just stylization or is the first printing specifically 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10?

[Anonymous No.13451981]

[Anonymous No.13451988]

>>13451648
Not what i said but whatever, sure, i see you guys are paying $125 for Game of Thrones 1. Well, if it makes you happy ...

[Anonymous No.13451990]

Reminder that the best edition of Pale Fire is not the first edition, nor the modern Vintage Books edition, nor the autistic G*ngko facsimile, but the Arion Press separation

[Anonymous No.13452013]

>>13451990
too bad Arion is so expensive. their publications are exemplary.

[Anonymous No.13452207]

I saw pic related in a second hand store for under 10 euro, the print is perfect too
was so tempted but I already have a copy of moby dick and I'm not *that* bad of a materialist

[Anonymous No.13452285]

>>13450985
I lost my mind for this edition of Ulysses. The grey is uncovered pasteboard. I was in design school when it came out, so I near creamed my pants. unfortunately, I can't find a decent pic of it.

[Anonymous No.13452297]

>>13450907
rise and fall of medieval monasticism
folio society

[Anonymous No.13452304]

[Anonymous No.13452495]

>>13450907

[Anonymous No.13452510]

>>13450907

[Anonymous No.13452560]

I almost never use the soi meme and find most soi posters obnoxious and low-IQ, but this is a soi thread if I've ever seen one. It's like the insects on reddit who fetishize books for their smell, association with intelligence and knowledge, everything else except their content. Just read the goddamn books and get over it.

[Anonymous No.13452625]

>>13452495
Based Todd Hido.

[Anonymous No.13452702]

>>13452560
fuck off

[Anonymous No.13452708]

[Anonymous No.13452778]

>>13450907

This is a nice friendly thread guys (discounting a couple of comments) well done.

[Anonymous No.13453289]

>>13451972
The number aren't supposed to be in order. The way they show printings is by removing the lowest number. So the second printing would just have 2-10. They numbers are ordered like that so they stay more or less centered throughout printings.

[Anonymous No.13453302]

>>13450911
>Translations by P&V
oh no no no

[Anonymous No.13453503]

>>13450907
E. L. Doctorow’s Random House paperbacks have plenty of aesthetic value.

[Anonymous No.13453540]

>>13452560
This, the amount of salt from any backlash just proves it.

>>13452778
...

[Anonymous No.13453550]

>>13452013
Fucking christ dude. Theyre jewing people out of money and you fucking morons cant see it. You dont like literature, because if you did youd know the text contains all the aesthetic you need as long as the book doesnt look like some kitchy wordsworth embarrasment and you wouldnt spend 100 dolöars on a bool that looks nice just to show off. This is the most Reddit soi thread ive seen on /lit/

[Anonymous No.13453562]

>>13453550
>as long as the book doesnt look like some kitchy wordsworth embarrasment
And what's wrong with that? I thought the text had all the aesthetic I needed?

[Anonymous No.13453577]

My edition of maldoror

[Anonymous No.13453584]

>>13453577
Also this edition of Cioran

[Anonymous No.13453651]

>>13453550
Books are the only thing I collect, and most of mine look okay or worse, but sometimes a very cool edition comes along
I've never spent more than $25 on a book, and even if I had, I wouldn't fucking care if I was getting jewed if it's something I'll enjoy the rest of my life
If this is the most reddit thread you've ever seen you can't have spent more than an hour on this board

[Anonymous No.13453654]

>>13450911
Still salty about this one, really wanted to get it until I realized it was the dead translation.

[Anonymous No.13453736]

>>13451038
You can't be serious.
That book is great because IIRC is the most complete of the complete work books, but that cover is tacky

[Anonymous No.13453835]

>>13453736
He's not serious, the B&N covers from that print series are a meme, friend

[Anonymous No.13453854]

>>13453503
I liked Ragtime. I want to read World's Fair.

[Anonymous No.13453870]

>>13453736
It's not the most complete; pic related is.

[Anonymous No.13453878]

>>13452560
With the proliferation of smart phones and tablets, online libraries and black market PDFs, literature has become entirely deterritorialized from the physical book-object. Infinite reproducibility of cultural artifacts removes entirely supply from the demand curve, and literature’s physical avatar, the book, stands alienated from its original function, with purely tactile considerations to justify its existence. Over the course of last decade, the material book-object has transformed from the noble and worthy receptacle of cultural transmission to a base and materialistic luxury product, dependent on its cultural prestige to mask the vulgar materialism that now justifies its existence. A hundred years ago book burnings were rightly considered monstrous: today they’re too ridiculously pointless to bother with.

[Anonymous No.13453890]

>>13450929
Jesus, that cover is just beautiful.

[Anonymous No.13453899]

>>13453878
Oh for sure bro. Let's also burn all the chessboards because you can play online and all food because it can be replaced with convenient pills that have all the macros and micros you need.

[Anonymous No.13453968]

[Anonymous No.13453973]

>>13453503
Can someone give me the source on those paintings used for the Ragtime and Billy Bathgate covers?

[Anonymous No.13453974]

>>13453968
The frontispiece is nice too.

[Anonymous No.13454007]

[Anonymous No.13454025]

>>13453550
this

>>13451990
fancy but is there any substantial reason to separate them? feels counter to the spirit of both book and poem

[Anonymous No.13454166]

>>13452560
>>13453540
>>13453550
waa waa waa

[Anonymous No.13454185]

[Anonymous No.13454200]

I think it's not inaccurate to say that old hardback covers are generally nice, while modern covers, hardback or not, are generally shit. Pure decline.

[Anonymous No.13454440]

>>13450929
amaranthine has beautiful books.. too bad im broke

[Anonymous No.13454551]

>>13450907
ok
>>13450911
tacky
>>13450922
pretty nice
>>13450929
kitsch
>>13450941
awful
>>13450985
meh
>>13450999
spectacular (i have that one too)
>>13451000
actually really cool
>>13451004
vomit inducing
>>13451036
nothing special
>>13451038
just utter tripe
>>13451041
nice
>>13451047
tryhard
>>13451403
ive seen nicer editions of that book
>>13451493
adolescent
>>13451531
>penguin
lol
>>13451589
good in an ironic way
>>13451598
>everyman’s
patrician
>>13451621
that’s really nice
>>13451627
petit bourgeois
>>13451643
i like it
>>13451658
not my style
>>13451704
i like it but i don’t know why
>>13451802
gross
>>13451981
ok
>>13451990
pretty nice
>>13452207
too edgy
>>13452285
too social democrat aesthetic
>>13452297
interesting concept, poor execution
>>13452304
truly inspired
>>13452495
i don’t want to like it but i do
>>13452510
tiddies
>>13452708
nice edition
>>13453503
respectable and decent
>>13453577
>penguin
lol
>>13453584
too french and existential aesthetic
>>13453870
why are all these lovecraft covers so atrocious
>>13453968
based
>>13453974
less based
>>13454007
looks like an old comp sci textbook from the 60s
>>13454185
based pan
>>13454200
too childish

[Anonymous No.13454611]

>>13454551
wow thanks for the input, i'm absolutely going to read that

[Anonymous No.13454630]

>>13454611
one day in the distant future internet historians will discover my post in an obscure archive and they will hail it as a tremendous breakthrough in book cover critique

[Anonymous No.13454796]

Mine might not typically stand out but I adore this homely yet elegant type of cover more than sleeves or illustrations. Pic related and the next are what I'm currently reading in any case.

[Anonymous No.13454803]

>>13454796

[Anonymous No.13454811]

>>13454630
Why would anybody care about the opinion of somebody who considers Gustave Doré "adolescent"

[Anonymous No.13454832]

>>13454811
im critiquing the art style of the cover not the book

[Anonymous No.13454853]

>>13454551
your taste is jejune, I'm afraid

[Anonymous No.13454854]

>>13454832
The author of The Raven was Poe, Doré was the illustrator, including cover design. He's arguably the most famous book illustrator of all time.
You're making it even harder to give a shit about what you think.

[Anonymous No.13455054]

My favorite cover ever
Oxford World’s classics paperbacks are the best paperbacks

[Anonymous No.13455081]

>>13455054
Ehhh

[Anonymous No.13455094]

>>13455054
they’re awful. they have the dumbest most redundant endnotes i have ever encountered. they’re literally made for retards

[Anonymous No.13455112]

>>13455054
Looks like an Indian rug desu.

[Anonymous No.13455129]

>>13455094
t. Historylet

[Anonymous No.13455131]

The Faerie Queene, Spenser - Folio Society Limited Edition.

[Anonymous No.13455138]

>muh kitschy gold leaf hardcovers
Grow up. You may not like it but paperbacks c. 1960s are the true book kino.

[Anonymous No.13455140]

>>13455129
you have it backwards. oxford classics is for historylets who need to be told basic and obvious shit in the footnotes like that “lord of the trident” refers to poseidon and other basic crap

[Anonymous No.13455148]

>>13454551
kys

[Anonymous No.13455156]

A Passage to India, Forster - Grosset & Dunlap, 1924

[Anonymous No.13455160]

Heart of Darkness, Conrad - Limited Editions Club

[Anonymous No.13455165]

>>13450907
have always loved pictured, bit of a cartoony vibe from the light blue font, and the cartoony feel is also present while reading it.
>>13450985
I like that it kept a color at least similar to that of the first edition, which meant to have the color of the greek flag

[Anonymous No.13455166]

>>13453302
will people stop pretending to know what you're talking about? lmao

[Anonymous No.13455183]

[Anonymous No.13455191]

>>13455166
Just ignore anyone who rips on P&V. It's the equivalent of not rating Shakespeare as a playwright.

Dracula, Stoker - Easton Press Deluxe Limited Edition

[Anonymous No.13455196]

>>13455140
who do you like then?

[Anonymous No.13455200]

>>13455196
i mean, as far as endnotes/footnotes penguin is definitely of a higher quality than oxford.

[Anonymous No.13455216]

The Book of the 1001 Nights - Borders Classics. Translations by John Payne.

[Anonymous No.13455229]

>>13450907

My favorite covers are those ugly pale covers from the 70s and 80s, especially if they've got a pale background, or that tan frame around it, if anybody knows what I'm talking about, and even more if they're creased. Something like this. I have no idea why, but I go absolutely crazy for 'em. I'd unironically choose some tatty covered edition from the 80s than a FS edition without hesitation.

I also like children's books from the 50s.

[Anonymous No.13455242]

>>13455200
I didn’t know penguin had employees paid to shill on an anonymous image board

[Anonymous No.13455253]

>>13455229

[Anonymous No.13455255]

The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald - Folio Society (latest edition).

[Anonymous No.13455258]

>>13455183
>penguin classic
>kino
LMAOing at your life

[Anonymous No.13455316]

>>13455258
that cover is nice =)

[Anonymous No.13455383]

>>13455165
Pynchon has some nice covers. I read on some blog that this one was ugly but I like it a lot.

[Anonymous No.13455397]

>>13455229
>>13455253

[Anonymous No.13455415]

Bought both of these not long ago. The watchtapes is top tier because I'm a sucker for 90s minimalism and the review is the epitome of what a little mag cover should be

[Anonymous No.13455429]

Lolita, Nabakov - Folio Society

one of my all-time favorites. the color tones perfectly represent the duality of innocence and darkness in the book.

[Anonymous No.13455444]

>>13455415
I do love the hentai one
what's it about?

[Anonymous No.13455445]

>>13452708
>>13452495
Japan does comfy so well. So sad I can't be a part of it. But I know that if I was then I would be a cog making it comfortable to outsiders while my own life would be endless toil and misery. Ah.

[Anonymous No.13455451]

>>13452560
I collect books because I like history and can't afford paintings and sculptures. Nerd.

[Anonymous No.13455466]

[Anonymous No.13455467]

>>13455444
It's an art book.

[Anonymous No.13455483]

>>13455445
I think so too. they've got some good shit going on, but the bindings of their books make me jittery for some reason. They don't feel flimsy, exactly, but... petit? Small? At least all the ones I've held in my hand. I don't know... Maybe because of the dust jackets?

[Anonymous No.13455491]

>>13455466
raise

[Anonymous No.13455498]

>>13455467
ah, nice.

[Anonymous No.13455737]

Reddit: the thread.
No wonder people are barely read on this board

[Anonymous No.13455750]

>>13455737
this is such a reddit post, oh my god

[Anonymous No.13455759]

>>13455737
you have to go back

[Anonymous No.13456722]

Gene Wolfe has some good ones.

[Anonymous No.13456732]

>>13453302
>>13455166
>>13455191
what is/isn't good about P&V? I've been looking into reading Master and Margarita for a while and while I can find much complaining about their translations (and much praise), I can't figure out why they're so controversial.

[Anonymous No.13456770]

>>13456722
The rest of the BotNS first edition covers aren't anything special, but pic related is so good I've considered getting a poster made of it.

[Anonymous No.13457123]

>>13456732
V translates literally and P edits. People are mad that directly translated Russian, and thus the Russian language itself, doesn't have a poetic cadence to it like Romantic, Latin, Turkic, and Indo-Aryan languages.

Russian is dry. Tolstoy, Bulgakov, Dostoevsky, etc. write drily. The translation, of high fidelity, is dry.

[Anonymous No.13457134]

>>13456770
>>13456722

[Anonymous No.13457300]

[Anonymous No.13457702]

>>13451000
>>13457134
how dare they make editions this nice and then print only one run of them

[Anonymous No.13458157]

Plain Everyman's classics, and other imprints with a common format that is simple and tasteful, are vastly superior to overwrought, gaudy, tacky, garish covers that look more like a Harry Potter prop, bad graphic design coursework or objet d'art marketed to the kind of people who buy Funko Pops.
You can tell that so many of these aren't meant to because of their frankly ridiculous size or decoration.
>>13455466
>>13455415
>>13455183
>>13455054
>>13454803
>>13454796
>>13453974
>>13453584
>>13453577
>>13451981
>>13451643
>>13451589
>>13450907
Are the best in thread as books which someone would actually own and read, regardless of the artistic merit present in any of the other covers posted.

[Anonymous No.13458318]

>>13458157
>mass replier
>shite taste
couldn't be any different

[Anonymous No.13458383]

Obligatory

[Anonymous No.13458661]

>>13457123
>Russian is dry
Maybe that’s why I love Russian lit so much. I’m a dry person

[Anonymous No.13458721]

>>13455491
What edition is this?

[Anonymous No.13459752]

[Anonymous No.13459828]

>>13458721
It's just a concept.

[Anonymous No.13460066]

>>13455466

[Anonymous No.13460124]

>>13455466
>>13460066
>dubs
>same type
absolutely based

[Anonymous No.13460208]

>>13455491
>>13459828
damn that's shame. Really suits the book

[Anonymous No.13460233]

>>13455200
That's pretty hilariously wrong.

[Anonymous No.13460646]

[Anonymous No.13460679]

>>13460646
horrid taste, even if it's ironic

[Anonymous No.13460733]

Anything made by the Dillons.

[Anonymous No.13461352]

>>13453835
While I'm not fond of the font, I think their bible is appropriately gaudy.

[Anonymous No.13462114]

>>13461352
>>13461352
the red "gems" look tacky since they're a part of the print rather than embedded or encrusted

[Anonymous No.13462391]

>>13454551

[Anonymous No.13462791]

>>13457134
Holy shit