/lit/ - Literature

File: 79 KB, 184x274, 34FFD974-3EE2-4C68-9FDD-83F60E4D767B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:03:59 2019 No.13433822 [Reply] [Original]

Someone please debunk this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:12:27 2019 No.13433864 apple always fall down fucking retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:13:54 2019 No.13433872 >>13433822 >implying professors or anyone of high intelligence uses an anime image board You fucking dumb cunt

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:19:05 2019 No.13433897 >>13433822 >Someone please assert and justify my belief that scientism is the only legit religion.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:22:06 2019 No.13433912 File: 76 KB, 644x800, soy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13433822 >dude fuck your methodological standards HIV doesn't cause AIDs >contracts AIDs and die https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_(magazine)

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:23:28 2019 No.13433919 >>13433822 Read about Solomonoff Induction, Formal Epistemology and Bayesian epistemology, that'll provide good arguments against epistemological relativity

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:28:55 2019 No.13433952 >>13433919 >Bayesianism LessWrong? On my /lit/?

Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:36:58 2019 No.13434000

>>13433952
Ah lol well I did read about Kolmogorov Complexity on Less Wrong the first time, and I do know about Bayes because of Less Wrong, but it's related to AIXI (though that's kind of related to Less Wrong through Intelligence.org) and Berry's Paradox (which I learned about it through Wikipedia), and though I have read many Less Wrong articles, and I admire that community a lot, I do not consider myself part of that community, after all a lot of what I've read in less wrong, I already knew from reading Quine, and I should say too that they are a bit flawed in their approach to socialization, and that if you want to become better at reasoning, I think it would be more appropriate to read a book like "Thinking and Deciding" or "Rationality and the Reflective Mind", but you know Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality is a great piece of fiction and I do recommend reading "Rationality from AI to Zombies"

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:44:05 2019 No.13434052 >>13433822 All Feyerabendians I know use him not to be against scientism, but against science. but 've never dug deep enough to see if the man himself is as dumb as his followers.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 19:56:43 2019 No.13434119 >>13434052 Well he did reject pseudoscience as a concept.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 20:16:42 2019 No.13434223 >>13433822 Here you go, lazy faggot. https://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2007/10/05/how-not-to-feyerabend

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 20:18:07 2019 No.13434231 >>13434052 >>13434119 Didn't he defend astrology?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 8 22:47:59 2019 No.13434860 >>13434000 This is a very long way of saying "Yes".

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]