Anti-communist literature?

[Anonymous No.13424583]

Well?

[Anonymous No.13424587]

>>13424583
>I'm punching a girl
>Look at me I'm a hero
Wew

[Anonymous No.13424588]

>>13424587
Cringe

[Anonymous No.13424591]

>>13424583
She deserved it

[Anonymous No.13424593]

>>13424587
>Punching a whore
>A bad thing
wew

[Anonymous No.13424597]

>>13424583
What ever happened to Nathan Damigo?

[Anonymous No.13424606]

>>13424593
>I punched a girl
>It was a fair fight
Wew

[Anonymous No.13424613]

>>13424587
>>13424606
she struck first if I recall

[Anonymous No.13424615]

>>13424606
>Fair
Start shit get hit

[Anonymous No.13424617]

>>13424606
>Communist sympathizers cares what's fair
W E W

[Anonymous No.13424629]

JESUS WILL JUDGE YOU!
>Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

[Anonymous No.13424631]

>>13424606
No mercy for shit skins and commies

[Anonymous No.13424663]

>>13424583

[Anonymous No.13424665]

>>13424663
Would you be Mandy's slave /lit/?

[Anonymous No.13424670]

>>13424665
yes

[Anonymous No.13424682]

the gulag archipelago i supposed

[Anonymous No.13424687]

>>13424583
The founding fathers.

[Anonymous No.13424692]

>>13424613
>>13424615
>>13424617
>>13424631
Buy more bathwater incels

[Anonymous No.13424695]

>>13424687
Literally proto-communists, the fucking state of amerikaaners.

[Anonymous No.13424699]

>>13424606
>He does not believe in the equality of the sex
Have sex incel

[Anonymous No.13424705]

>>13424699
Nazis like you don't believe in the equality of the genders so what are you playing at?

[Anonymous No.13424706]

>>13424695
>guarantee rights and private property
>commies
No. You are dumb.

[Anonymous No.13424707]

>>13424587
>I want same rights
>don't punch women
wew

[Anonymous No.13424708]

>>13424699
>pretending to care about equality in order to advance your argument
Do you think you're fooling anyone with this snarky shit?

[Anonymous No.13424712]

>>13424583
everything that strikes you as anti-communistic. you can buy marx's books on sale and that would be an act of anticommunism. I highly recommend doing it too. buying marx on sale is pretty satisfactory.

[Anonymous No.13424720]

>>13424706
Hence the word "proto", idiot.

[Anonymous No.13424728]

>>13424708
just applying a standards of equality to every activity.
its just how it is women are powerful get over it.

[Anonymous No.13424733]

>>13424728
Women are part of a marginalized community, while they are equal, they do not currently have power in society. I know you're dog whistling but it's cringe as fuck bro

[Anonymous No.13424736]

>>13424692
I'm married though :^/

[Anonymous No.13424737]

>>13424736
your body pillow does not count as a "wife"

[Anonymous No.13424742]

>>13424736
You must be an American cop. 40% of cops beat up their wife and kids after a hard day of shooting innocent people in the streets.
Btw American cops commit 8% of the murders in America. You're probably a murderer too

[Anonymous No.13424748]

>>13424742
ACAB tbqhwithyoufamalam

[Anonymous No.13424749]

>>13424742
Wtf i love cops now

[Anonymous No.13424758]

>>13424737
>>13424742
Come on guys, a higher level of discourse please :^/

[Anonymous No.13424769]

>>13424758
>4chan
>high level of discourse, cited sources and no logical fallacies
Never gonna happen, bucko

[Anonymous No.13424771]

>>13424733
cringe bro, stop putting women down just because they dont let you fuck them.

[Anonymous No.13424773]

>>13424758
You cannot discuss something with terrorist scum like /pol/. We do not negotiate with terrorists

[Anonymous No.13424777]

>>13424682
Only decent response in the thread.

Orwell was also quite critical of communism, despite being a socialist himself. Actually a lot of anarchist/syndicalist literature is anticommunist, though for some strange reason they still generally prefer to characterize their opponents as "fascists" rather than "authoritarians," despite the latter usually being what they mean.

[Anonymous No.13424784]

>>13424771
The only people putting women down are conservatives; recognizing a group's current position in society is nothing more than acknowledging a problem. Also:
>>have sex
>from a conservative

[Anonymous No.13424790]

>>13424733
>Women are part of a marginalized community
LOL!

[Anonymous No.13424793]

>>13424784
Conservatives literally breed at double the rate liberals do, muh family muh religion, and both aren't dominated by trannies unlike nu commies are so they can actually reproduce.
Unlike you.

[Anonymous No.13424795]

>>13424784
im not even amerifat, so try something else.
yea if you had sex you can easily see the power woman have and stop putting them down.

[Anonymous No.13424796]

>>13424773
Cry some more ;^)

>>13424777
hough for some strange reason they still generally prefer to characterize their opponents as "fascists" rather than "authoritarians," despite the latter usually being what they mean
This is exactly the reason reading Homage to Catalonia was such a drag for me. He constantly complained about the communists/stalinists and why they were bad but at the same time called all the nationalists Fascists and did not give a SINGLE reason in all 200+ pages why Fascism was bad in his opinon.

[Anonymous No.13424797]

>>13424777
How can you be anti communist and anti totalitarian and then also be a socialist?
I guess George Orwell hated USSR

[Anonymous No.13424801]

>>13424793
Idiocracy incoming. Sad really

[Anonymous No.13424806]

>>13424795
Nice deflection. Go be American somewhere else

[Anonymous No.13424808]

>>13424777
>they still generally prefer to characterize their opponents as "fascists" rather than "authoritarians,"
Commies are probably the single least likely group to be able to accurately identify and describe fascism, you see it all the time.
Like another anon said, Homage to Catalonia bitches about some specific type of communism being wrong but then ignorantly refers to all Nationalist factions as 'fascist', even though they were far more divided in ideology than the Republicans.

[Anonymous No.13424813]

>>13424793
Imagine conflating reproduction with having sex. People on the left have way more sex than conservatives, the difference being they get more abortions and use birth control.
>>13424790
not an argument
>>13424795
>im not even amerifat
What does this have to do with you being an amerifat?

[Anonymous No.13424815]

>>13424806
nice non response there. My government actually has 50% women in it. Ot one of the most equal in europe. And that is even without any laws for it. So seeth more.

[Anonymous No.13424818]

>>13424813
conservatism in america has nothing to do with conservatism anywhere else

[Anonymous No.13424819]

>>13424813
>Imagine conflating reproduction with having sex

[Anonymous No.13424832]

>>13424818
The entire context of this conversation is within American society; I'm not speaking for every country but for my own.
>>13424819
Why do you think birth control and abortion exist, champ?

[Anonymous No.13424842]

>>13424813
>People on the left have way more sex than conservatives
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/02/right-wing-people-more-likely-to-be-happier-with-their-sex-lives/

[Anonymous No.13424845]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHdKxRAVrHA

Leaving this here as its of interest in light of recent events and OP pic related. Geoffrey Miller, an evo psychologist discusses the psychological underpinning with pol scientist and ex-antifa member Justin Murphy. He doesn;t completely renounce his identity as antifa (still believes in the premise that violence against those who don't initiate it, but are 'reasonably' perceived to promote it is justifiable), but condemns its recent actions - especially black bloc's. Pretty insightful and revealing despite his bias.

[Anonymous No.13424848]

>>13424842
>his ass:blasted
>the goal posts:moved

[Anonymous No.13424849]

>>13424813
>People on the left have way more sex than conservatives, the
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.13424850]

>>13424832
The point being if you're an extremist you're also probably a loser, conservatism and liberalism are mainstream, popular ideologies. Maybe one group has a stronger inclination to reproduce or practice abstination for religious or traditionalist reasons, but your laughable claim that literally ~50% of the population doesn't get sex but somehow reproduces at a higher rate than the other half is just brainlet beyond words.
I understand the have sex meme if you're a commie or actual Nazi extremist autist with no friends, but conservatives (or liberals for that matter)? Lolno.

[Anonymous No.13424851]

>>13424832
no its not its about women equality(or are you implying women for different countries are not equal?) , you pinned on my being a conservative(ameifat) when im not one.

[Anonymous No.13424853]

>>13424849
Conservatives only had sex when women were kept down. Now that women have rights and economic autonomy, we are getting incels. And most incels are right wing

[Anonymous No.13424854]

>>13424848

[Anonymous No.13424855]

>>13424848
I'm not the person you were arguing with, I literally just posted an article proving you wrong.

[Anonymous No.13424856]

>>13424850
>but your laughable claim that literally ~50% of the population doesn't get sex but somehow reproduces at a higher rate
Never made that claim, lol
>>13424851
No need to shift the argument, if I had known you were talking about another country I wouldn't have engaged; I can't speak to other systems only the one we have in the US

[Anonymous No.13424861]

>>13424853
If the right is all incels than the left is all beta males trying to pander to women.

[Anonymous No.13424863]

>>13424855
>proving you wrong
The article you posted said conservatives are happier with the amount of sex they have, IE they are happier with their sex lives, I didn't say the left was more satisfied with their sex lives, I said they have more sex. You are a retard.

[Anonymous No.13424869]

>>13424853
Incels tend strongly towards being extremist losers (commie (especially true with trannycels), Nazi or Islamism/ultra traditionalism) with majority apolitical nihilism.
Cons, at least in most of the world, see it as their duty to have children and be prosperous, again, due to tradition or religion.

[Anonymous No.13424872]

>>13424801
Looks like you need to have sex.

[Anonymous No.13424875]

>>13424856
>Never made that claim, lol
Incels are literally a few thousand people globally, implying they make up any significant chunk of any political affiliation is peak brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13424878]

>>13424875
>>13424869
>>13424861
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if incels became dramatically more common, not in the West where women are usually a very slight majority, but in places like China and India where men far outnumber women.

[Anonymous No.13424879]

>>13424875
Ummmm sweetie we are a movement of hundreds of thousands. The MGTOW subreddit has over 100k subscribers.

[Anonymous No.13424880]

>>13424797
He thought the USSR was "authoritarian". Quintessentially English take, really.

[Anonymous No.13424884]

>>13424879
MGTOW are volcels, right?

[Anonymous No.13424885]

>>13424875
>implying
You erroneously inferred an implication, ignored the original statement by the person on your side, and attempted to construct a strawman based off of your flawed interpretation of what I posted.

[Anonymous No.13424891]

>>13424884
Yeah, it's voluntary

[Anonymous No.13424899]

>>13424587
Punching an evil anarchist does make you a hero

[Anonymous No.13424907]

>>13424899
"Punching an evil fascist does make you a hero"

[Anonymous No.13424914]

>>13424880
>ussr was not authoritarian
that the quintessential braintlet take

[Anonymous No.13424916]

>>13424907
Fascists aren't evil and actually have good intentions. Anarchists want to destroy everything because they're going through puberty and are very edgy.

[Anonymous No.13424920]

>>13424916
>t.never read any anarchist literature

[Anonymous No.13424923]

>>13424907
Anarchists are people who feel they would benefit from no social order, it’s the ideology of antisocial assholes.

[Anonymous No.13424924]

>>13424920
Most Anarchists don't read anarchist literature so why should I?

[Anonymous No.13424925]

>>13424916
The majority of fascists I've talked to were edgy teens living with their parents lmao

[Anonymous No.13424927]

>>13424920
It's literally nothing personnel, kid: the ideology.

[Anonymous No.13424932]

>>13424925
>>13424923
>>13424916
>>13424907
>>13424899
Let's just agree if you're a first world extremist, you're a dorky LARPer loser.

[Anonymous No.13424933]

>>13424925
Pretty based. Why would you want to engage in a society you hate?

[Anonymous No.13424934]

>>13424916
>>13424923
every fucking time
why are conservatives so keen on criticizing leftist theory despite knowing jack shit about it :)

[Anonymous No.13424935]

>>13424932
Agreed

[Anonymous No.13424938]

>>13424924
>most people are retards why shouldn't I be?
It's fine if you don't want to read anarchist literature, but you sound like a retard to anyone who has. You clearly have no idea what anarchism meant to the people who created and perpetuate it. It'd be akin to me saying "Fascists just hate brown people!!!1!!". It's autistic to pretend you understand an ideology when you haven't studied it past watching a few youtube videos of retarded teenagers tipping trashcans. This goes for this guy as well >>13424923

[Anonymous No.13424939]

>>13424880
Are you implying the USSR was not authoritarian? Granted, it had a very complicated political structure, and it became much less authoritarian toward the end, but Orwell was writing about them during peak Stalin. I don't think it's an unfair characterization.

[Anonymous No.13424944]

>>13424925
>>13424927
The real losers use ad homs for arguments

[Anonymous No.13424945]

>>13424927
read some actual anarchist theory before spewing stupid shit like this, you poor conservative brainlet

[Anonymous No.13424946]

>>13424934
>why do people criticize an ideology for edgy teens
I dunno?

[Anonymous No.13424948]

>>13424945
How would an anarchist society function is they don't have a society?

[Anonymous No.13424949]

>>13424583
everything written by academic ""Marxists""
everything written by Stalinists and their derivatives (Maoists, Guevarists, etc.)

[Anonymous No.13424952]

>>13424933
that seems to be teen angst mostly. Hopefully they will grow out of it and contribute to society in some way :)

[Anonymous No.13424955]

>>13424916
>>13424923
>>13424932
I'm not antifa, nor anarchist. I hope both groups fighting eachother get police induced pepper spray showers in their skirmishes. Also rubber bullets and arrests until they are completely disincentivised to litter public streets.

[Anonymous No.13424960]

>>13424952
I don't think working in fast food contributes anything to society

[Anonymous No.13424961]

>>13424938
It's the most retarded thing ever.
>take what you need and contribute what you can
that'll totally work

[Anonymous No.13424967]

>>13424946
>Kropotkin, Bakunin, Chomsky
>Edgy teens
the only edgy teen is you, roman larper :^)

[Anonymous No.13424973]

>>13424967
Chomsky is a government funded 'libertarian socialist' and he's pro government now.

[Anonymous No.13424974]

>>13424961
"From each according to his ability and to each according to his need" is not a functional system on it's own, I agree. But saying "the system doesnt function" is different from saying "Anarchists want to destroy everything because they're going through puberty and are very edgy". That's never been the ideology of any anarchist writer with influence. It's a pea-brained analysis of a complex issue.

[Anonymous No.13424986]

>>13424583
>anti-x literature thread

[Anonymous No.13425002]

>>13424939
"Authoritarian" is kind of meaningless, all that happens under "libertarian" governments is that authority is passed to informal power centers.

[Anonymous No.13425017]

>>13424955
Based position.

[Anonymous No.13425024]

>>13424944
>>13424945
There is no debate, even authoritarian commies make fun of you retards nowadays.

[Anonymous No.13425156]

>>13424583
Karl Marx and the Close of His System

[Anonymous No.13425158]

>>13424583
The Communist Manifesto
The Black Book of Communism
A People's Tragedy
A Concise History of the Russian Revolution
Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime: 1919–1924
The Great Terror: a Reassessment
Red Famine (Applebaum)
The Devil in History (Tismaneanu)
The Naked Communist
The Gulag Archipelago
Mao: the Unknown History
Main Currents of Marxism
Disinformation (Ion Mihai Pacepa)
Eminent Historians
New Lies for Old
The Perestroika Deception
To Build a Castle: My Life as a Dissenter
Kotkin's trilogy on Stalin (the final volume isn't yet published)
Dikötter's trilogy on the history of China
Marx & Satan
Evil Days: 30 years of war and famine in Ethiopia
Cuban Communism (Horowitz)
Comrades!: A History of World Communism
Boomerang Chavez


These are the ones I remember right now. They're very diverse in their content

[Anonymous No.13425172]

i don't understand anarchists
can somebody explain why they support a "system" where literally nothing works?

[Anonymous No.13425180]

>>13425158
I'll also add these two

Red Cocaine
Pol Pot: Anatomy of a Nightmare

And if you know Spanish

El Libro Negro de la Nueva Izquierda

[Anonymous No.13425186]

>>13425158
>>13425180
and Basic Economics by Sowell

[Anonymous No.13425364]

>>13424665
>Thinks slavery is bad
>Wants to be a slave

[Anonymous No.13425372]

>>13424665
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP