/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.13397890]

Serious question:

Are there any novelists covering the rapidly changing ethnic demographics in Europe?

I'm aware of Houellebecq, but for such a major issue it seems strange no other fiction writers are writing about it, i.e. about white populations becoming minorities in their own countries.

[Anonymous No.13397901]

Jean Raspail's Camp of the Saints is still good

Pic related is good but not fiction:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finis_Germania

[Anonymous No.13397914]

>>13397901
Anything more contemporary?

[Anonymous No.13397930]

>>13397890
"White" is not an ethnicity

[Anonymous No.13397936]

>>13397890
>rapidly changing ethnic demographics in Europe
Nonsense. Check actual statistics rather than watching the news on TV.
Submission is one of Houellebecq's worst books, written to benefit from the fear of the other to advertise his work.

[Anonymous No.13397946]

>>13397914
It's going to be pretty difficult since 99% of "high culture" outlets, publishers and art criticism and academia and so forth, are monopolized by soft-hearted empty-headed women, Jews, and token minorities. Even if things are being written, they are certainly not being published except by outsider presses that have arbitrary quality controls. They won't be reviewed.

It's not even a conscious choice. Because there's no culture of critique built up around this subject, no pun intended, existing critics and reviewers wouldn't know what to do with great art on the subject if it did appear. They wouldn't be able to recognize it.

[Anonymous No.13397948]

>>13397936
How about pic related?

[Anonymous No.13397951]

>>13397936
>written to benefit from the fear of the other to advertise his work
you talk like a fat boomer audience member on question time. I doubt you've actually read the novel.

[Anonymous No.13397954]

>>13397930
doesn't change the fact that native ethnicities are being replaced by non-europeans

[Anonymous No.13398185]

>>13397954
Ethnicity is a spook

[Anonymous No.13398209]

>>13397936
Soumission was only tangentially about race/ethnicity (and to even say it was tangentially about race/ethincity is to overstate the role of those in the book), and was about how wide-spread secular humanism ultimately leaves a society and a culture defenseless against organized proselytizing from outside groups. Any defense that the society/culture might have once had (the Catholicism that François tries so desperately, but unsuccessfully, to re-cultivate) becomes so weakened that it becomes purely of historical interest, but no practical import.

France is right on that tipping point; Houllebecq captured it well.

[Anonymous No.13398225]

>>13397936
Soumission was only tangentially about race/ethnicity (and to even say it was tangentially about race/ethincity is to overstate the role of those in the book), and was about how wide-spread secular humanism ultimately leaves a society and a culture defenseless against organized proselytizing from outside groups. Any defense that the society/culture might have once had (the Catholicism that François tries so desperately, but unsuccessfully, to re-cultivate) becomes so weakened that it becomes purely of historical interest, but no practical import.

France is right on that tipping point; Houllebecq captured it well.

[Anonymous No.13398260]

>>13398225
Do you think you could read Submission as a pro-Islam novel?

It makes the arguent that humanism is empty, that we cannot return back to Christianity, and the only option will be Islam.

[Anonymous No.13398395]

>>13397948
Very nice. Do you mind telling us what version of Word this was made with?

>>13397951
I read most of his work. Do you really make such a statement on a book without having read it? What for?

>>13398225
That's a sane analysis.
>France is right on that tipping point; Houllebecq captured it well.
That's an opinion.

[Anonymous No.13398422]

>>13398395
Your crusade to put an end the alt right once and for all will be won or lost in this very thread. This is the final battleground.

Remember, don't EVER stop replying to every single post that contradicts your own stance, to let it know that your stance is in fact the correct one. This nice day could not possibly be spent any better than that! Don't get into any conversations of substance about these issues either, though. That's an alt right trick to bog you down in the details. Instead, always reply with flat contradictions and low-effort jabs. If someone says "Houellebecq is good" reply with "No, he's bad though" or "says YOU!" You can very it up a bit, just as long as you don't talk about anything.

Above all, keep replying. Reply to every post. Make long posts where you reply to ten people at once. Your victory is near at hand. Don't look up from your phone. Don't forget about the thread and let someone get the last word. Can you imagine? Keep monitoring the thread, all day. If anyone says, "No, it's not just my opinion, Houellebecq actually did capture it well," you HAVE to reply with "No he didn't!" or else the war will be lost. All of your efforts to this point will be for nothing, unless you make sure to contradict the people who are manifestly wrong, and teach them once and for all that you are manifestly right, because you said so.

[Anonymous No.13398549]

>>13398260
It isn’t really pro-islam, Houellebecq has quite a distain for it. It’s mainly that western secular humanism has fallen so much that even something such as Islam is preferable.

[Anonymous No.13398817]

>>13397890

https://www.counter-currents.com/hold-back-this-day/

https://www.counter-currents.com/product/fenek-soleres-rising/