[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 86 KB, 958x178, what did he mean by this.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396459 No.13396459 [Reply] [Original]

does anyone have any intuition as to what this word means? a google search yields only stuff from Ancestry.com and Facebook, along with a few token references in old German/Latin books (if there's a meaning in German, I can't find it, and the Latin means "send" but that doesn't really make sense in the context of the sentence). Is it a legomenon of some sort? If that's the case, why would it be used as a noun with no alternative explanation? This is from Oskar Lange's "Marxian Economics and Modern Economic Theory" (1935), for those interested.

>> No.13396461
File: 439 KB, 556x773, 1557701635473.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13396461

>>13396459
What's a good place to go for Ted talks and to find related resources?

>> No.13396468

>>13396459
wtf is wrong with you just have sex u spaz

>> No.13396478

>>13396459
legaminauts

>> No.13396536

>>13396459
When was this published, OP

I think I vaguely understand it
https://eu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legamia

>> No.13397961

>>13396459
I figure I may as well ask here, what is the best translation or version of the Bible?

>> No.13397981

>>13397961
Original greek, hebrew etc or go home

>> No.13397985

>>13397981
Quit being autistic. I'm not reading it in Greek or Hebrew

>> No.13398187

>>13397985
Read it in whatever. It doesn’t really matter.

>> No.13398431

I think that consciousness has a material basis BUT that it's an emergent phenomenon and can't be fully explained as >dude chemicals lmao. Are there any philosophers that address this?

>> No.13398443

>>13398431
>I think that consciousness has a material basis
>le emergent phenomenon meme
You are a brainlet for thinking that so you shouldn't even bother reading philosophy in the first place.

>> No.13398456

>>13398443
How is it more brainlet than being an idealist or a vulgar materialist?