[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 40 KB, 484x578, Heidegger_1955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13330185 No.13330185 [Reply] [Original]

how could one man be so wrong

>> No.13330192
File: 175 KB, 560x420, 1561000609313.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13330192

>>13330185
Expwain yoself

>> No.13330197

>>13330185
I'll rather say quine is better at talking concept of being

>> No.13330207

>>13330185
He was a metaphysician

>> No.13330217

>>13330207
Terrible response

>> No.13330220

>>13330207
That... doesn't mean anything. It is like calling chair a chair in a middle of argument. It is strangely meaningless.
I... think you attempt to say "metaphysics cannot be right or wrong", but this is fatal misconception to the metaphysics.

>> No.13330222

>>13330185
By being the man to think and talk about what no one has ever talked about

>> No.13330231
File: 23 KB, 220x316, unnamed (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13330231

>>13330222
Not a fan whatsoever but steps in your path

>> No.13330251
File: 132 KB, 305x479, 1554118334197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13330251

what do i need to read to understand him and his "what's metaphysics" lecture and his "The Question Concerning Technology" lecture?

what are some living Heideggerians apart from Dugin and Yuk Hui?

>> No.13330319

>>13330251
>what do i need to read to understand him and his "what's metaphysics" lecture and his "The Question Concerning Technology" lecture?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fBYpm4MHyKM-80sTzQaBiYLI0vJKkE80h2b10JR5cwg/mobilebasic?pli=1
this is assuming you read your Greeks, Bible, Enlightenment philosophy from Descartes to Kant, and Germans up to Nietzsche, otherwise:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1
reading a German talking about metaphysics without having read Aristotle is like reading a pathology paper without knowing what a cell is
>what are some living Heideggerians apart from Dugin and Yuk Hui?
Vattimo, Hubert Dreyfus, Jean-Luc Marion, Sloterdijk, Agamben, Stiegler. Žižek and the speculative realism/OOO crowd started as a heideggerians, virtually all continental philosophy since 1927 is responding to Heidegger in some fashion

>> No.13330336

>>13330319
>speculative realism/OOO ... started as a heideggerians
really? I thought Whitehead?

>> No.13330361

>>13330220
>I... think you attempt to say "metaphysics cannot be right or wrong", but this is fatal misconception to the metaphysics.
Not only that, it's a metaphysical statement itself.

>> No.13330362

>>13330185
He's right though

>> No.13330366

>>13330361
This

>> No.13330373

>>13330251
>what are some living Heideggerians apart from Dugin and Yuk Hui?
I'd say people, but we know Heidi had a hard time with one.

>> No.13330465

>>13330336
the only one that bothers with Whitehead is Harman, and he still began as a heideggerian

>> No.13330506

>>13330366
that

>> No.13330772

>>13330319
>I can personally recommend this dictionary, it is an excellent reference. If you're still not convinced Have sex

>> No.13330779

>>13330319
which texts of Zizek does he address Heidegger directly? i've heard him on some lectures tangentially asserting that Heidegger is "the real deal" and that one can't dismiss him despite where his ideas took him, but i've never seen him expand on this

>> No.13330787

>>13330373
who made him hard apart from Arendt?

>> No.13330791
File: 11 KB, 200x285, 9a950a0cc99437a7eb63996282b80039-e1506559626776.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13330791

>>13330787
forgot pic